Longitudinal Description and Prediction of Smoking Among Borderline Patients: An 18-Year Follow-Up Study.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Clinical Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.4088/JCP.22m14756
Marcelo J A A Brañas, Frances R Frankenburg, Christina M Temes, Garrett M Fitzmaurice, Mary C Zanarini
{"title":"Longitudinal Description and Prediction of Smoking Among Borderline Patients: An 18-Year Follow-Up Study.","authors":"Marcelo J A A Brañas, Frances R Frankenburg, Christina M Temes, Garrett M Fitzmaurice, Mary C Zanarini","doi":"10.4088/JCP.22m14756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> The objectives of this study were (1) to compare smoking between recovered and non-recovered patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) over the course of 18 years and (2) to assess baseline predictors of tobacco use in patients with BPD.</p><p><p><b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 264 borderline patients were interviewed concerning their smoking history beginning at the 6-year follow-up wave in a longitudinal study of the course of BPD (McLean Study of Adult Development) and re-interviewed at 2-year intervals over the next 18 years. Initial data collection of the larger study happened between June 1992 and December 1995, and the <i>DSM-III-R</i> and the Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB-R) were used as the diagnostic instruments for BPD.</p><p><p><b><i>Results:</i></b> Recovered patients had a 48% lower prevalence of smoking than non-recovered patients at 6-year follow-up (a significant difference; <i>P</i> = .01). Also, the rate of decline in smoking for the recovered group was 68% and was significantly faster (<i>P</i> = .008) than for the non-recovered group over the subsequent 18 years. Alcohol abuse or dependence (relative risk [RR] = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.06-1.40; <i>P</i> = .005), lower levels of education (RR = 1.28; 95% CI, 1.15-1.42; <i>P</i> < .001), and higher levels of the defense mechanism of denial (RR = 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.13; <i>P</i> = .002) were significant predictors of smoking in borderline patients in multivariate analyses.</p><p><p><b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Taken together, the results of this study suggest that recovery status was an important element in the prevalence of smoking among borderline patients over time. They also suggest that smoking was predicted by 3 factors: prior psychopathology, demographics, and psychological maturity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.22m14756","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objectives of this study were (1) to compare smoking between recovered and non-recovered patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) over the course of 18 years and (2) to assess baseline predictors of tobacco use in patients with BPD.

Methods: A total of 264 borderline patients were interviewed concerning their smoking history beginning at the 6-year follow-up wave in a longitudinal study of the course of BPD (McLean Study of Adult Development) and re-interviewed at 2-year intervals over the next 18 years. Initial data collection of the larger study happened between June 1992 and December 1995, and the DSM-III-R and the Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB-R) were used as the diagnostic instruments for BPD.

Results: Recovered patients had a 48% lower prevalence of smoking than non-recovered patients at 6-year follow-up (a significant difference; P = .01). Also, the rate of decline in smoking for the recovered group was 68% and was significantly faster (P = .008) than for the non-recovered group over the subsequent 18 years. Alcohol abuse or dependence (relative risk [RR] = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.06-1.40; P = .005), lower levels of education (RR = 1.28; 95% CI, 1.15-1.42; P < .001), and higher levels of the defense mechanism of denial (RR = 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.13; P = .002) were significant predictors of smoking in borderline patients in multivariate analyses.

Conclusions: Taken together, the results of this study suggest that recovery status was an important element in the prevalence of smoking among borderline patients over time. They also suggest that smoking was predicted by 3 factors: prior psychopathology, demographics, and psychological maturity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
边缘人群吸烟的纵向描述和预测:一项18年随访研究。
目的:本研究的目的是:(1)比较18年来边缘型人格障碍(BPD)康复和未康复患者的吸烟情况;(2)评估BPD患者吸烟的基线预测因素BPD过程的纵向研究(McLean成人发育研究),并在接下来的18年中每隔2年进行一次重新访谈。大规模研究的初始数据收集发生在1992年6月至1995年12月之间,DSM-III-R和修订的边界线诊断访谈(DIB-R)被用作BPD的诊断工具。结果:在6年的随访中,康复患者的吸烟率比未康复患者低48%(显著差异;P = .01)。此外,康复组的吸烟率下降了68%,而且明显更快(P = .008)比未康复组在随后的18年中更高。酗酒或依赖(相对风险[RR] = 1.22;95%可信区间1.06-1.40;P = .005),教育水平较低(RR = 1.28;95%可信区间为1.15-1.42;P P = .002)是多变量分析中临界患者吸烟的重要预测因素。结论:总之,这项研究的结果表明,随着时间的推移,康复状态是边缘患者吸烟患病率的一个重要因素。他们还认为,吸烟是由三个因素预测的:先前的精神病理学、人口统计学和心理成熟度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 75 years, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry has been a leading source of peer-reviewed articles offering the latest information on mental health topics to psychiatrists and other medical professionals.The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry is the leading psychiatric resource for clinical information and covers disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, addiction, posttraumatic stress disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder while exploring the newest advances in diagnosis and treatment.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine/Esketamine in Bipolar Depression in a Clinical Setting. Integrating Previous Suicide Attempts, Gender, and Age Into Suicide Risk Assessment Using Advanced Artificial Intelligence Models. Long-Term Changes in Cognition Among Patients With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders and Different Durations of Illness: A Meta-Analysis. Regression: Understanding What Covariates and Confounds Do in Adjusted Analyses. Diagnostic Assessment via Live Telehealth (Phone or Video) Versus Face-to-Face for the Diagnoses of Psychiatric Conditions: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1