Recherche évaluative en chirurgie esthétique maxillofaciale

J.-P. Meningaud , G. Toure
{"title":"Recherche évaluative en chirurgie esthétique maxillofaciale","authors":"J.-P. Meningaud ,&nbsp;G. Toure","doi":"10.1016/j.emcden.2004.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The outcome research, like the clinical research, examines the end results of medical interventions. However, unlike clinical research, the outcome research systematically considers outcomes from the patient’s perspective. Therefore, assessments do not focus on physical data or laboratory test, but on the patient’s feelings. This approach is essential in cosmetic surgery where the main outcome is psychological and subjective rather than functional. Outcome research is useful in solving the ethical problem of the risk-benefit ratio in cosmetic surgery. Parallel to its evolution and advances, it should allow a better definition of the indications for cosmetic surgery. In outcome research, the assessment may be an index of satisfaction, a scale for quality of life, or a scale for psychological evaluation. Satisfaction indexes present a great advantage related to their simplicity, but such easiness of response constitutes also a limitation. They are essentially based on visual analogue scales such as those commonly used to assess pain. Evaluation tests for quality of life assessment include in a single score several dimensions such as physical condition, and social, psychological, and emotional criteria. Specific tests take into account the pathology or the need for care as asked by the patient, such as cosmetic surgery. Generic health status tests focus on the quantification of overall quality of life independently from the patient’s demand; this makes them less biased. Finally, psychological scales are the most commonly used due to the psychological aspect of a need for cosmetic surgery. They screen depression, anxiety, etc. A literature review revealed that maxillofacial surgery doesn’t improve depression indexes. It improves significantly self-confidence, self-esteem, and physical self-image. Cosmetic surgery improves the results of generic or specific tests for quality of life assessment, provided these tests include some of such psychological parameters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100419,"journal":{"name":"EMC - Dentisterie","volume":"1 3","pages":"Pages 326-333"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.emcden.2004.03.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMC - Dentisterie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1762566104000601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The outcome research, like the clinical research, examines the end results of medical interventions. However, unlike clinical research, the outcome research systematically considers outcomes from the patient’s perspective. Therefore, assessments do not focus on physical data or laboratory test, but on the patient’s feelings. This approach is essential in cosmetic surgery where the main outcome is psychological and subjective rather than functional. Outcome research is useful in solving the ethical problem of the risk-benefit ratio in cosmetic surgery. Parallel to its evolution and advances, it should allow a better definition of the indications for cosmetic surgery. In outcome research, the assessment may be an index of satisfaction, a scale for quality of life, or a scale for psychological evaluation. Satisfaction indexes present a great advantage related to their simplicity, but such easiness of response constitutes also a limitation. They are essentially based on visual analogue scales such as those commonly used to assess pain. Evaluation tests for quality of life assessment include in a single score several dimensions such as physical condition, and social, psychological, and emotional criteria. Specific tests take into account the pathology or the need for care as asked by the patient, such as cosmetic surgery. Generic health status tests focus on the quantification of overall quality of life independently from the patient’s demand; this makes them less biased. Finally, psychological scales are the most commonly used due to the psychological aspect of a need for cosmetic surgery. They screen depression, anxiety, etc. A literature review revealed that maxillofacial surgery doesn’t improve depression indexes. It improves significantly self-confidence, self-esteem, and physical self-image. Cosmetic surgery improves the results of generic or specific tests for quality of life assessment, provided these tests include some of such psychological parameters.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颌面美容外科评估研究
结果研究与临床研究一样,检查医疗干预的最终结果。然而,与临床研究不同,结果研究系统地从患者的角度考虑结果。因此,评估不关注身体数据或实验室测试,而是关注患者的感受。这种方法在美容手术中至关重要,因为美容手术的主要结果是心理和主观的,而不是功能性的。结果研究有助于解决整容手术风险收益比的伦理问题。在其发展和进步的同时,它应该能够更好地定义整容手术的适应症。在结果研究中,评估可以是满意度指数、生活质量量表或心理评估量表。满意度指数由于其简单性而具有很大的优势,但这种反应的容易性也是一个局限性。它们基本上是基于视觉模拟量表,例如通常用于评估疼痛的量表。生活质量评估的评估测试在一个分数中包括几个维度,如身体状况、社会、心理和情感标准。特定的检查会考虑患者的病理或护理需求,如整容手术。一般健康状况测试侧重于独立于患者需求的整体生活质量的量化;这就减少了他们的偏见。最后,心理量表是最常用的,因为需要整容手术的心理方面。他们筛查抑郁症、焦虑症等。一项文献综述显示,颌面外科手术并不能改善抑郁症指数。它能显著提高自信、自尊和身体自我形象。整容手术可以改善生活质量评估的通用或特定测试的结果,前提是这些测试包括一些这样的心理参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dents artificielles et prothse amovible Implications de la slection et du placement des brackets sur les dtails des finitions Restauration fonctionnelle par ajustement occlusal CV2 - Editorial board index mots clés 2004
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1