UNMAT: Visual comparison and exploration of uncertainty in large graph sampling

Tan Tang, Sufei Wang, Yunfeng Li, Bohan Li, Yingcai Wu
{"title":"UNMAT: Visual comparison and exploration of uncertainty in large graph sampling","authors":"Tan Tang,&nbsp;Sufei Wang,&nbsp;Yunfeng Li,&nbsp;Bohan Li,&nbsp;Yingcai Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.jvlc.2017.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Graph sampling, simplying the networks while preserving primary graph characteristics, provides a convenient means for exploring large network. During the last few years a variety of graph sampling algorithms have been proposed, and the evaluation and comparison of the algorithms has witnessed a growing interest. Although different tests have been conducted, an important aspect of graph sampling, namely, uncertainty in graph sampling, has been ignored so far. Additionally, existing studies mainly rely on simple statistical analysis and a few relatively small datasets. They may not be applicable to other more complicated graphs with much larger numbers of nodes and edges. Furthermore, while </span>graph clustering is becoming increasingly important, it is still unknown how different sampling algorithms and their associated uncertainty can impact the subsequent graph analysis, such as graph clustering. In this work, we propose an efficient visual analytics framework for measuring the uncertainty from different graph sampling methods and quantifying the influence of the uncertainty in general graph analysis procedures. A spreadsheet-style visualization with rich user interactions is presented to facilitate visual comparison and analysis of multiple graph sampling algorithms. Our framework helps users gain a better understanding of the graph sampling methods in producing uncertainty information. The framework also makes it possible for users to quickly evaluate graph sampling algorithms and select the most appropriate one for their applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54754,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Visual Languages and Computing","volume":"41 ","pages":"Pages 71-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jvlc.2017.05.006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Visual Languages and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045926X16301550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Graph sampling, simplying the networks while preserving primary graph characteristics, provides a convenient means for exploring large network. During the last few years a variety of graph sampling algorithms have been proposed, and the evaluation and comparison of the algorithms has witnessed a growing interest. Although different tests have been conducted, an important aspect of graph sampling, namely, uncertainty in graph sampling, has been ignored so far. Additionally, existing studies mainly rely on simple statistical analysis and a few relatively small datasets. They may not be applicable to other more complicated graphs with much larger numbers of nodes and edges. Furthermore, while graph clustering is becoming increasingly important, it is still unknown how different sampling algorithms and their associated uncertainty can impact the subsequent graph analysis, such as graph clustering. In this work, we propose an efficient visual analytics framework for measuring the uncertainty from different graph sampling methods and quantifying the influence of the uncertainty in general graph analysis procedures. A spreadsheet-style visualization with rich user interactions is presented to facilitate visual comparison and analysis of multiple graph sampling algorithms. Our framework helps users gain a better understanding of the graph sampling methods in producing uncertainty information. The framework also makes it possible for users to quickly evaluate graph sampling algorithms and select the most appropriate one for their applications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
UNMAT:大图形采样中不确定性的可视化比较和探索
图采样简化了网络,同时保留了主要的图特征,为探索大型网络提供了一种方便的方法。在过去的几年里,人们提出了各种各样的图采样算法,对这些算法的评估和比较越来越引起人们的兴趣。尽管已经进行了不同的测试,但到目前为止,图采样的一个重要方面,即图采样的不确定性,一直被忽视。此外,现有的研究主要依赖于简单的统计分析和一些相对较小的数据集。它们可能不适用于具有大量节点和边的其他更复杂的图。此外,尽管图聚类变得越来越重要,但不同的采样算法及其相关的不确定性如何影响后续的图分析(如图聚类)仍然是未知的。在这项工作中,我们提出了一个有效的视觉分析框架,用于测量不同图形采样方法的不确定性,并量化一般图形分析程序中不确定性的影响。提出了一种具有丰富用户交互的电子表格风格的可视化,以便于对多种图形采样算法进行可视化比较和分析。我们的框架帮助用户更好地理解生成不确定性信息的图形采样方法。该框架还允许用户快速评估图采样算法,并为其应用程序选择最合适的算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Visual Languages and Computing
Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
1.62
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26.8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Visual Languages and Computing is a forum for researchers, practitioners, and developers to exchange ideas and results for the advancement of visual languages and its implication to the art of computing. The journal publishes research papers, state-of-the-art surveys, and review articles in all aspects of visual languages.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Error recovery in parsing expression grammars through labeled failures and its implementation based on a parsing machine Visual augmentation of source code editors: A systematic mapping study Optimizing type-specific instrumentation on the JVM with reflective supertype information Qualitative representation of spatio-temporal knowledge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1