The Active Glossary: taking integration seriously

Georg Klinker, David Marques, John McDermott
{"title":"The Active Glossary: taking integration seriously","authors":"Georg Klinker,&nbsp;David Marques,&nbsp;John McDermott","doi":"10.1006/knac.1993.1007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Developing automated support for any workplace involves analysing a workplace, designing a problem-solving approach and knowledge base, populating that knowledge base with information required by the problem-solving approach, and introducing the new support into the workplace. Each of these development phases produces different components of the solution for supporting a workplace. Existing knowledge-acquisition tools support only a subset of the development phases, and the solution components they generate are not integrated: it is left to the developer to create and maintain a mapping between the different solution components resulting from the different development phases. A current trend in knowledge acquisition is to move towards coherent knowledge-engineering environments supporting the entire solution-development cycle. This emphasizes the need for tools that assist developers with integrating the different solution components produced by the knowledge-engineering environment into a coherent system. This paper introduces such an integration tool: the Active Glossary. The Active Glossary is part of the Spark, Burn, FireFighter knowledge-engineering environment. It assists a development team with describing workplaces and programming constructs so that their similarities and differences are made explicit. The result is an explicit mapping between the outcome of a workplace analysis and the design of a problem-solving approach. The Active Glossary further assists the development team with exploiting the similarities for the purpose of reusing previously defined workplace descriptions and programming constructs for new situations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100857,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Acquisition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1006/knac.1993.1007","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Acquisition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1042814383710071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Developing automated support for any workplace involves analysing a workplace, designing a problem-solving approach and knowledge base, populating that knowledge base with information required by the problem-solving approach, and introducing the new support into the workplace. Each of these development phases produces different components of the solution for supporting a workplace. Existing knowledge-acquisition tools support only a subset of the development phases, and the solution components they generate are not integrated: it is left to the developer to create and maintain a mapping between the different solution components resulting from the different development phases. A current trend in knowledge acquisition is to move towards coherent knowledge-engineering environments supporting the entire solution-development cycle. This emphasizes the need for tools that assist developers with integrating the different solution components produced by the knowledge-engineering environment into a coherent system. This paper introduces such an integration tool: the Active Glossary. The Active Glossary is part of the Spark, Burn, FireFighter knowledge-engineering environment. It assists a development team with describing workplaces and programming constructs so that their similarities and differences are made explicit. The result is an explicit mapping between the outcome of a workplace analysis and the design of a problem-solving approach. The Active Glossary further assists the development team with exploiting the similarities for the purpose of reusing previously defined workplace descriptions and programming constructs for new situations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Active Glossary:认真对待集成
为任何工作场所开发自动化支持包括分析工作场所,设计解决问题的方法和知识库,用解决问题方法所需的信息填充知识库,并将新的支持引入工作场所。这些开发阶段中的每一个都会生成用于支持工作场所的解决方案的不同组件。现有的知识获取工具只支持开发阶段的一个子集,它们生成的解决方案组件没有集成:由开发人员创建和维护不同开发阶段产生的不同解决方案组件之间的映射。当前知识获取的趋势是朝着支持整个解决方案开发周期的连贯知识工程环境发展。这强调了对帮助开发人员将知识工程环境产生的不同解决方案组件集成到一个连贯系统中的工具的需求。本文介绍了这样一个集成工具:Active Glossary。Active Glossary是Spark、Burn、FireFighter知识工程环境的一部分。它帮助开发团队描述工作场所和编程结构,以便明确它们的相似之处和差异。其结果是工作场所分析的结果和解决问题方法的设计之间的明确映射。Active Glossary进一步帮助开发团队利用相似性,以便在新情况下重用以前定义的工作场所描述和编程结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The semantics of KBSSF, a language for KBS design Foundations for a methodology for medical KBS development What online machine learning can do for knowledge acquisition—a case study Apology and correction Configuring problem-solving methods: a CAKE perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1