Preferences and organization structure: Toward behavioral economics micro-foundations of organizational analysis

Avner Ben-Ner
{"title":"Preferences and organization structure: Toward behavioral economics micro-foundations of organizational analysis","authors":"Avner Ben-Ner","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2013.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The paper proposes micro-foundations for organizational analysis grounded in behavioral economics. As <span>Simon (1985)</span> pointed out it, “nothing is more fundamental in setting our research agenda and informing our research methods than our view of the nature of the human beings whose behavior we are studying.” The paper examines optimal workplace-level organization structure (decision-making delegation, incentives and monitoring) relative to four common types of individuals, <em>just selfish</em>, <em>civil</em>, <em>decent</em> and <em>dedicated</em> employees (characterized in terms of their social preferences, self- versus other-regarding, reciprocity, trusting and trustworthiness). Four principal propositions arise from this analysis. (1) Mismatch between organization structure and employee preferences reduces productivity and profits. (2) The less prosocial employees in an organization, the more complex and sophisticated and therefore expensive the organization structure must be. (3) The less complex and less interdependent are employees’ tasks, the less dependent is organization structure on employee social preferences. (4) Heterogeneity of preferences poses a design a dynamic challenge as practices generally have to be tailored to one type of employee, and will be associated with exit of other types or adverse-selection by types that will seek to exploit it.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88732,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of socio-economics","volume":"46 ","pages":"Pages 87-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.socec.2013.08.003","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of socio-economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053535713001182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

The paper proposes micro-foundations for organizational analysis grounded in behavioral economics. As Simon (1985) pointed out it, “nothing is more fundamental in setting our research agenda and informing our research methods than our view of the nature of the human beings whose behavior we are studying.” The paper examines optimal workplace-level organization structure (decision-making delegation, incentives and monitoring) relative to four common types of individuals, just selfish, civil, decent and dedicated employees (characterized in terms of their social preferences, self- versus other-regarding, reciprocity, trusting and trustworthiness). Four principal propositions arise from this analysis. (1) Mismatch between organization structure and employee preferences reduces productivity and profits. (2) The less prosocial employees in an organization, the more complex and sophisticated and therefore expensive the organization structure must be. (3) The less complex and less interdependent are employees’ tasks, the less dependent is organization structure on employee social preferences. (4) Heterogeneity of preferences poses a design a dynamic challenge as practices generally have to be tailored to one type of employee, and will be associated with exit of other types or adverse-selection by types that will seek to exploit it.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
偏好与组织结构:走向行为经济学组织分析的微观基础
本文提出了基于行为经济学的组织分析的微观基础。正如Simon(1985)所指出的,“在制定我们的研究议程和为我们的研究方法提供信息方面,没有什么比我们对我们正在研究的行为的人类本质的看法更重要了。”,体面和敬业的员工(以他们的社会偏好、自我与他人的关系、互惠、信任和可信度为特征)。这一分析提出了四个主要命题。(1) 组织结构和员工偏好之间的不匹配会降低生产力和利润。(2) 组织中亲社会的员工越少,组织结构就越复杂、复杂,因此成本也就越高。(3)员工的任务越不复杂、相互依赖性越低,组织结构对员工社会偏好的依赖性就越低。(4) 偏好的异质性给设计带来了动态挑战,因为实践通常必须针对一种类型的员工进行定制,并将与其他类型的退出或寻求利用它的类型的不利选择相关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Time preferences and overconfident beliefs: Evidence from germany The development of social strategic ignorance and other regarding behavior from childhood to adulthood How closely related are financial satisfaction and subjective well-being? Systematic review and meta-analysis Heterogeneous motivation and cognitive ability in the lab Using involvement to reduce inconsistencies in risk preference elicitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1