Effects of sedative and non-sedative antihistamine drugs on prefrontal cortex activities: towards pharmacological near-infrared spectroscopy studies

Takeo Tsujii, Kaoru Sakatani, Sayako Masuda, Shigeru Watanabe
{"title":"Effects of sedative and non-sedative antihistamine drugs on prefrontal cortex activities: towards pharmacological near-infrared spectroscopy studies","authors":"Takeo Tsujii,&nbsp;Kaoru Sakatani,&nbsp;Sayako Masuda,&nbsp;Shigeru Watanabe","doi":"10.1111/j.1472-9733.2011.01161.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Histamine H1-receptor antagonists (antihistamines) are widely used for the treatment of allergic disorders in young children. It is well known that the newer antihistamine drugs elicit better performances of working memory and selective attention than the first-generation drugs in this class. However, the neural correlates of the poorer performances associated with the first-generation antihistamines remain relatively unknown. In this article, we review recent studies in our laboratory that examined the effects of antihistamine drugs on prefrontal cortex activities in adults and young children using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), an emerging brain imaging method that is suitable for psychological experiments. In the first study, we examined the prefrontal cortex activities while adult subjects performed a working memory task at 3 hours after taking a first-generation antihistamine (ketotifen), a second-generation antihistamine (epinastine), or a placebo. We found that cortical activation at the lateral prefrontal region increased during the performance of the working memory task in subjects administered epinastine or the placebo but not in those administered ketotifen. In the second study conducted in 15 healthy pre-school children (mean age: 5.5 years), ketotifen significantly impaired the behavioural performance and cortical activation at the lateral prefrontal cortex in a working memory task compared with epinastine and the placebo. In the third study conducted in school-aged children (mean age: 7.7 years), ketotifen significantly impaired the behavioural performance and cortical activation at the lateral prefrontal cortex compared with the placebo. There were no sedative effects on the neural responses or behavioural performance after epinastine administration. These studies demonstrate for the first time the differential sedation effects of first- and second-generation antihistamines on brain haemodynamic responses in young children. We also discuss the utility of the NIRS technique in psychopharmacological studies of children.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100264,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Experimental Allergy Reviews","volume":"12 1","pages":"37-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1472-9733.2011.01161.x","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Experimental Allergy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1472-9733.2011.01161.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Histamine H1-receptor antagonists (antihistamines) are widely used for the treatment of allergic disorders in young children. It is well known that the newer antihistamine drugs elicit better performances of working memory and selective attention than the first-generation drugs in this class. However, the neural correlates of the poorer performances associated with the first-generation antihistamines remain relatively unknown. In this article, we review recent studies in our laboratory that examined the effects of antihistamine drugs on prefrontal cortex activities in adults and young children using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), an emerging brain imaging method that is suitable for psychological experiments. In the first study, we examined the prefrontal cortex activities while adult subjects performed a working memory task at 3 hours after taking a first-generation antihistamine (ketotifen), a second-generation antihistamine (epinastine), or a placebo. We found that cortical activation at the lateral prefrontal region increased during the performance of the working memory task in subjects administered epinastine or the placebo but not in those administered ketotifen. In the second study conducted in 15 healthy pre-school children (mean age: 5.5 years), ketotifen significantly impaired the behavioural performance and cortical activation at the lateral prefrontal cortex in a working memory task compared with epinastine and the placebo. In the third study conducted in school-aged children (mean age: 7.7 years), ketotifen significantly impaired the behavioural performance and cortical activation at the lateral prefrontal cortex compared with the placebo. There were no sedative effects on the neural responses or behavioural performance after epinastine administration. These studies demonstrate for the first time the differential sedation effects of first- and second-generation antihistamines on brain haemodynamic responses in young children. We also discuss the utility of the NIRS technique in psychopharmacological studies of children.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
镇静和非镇静抗组胺药物对前额叶皮层活动的影响:药理学近红外光谱研究
组胺H1受体拮抗剂(抗组胺药)广泛用于治疗幼儿过敏性疾病。众所周知,新型抗组胺药比这类第一代药物在工作记忆和选择性注意力方面表现更好。然而,与第一代抗组胺药相关的较差性能的神经相关性仍然相对未知。在这篇文章中,我们回顾了我们实验室最近的研究,这些研究使用近红外光谱(NIRS)检测了抗组胺药物对成人和幼儿前额叶皮层活动的影响,这是一种新兴的大脑成像方法,适用于心理实验。在第一项研究中,我们检查了成年受试者在服用第一代抗组胺药(酮替芬)、第二代抗组胺剂(依匹那丁)或安慰剂后3小时进行工作记忆任务时的前额叶皮层活动。我们发现,在服用依匹那丁或安慰剂的受试者执行工作记忆任务期间,外侧前额叶区域的皮层激活增加,但在服用酮替芬的受试人中没有。在对15名健康学龄前儿童(平均年龄:5.5岁)进行的第二项研究中,与依匹那丁和安慰剂相比,酮替芬在工作记忆任务中显著损害了行为表现和外侧前额叶皮层的皮层激活。在对学龄儿童(平均年龄:7.7岁)进行的第三项研究中,与安慰剂相比,酮替芬显著损害了行为表现和外侧前额叶皮层的皮层激活。依匹那丁给药后对神经反应或行为表现没有镇静作用。这些研究首次证明了第一代和第二代抗组胺药对幼儿大脑血液动力学反应的不同镇静作用。我们还讨论了近红外光谱技术在儿童心理药理学研究中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FOREWORD Making the allergic child happy: treating more than symptoms Drugs used in paediatric allergy: should we conduct studies in children or extrapolate from adults? Business and science: a partnership for the benefit of allergic patients Freedom to enjoy life – the ultimate goal in allergy management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1