Reinforcement schedule thinning following functional communication training: A systematic review

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Behavioral Interventions Pub Date : 2023-06-09 DOI:10.1002/bin.1959
Tonya N. Davis, Jessica S. Akers, Emily Exline, Suzannah K. Avery, MacKenzie Wicker
{"title":"Reinforcement schedule thinning following functional communication training: A systematic review","authors":"Tonya N. Davis,&nbsp;Jessica S. Akers,&nbsp;Emily Exline,&nbsp;Suzannah K. Avery,&nbsp;MacKenzie Wicker","doi":"10.1002/bin.1959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Functional communication training (FCT) is a highly effective intervention to reduce challenging behavior. However, continuous reinforcement of the functional communicative response typically used during FCT cannot be maintained in natural settings. Reinforcement schedule thinning addresses this drawback. In order to better inform practice and future research, we conducted a systematic review of all peer-reviewed studies published between the years 1985 and 2022 that implemented schedule thinning following FCT. We identified 82 articles with 296 participants and 401 applications of schedule thinning. We summarized each application according to characteristics of the participant, FCT, and schedule thinning procedure. We identified nine unique schedule thinning procedures. The four most prevalent were multiple schedules, chained schedules, delay-to-reinforcement, and response restriction with a correlation between the function of challenging behavior and the selected schedule thinning approach. Notably, there was great procedural variability across each procedure. Very few studies were conducted in natural settings or involved natural change agents in selecting the terminal schedule of reinforcement or as schedule thinning implementers. Although there is ample evidence supporting the efficacy of schedule thinning after FCT, more research is needed to determine the most effective procedures necessary to ensure that the benefits of FCT can be maintained via schedule thinning in natural settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47138,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Interventions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bin.1959","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Functional communication training (FCT) is a highly effective intervention to reduce challenging behavior. However, continuous reinforcement of the functional communicative response typically used during FCT cannot be maintained in natural settings. Reinforcement schedule thinning addresses this drawback. In order to better inform practice and future research, we conducted a systematic review of all peer-reviewed studies published between the years 1985 and 2022 that implemented schedule thinning following FCT. We identified 82 articles with 296 participants and 401 applications of schedule thinning. We summarized each application according to characteristics of the participant, FCT, and schedule thinning procedure. We identified nine unique schedule thinning procedures. The four most prevalent were multiple schedules, chained schedules, delay-to-reinforcement, and response restriction with a correlation between the function of challenging behavior and the selected schedule thinning approach. Notably, there was great procedural variability across each procedure. Very few studies were conducted in natural settings or involved natural change agents in selecting the terminal schedule of reinforcement or as schedule thinning implementers. Although there is ample evidence supporting the efficacy of schedule thinning after FCT, more research is needed to determine the most effective procedures necessary to ensure that the benefits of FCT can be maintained via schedule thinning in natural settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
功能沟通培训后的强化计划细化:系统综述
功能沟通训练(FCT)是一种减少挑战行为的高效干预措施。然而,FCT期间通常使用的功能性交际反应的持续强化不能在自然环境中保持。钢筋减薄解决了这一缺点。为了更好地为实践和未来的研究提供信息,我们对1985年至2022年间发表的所有同行评审研究进行了系统审查,这些研究在《烟草控制框架公约》之后实施了时间表细化。我们确定了82篇文章,296名参与者和401个时间表细化应用程序。我们根据参与者的特点、FCT和时间表细化程序总结了每种应用。我们确定了九种独特的时间表细化程序。四种最普遍的是多个时间表、链式时间表、延迟强化和反应限制,挑战行为的功能与所选时间表细化方法之间存在相关性。值得注意的是,每个程序都存在很大的程序可变性。很少有研究是在自然环境中进行的,或涉及自然变化因素来选择最终加固时间表或作为时间表细化的实施者。尽管有充分的证据支持《烟草控制框架公约》后减薄时间表的有效性,但还需要更多的研究来确定最有效的必要程序,以确保在自然环境中通过减薄时间表来保持《烟草控制范围公约》的效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Interventions
Behavioral Interventions PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Behavioral Interventions aims to report research and practice involving the utilization of behavioral techniques in the treatment, education, assessment and training of students, clients or patients, as well as training techniques used with staff. Behavioral Interventions publishes: (1) research articles, (2) brief reports (a short report of an innovative technique or intervention that may be less rigorous than a research report), (3) topical literature reviews and discussion articles, (4) book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating video feedback to improve eSports performance in Street Fighter V Discrepancies between treatment preference and effectiveness Effects of an online group‐based intervention on effort tolerance in general education Further analysis of fixed‐lean approaches to reinforcement schedule thinning Token economies: Evidence‐based recommendations for practitioners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1