Local perceptions of spatial management indicate challenges and opportunities for effective zoning of sustainable-use protected areas in Brazil

IF 1.6 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Anthropocene Coasts Pub Date : 2023-03-20 DOI:10.1139/anc-2020-0008
Rebecca Borges, Annette Breckwoldt, Roberta Sá Leitão Barboza, Marion Glaser
{"title":"Local perceptions of spatial management indicate challenges and opportunities for effective zoning of sustainable-use protected areas in Brazil","authors":"Rebecca Borges,&nbsp;Annette Breckwoldt,&nbsp;Roberta Sá Leitão Barboza,&nbsp;Marion Glaser","doi":"10.1139/anc-2020-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Protected areas (PAs) are widely applied conservation instruments. Often, they are also expected to help secure livelihoods of poor subsistence, small-scale producers, making the management of PAs often dependent on community support. The usefulness of analyzing the perceptions of PAs among local users to improve the effectiveness of PA management is increasingly recognized; however, there are few studies on spatial perceptions, for example, how users perceive the PA’s geographical boundaries or its zoning, and how these can be used in PA zoning. Here, we analyze how local stakeholders perceive two sustainable-use PAs on the Amazon coast, the changes they have brought about, and their current management. We identify and link the mental models of different user groups to formal conceptualizations of the PAs in legal instruments and identify mismatches related to what the PA means to local stakeholders and where it is located, which need to be considered when building a zoning plan. Because of the frequent research in our study area, we also discuss possible research fatigue in this region. We highlight the challenges and opportunities related to promoting spatial literacy and awareness-raising regarding PAs. We recommend adapting legal instruments to include diverse territorial representations and alternative management tools.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100098,"journal":{"name":"Anthropocene Coasts","volume":"4 1","pages":"210 - 232"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropocene Coasts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1139/anc-2020-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Protected areas (PAs) are widely applied conservation instruments. Often, they are also expected to help secure livelihoods of poor subsistence, small-scale producers, making the management of PAs often dependent on community support. The usefulness of analyzing the perceptions of PAs among local users to improve the effectiveness of PA management is increasingly recognized; however, there are few studies on spatial perceptions, for example, how users perceive the PA’s geographical boundaries or its zoning, and how these can be used in PA zoning. Here, we analyze how local stakeholders perceive two sustainable-use PAs on the Amazon coast, the changes they have brought about, and their current management. We identify and link the mental models of different user groups to formal conceptualizations of the PAs in legal instruments and identify mismatches related to what the PA means to local stakeholders and where it is located, which need to be considered when building a zoning plan. Because of the frequent research in our study area, we also discuss possible research fatigue in this region. We highlight the challenges and opportunities related to promoting spatial literacy and awareness-raising regarding PAs. We recommend adapting legal instruments to include diverse territorial representations and alternative management tools.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当地对空间管理的看法表明,巴西可持续利用保护区的有效分区面临挑战和机遇
保护区是应用广泛的保护工具。通常,他们还被期望帮助维持生计的小规模生产者的生计,这使得PA的管理往往依赖社区支持。分析当地用户对PA的看法以提高PA管理的有效性的有用性越来越得到认可;然而,很少有关于空间感知的研究,例如,用户如何感知PA的地理边界或分区,以及如何将其用于PA分区。在这里,我们分析了当地利益相关者如何看待亚马逊海岸的两个可持续使用PA,它们带来的变化,以及它们目前的管理。我们确定了不同用户群体的心理模型,并将其与法律文书中PA的正式概念联系起来,并确定了与PA对当地利益相关者意味着什么以及它的位置相关的不匹配,在制定分区计划时需要考虑这些不匹配。由于我们研究领域的频繁研究,我们还讨论了该领域可能存在的研究疲劳。我们强调了与促进空间扫盲和提高对PA的认识有关的挑战和机遇。我们建议调整法律文书,以纳入不同的领土代表和替代管理工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Heavy metals in core sediments from the western Bay of Bengal: implications on historical pollution, eco-environmental risks, and potential sources Socio-economic risk assessment of the setback zone in beaches threatened by sea level rise induced retreat (Peloponnese coast- Eastern Mediterranean) Impacts of a growing population on the coastal environment of the Bay of Bengal Mapping coastal resilience: a Gis-based Bayesian network approach to coastal hazard identification for Queensland’s dynamic shorelines Effects of nourished beach morphology on storm response
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1