Comparison of the Influence of Supportive and Sensorimotor Insoles on Flat Feet in Children - a Double-Blind, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Kira-Henriette Liebau, Alexander P-L Schmitt, Susanne Fröhlich, Claudia Bünzen, Wolfram Mittelmeier, Christoph Schulze
{"title":"Comparison of the Influence of Supportive and Sensorimotor Insoles on Flat Feet in Children - a Double-Blind, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.","authors":"Kira-Henriette Liebau, Alexander P-L Schmitt, Susanne Fröhlich, Claudia Bünzen, Wolfram Mittelmeier, Christoph Schulze","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0053.9346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Besides arch-supportive insoles, sensorimotor insoles are used for the treatment of flatfoot in children. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of both types of insoles on the arch-supporting muscles and clinical aspects in children with flexible flatfoot.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>52 children with flexible flatfoot (mean age of 8.22.7 years) were enrolled. Supportive, sensorimotor, and placebo insoles were compared. Muscle activity was detected by surface electromyography during the midstance phase. Valgus index, foot and ankle disability index (FADI) and pain were assessed at enrolment and after 6 and 12 months. Mixed-design ANOVA was used for statistical evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Supportive and sensorimotor insoles caused significantly lower activity in the tibialis anterior in comparison to placebo insoles regarding the parameter Mean. No significant differences could be detected between both types of therapeutic insoles. Supportive insoles showed a significant decrease regarding the parameter Amplitude of the peroneus longus. Placebo insoles produced an increase in the valgus index, while both therapeutic insoles did not induce any changes. The sensorimotor insoles induced an increase in FADI, while the supportive and placebo insoles had no significant effect on this parameter.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>1. Supportive and sensorimotor insoles potentially influence muscle activity in the lower leg. 2. Both could influence the longitudinal arch in flat feet. 3. While placebo insoles caused a deterioration of the valgus index, both kinds of therapeutic insoles could possibly prevent the progression of the flatfoot. 4. Clinical studies including more clinical aspects and long-term observations are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":19622,"journal":{"name":"Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja","volume":"25 4","pages":"195-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.9346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Besides arch-supportive insoles, sensorimotor insoles are used for the treatment of flatfoot in children. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of both types of insoles on the arch-supporting muscles and clinical aspects in children with flexible flatfoot.

Material and methods: 52 children with flexible flatfoot (mean age of 8.22.7 years) were enrolled. Supportive, sensorimotor, and placebo insoles were compared. Muscle activity was detected by surface electromyography during the midstance phase. Valgus index, foot and ankle disability index (FADI) and pain were assessed at enrolment and after 6 and 12 months. Mixed-design ANOVA was used for statistical evaluation.

Results: Supportive and sensorimotor insoles caused significantly lower activity in the tibialis anterior in comparison to placebo insoles regarding the parameter Mean. No significant differences could be detected between both types of therapeutic insoles. Supportive insoles showed a significant decrease regarding the parameter Amplitude of the peroneus longus. Placebo insoles produced an increase in the valgus index, while both therapeutic insoles did not induce any changes. The sensorimotor insoles induced an increase in FADI, while the supportive and placebo insoles had no significant effect on this parameter.

Conclusions: 1. Supportive and sensorimotor insoles potentially influence muscle activity in the lower leg. 2. Both could influence the longitudinal arch in flat feet. 3. While placebo insoles caused a deterioration of the valgus index, both kinds of therapeutic insoles could possibly prevent the progression of the flatfoot. 4. Clinical studies including more clinical aspects and long-term observations are necessary.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持性和感觉运动性鞋垫对儿童平足影响的比较——一项双盲、前瞻性、随机、对照试验。
背景:除了足弓支撑鞋垫外,感觉运动鞋垫还用于治疗儿童扁平足。本研究的目的是比较两种类型的鞋垫对柔性扁平足儿童足弓支撑肌的影响和临床方面的影响。材料和方法:52名患有灵活扁平足的儿童(平均年龄8.22.7岁)被纳入研究。比较了支撑鞋垫、感觉运动鞋垫和安慰剂鞋垫。在站立中期通过表面肌电图检测肌肉活动。在入组时以及6个月和12个月后评估外翻指数、足踝残疾指数(FADI)和疼痛。采用混合设计方差分析进行统计评价。结果:在参数Mean方面,与安慰剂鞋垫相比,支撑性和感觉运动鞋垫导致胫骨前肌的活动显著降低。两种类型的治疗鞋垫之间没有发现显著差异。支撑性鞋垫的腓骨长肌振幅参数显著降低。安慰剂鞋垫使外翻指数增加,而两种治疗鞋垫都没有引起任何变化。感觉运动鞋垫引起FADI增加,而支持性和安慰剂鞋垫对该参数没有显著影响。结论:1。支撑鞋垫和感觉运动鞋垫可能会影响小腿的肌肉活动。2.二者均可影响扁平足的纵弓。3.虽然安慰剂鞋垫会导致外翻指数恶化,但这两种治疗鞋垫都可能阻止平足的发展。4.临床研究包括更多的临床方面和长期观察是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja
Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Multistage Reconstructions of Multi-ligamentous Injury in Arthrofibrosis Knee: a Case Report. Outcome of Tibiotalocalcaneal Fusion with Retrograde Hindfoot Nail. Regeneration of Bone and Cartilage Tissue - New Treatment and Rehabilitation Strategy. Results of the Treatment of Carpo-metacarpal Joints Dislocations. The Role of Citrate in Formation of Mineral Structure of Bone.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1