Reprint of: Development of vaccines and vaccinal strategies against COVID-19: The information contributing to shared decision-making

Sébastien Bruel , Amandine Gagneux-Brunon , Rodolphe Charles , Xavier Gocko , Élisabeth Botelho-Nevers
{"title":"Reprint of: Development of vaccines and vaccinal strategies against COVID-19: The information contributing to shared decision-making","authors":"Sébastien Bruel ,&nbsp;Amandine Gagneux-Brunon ,&nbsp;Rodolphe Charles ,&nbsp;Xavier Gocko ,&nbsp;Élisabeth Botelho-Nevers","doi":"10.1016/j.lpmope.2022.100024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The public has many questions about COVID-19 vaccines. The informing of general practitioners and other vaccinators provides healthcare users with clear and reliable information conducive to shared decision-making. While they constitute a bulwark against widespread vaccine hesitancy, informative supports can be tainted by doubt if they are not backed up by solid arguments convincingly addressing the manifold questions and concerns of healthcare users.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100860,"journal":{"name":"La Presse Médicale Open","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100024"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590250422000047/pdfft?md5=6587184efe06e88d3e0015e595df2428&pid=1-s2.0-S2590250422000047-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"La Presse Médicale Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590250422000047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The public has many questions about COVID-19 vaccines. The informing of general practitioners and other vaccinators provides healthcare users with clear and reliable information conducive to shared decision-making. While they constitute a bulwark against widespread vaccine hesitancy, informative supports can be tainted by doubt if they are not backed up by solid arguments convincingly addressing the manifold questions and concerns of healthcare users.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转载:新冠肺炎疫苗和疫苗战略的开发:有助于共同决策的信息
公众对新冠肺炎疫苗有很多疑问。全科医生和其他疫苗接种者的信息为医疗保健用户提供了清晰可靠的信息,有助于共享决策。虽然它们构成了对抗广泛的疫苗犹豫的堡垒,但如果没有确凿的论据来令人信服地解决医疗保健用户的多方面问题和担忧,信息支持可能会受到怀疑的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents Enhancing critical thinking in medical education: A narrative review of current practices, challenges, and future perspectives in context of infodemics Planetary health: Physicians must tackle microplastics Management of major depressive disorders in pregnant or breastfeeding women in primary care: A systematic meta-review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1