Positioning of antihistamines in the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines

Joaquim Mullol
{"title":"Positioning of antihistamines in the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines","authors":"Joaquim Mullol","doi":"10.1111/j.1472-9733.2011.01158.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a major health problem with high and ever-increasing prevalence worldwide. At least one-fifth of adults in industrialized countries are estimated to have AR, defined as nasal and eye symptoms that are sufficiently severe to have a substantial negative impact on the quality of life (QoL). The former classification of AR comprised seasonal AR (SAR) and perennial AR (PAR), which did not adequately reflect the presentation and clinical course of the disease. The Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) classification is based on the duration of symptoms and the disease severity. Both intermittent AR (IAR: symptoms ≤ 4 days/week or ≤ 4 consecutive weeks) and persistent AR (PER: symptoms &gt; 4 days/week and &gt; 4 consecutive weeks) may be mild, moderate, or severe based on the QOL impairment (sleep, daily activities/leisure, work productivity/school performance) and bothersome symptoms. Despite its disabling effects, AR remains a condition where affected individuals do not seek appropriate treatment, are undertreated and do not adhere well to treatment, which all lead to low disease control and high societal costs. The four pillars of AR treatment are allergen and pollutant avoidance, patient education, pharmacotherapy and allergen-specific immunotherapy. Oral antihistamines, together with intranasal corticosteroids and leucotriene antagonists, constitute important pharmacological options for the treatment of AR at all levels of severity. New second-generation antihistamines are H<sub>1</sub>-receptor antagonists with high efficacy (rapid onset of action for AR symptoms, sometimes even on nasal congestion, improvement of QoL and additional anti-allergic effects) and safety (low sedation rates). Although new antihistamines have been studied and approved for SAR and PAR, only some of them have been reported to show efficacy and safety for treatment of AR under the ARIA classification: levocetirizine (high efficacy) and rupatadine (dual antihistamine and anti-PAF effects) for PER, and desloratadine (high safety) for both IAR and PER.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100264,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Experimental Allergy Reviews","volume":"12 1","pages":"17-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1472-9733.2011.01158.x","citationCount":"290","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Experimental Allergy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1472-9733.2011.01158.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 290

Abstract

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a major health problem with high and ever-increasing prevalence worldwide. At least one-fifth of adults in industrialized countries are estimated to have AR, defined as nasal and eye symptoms that are sufficiently severe to have a substantial negative impact on the quality of life (QoL). The former classification of AR comprised seasonal AR (SAR) and perennial AR (PAR), which did not adequately reflect the presentation and clinical course of the disease. The Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) classification is based on the duration of symptoms and the disease severity. Both intermittent AR (IAR: symptoms ≤ 4 days/week or ≤ 4 consecutive weeks) and persistent AR (PER: symptoms > 4 days/week and > 4 consecutive weeks) may be mild, moderate, or severe based on the QOL impairment (sleep, daily activities/leisure, work productivity/school performance) and bothersome symptoms. Despite its disabling effects, AR remains a condition where affected individuals do not seek appropriate treatment, are undertreated and do not adhere well to treatment, which all lead to low disease control and high societal costs. The four pillars of AR treatment are allergen and pollutant avoidance, patient education, pharmacotherapy and allergen-specific immunotherapy. Oral antihistamines, together with intranasal corticosteroids and leucotriene antagonists, constitute important pharmacological options for the treatment of AR at all levels of severity. New second-generation antihistamines are H1-receptor antagonists with high efficacy (rapid onset of action for AR symptoms, sometimes even on nasal congestion, improvement of QoL and additional anti-allergic effects) and safety (low sedation rates). Although new antihistamines have been studied and approved for SAR and PAR, only some of them have been reported to show efficacy and safety for treatment of AR under the ARIA classification: levocetirizine (high efficacy) and rupatadine (dual antihistamine and anti-PAF effects) for PER, and desloratadine (high safety) for both IAR and PER.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗组胺药在过敏性鼻炎中的定位及其对哮喘的影响(ARIA)指南
过敏性鼻炎(AR)是一个主要的健康问题,在全球范围内发病率很高且不断增加。据估计,工业化国家至少有五分之一的成年人患有AR,AR是指严重到足以对生活质量产生重大负面影响的鼻腔和眼部症状。AR以前的分类包括季节性AR(SAR)和常年性AR(标准杆数),它们不能充分反映疾病的表现和临床过程。过敏性鼻炎及其对哮喘的影响(ARIA)分类基于症状的持续时间和疾病的严重程度。间歇性AR(IAR:症状≤4天/周或≤4周)和持续性AR(PER:症状>;4天/周和>;连续4周)都可能是轻度、中度或重度的,这取决于生活质量障碍(睡眠、日常活动/休闲、工作效率/学校表现)和令人烦恼的症状。尽管AR具有致残性影响,但它仍然是一种受影响的个体不寻求适当治疗、治疗不足、坚持治疗不力的情况,所有这些都导致疾病控制率低和社会成本高。AR治疗的四大支柱是避免过敏原和污染物、患者教育、药物治疗和过敏原特异性免疫疗法。口服抗组胺药,加上鼻内皮质类固醇和白三烯拮抗剂,构成了治疗各种严重程度AR的重要药理学选择。新的第二代抗组胺药是H1受体拮抗剂,具有高效性(AR症状起效快,有时甚至对鼻塞、生活质量改善和额外的抗过敏作用)和安全性(镇静率低)。尽管新的抗组胺药物已被研究并批准用于SAR和标准杆数,但根据ARIA分类,只有其中一些药物显示出治疗AR的有效性和安全性:左西替利嗪(高效)和鲁帕他定(双重抗组胺和抗PAF作用)用于PER,地氯雷他定(高安全性)用于IAR和PER。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FOREWORD Making the allergic child happy: treating more than symptoms Drugs used in paediatric allergy: should we conduct studies in children or extrapolate from adults? Business and science: a partnership for the benefit of allergic patients Freedom to enjoy life – the ultimate goal in allergy management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1