On the tectonic position of the Baoshan region during the Late Palaeozoic

Wang Xunlian , Kato Makoto , Wang Hongzhen
{"title":"On the tectonic position of the Baoshan region during the Late Palaeozoic","authors":"Wang Xunlian ,&nbsp;Kato Makoto ,&nbsp;Wang Hongzhen","doi":"10.1016/0743-9547(96)00023-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this study is to discuss the tectonic position of Baoshan in Yunnan Province, China, during the Late Paleozoic by comparison of the sedimentary facies, fauna and palaeomagnetic data from the Baoshan region with those from the Yangtze region and southern Tibet. The sedimentary facies change suggests that in the Late Palaeozoic the Baoshan region underwent a similar geological history to southern Tibet, but different from that of the Yangtze region. The rugose corals and brachiopods as well as vertebrates of Baoshan are different from those of the Yangtze region during the Late Palaeozoic. An evident segregation seems to exist between them. The Late Paleozoic fauna of Baoshan shows certain similarities to southern Tibet. The Devonian and Late Carboniferous faunas, especially, are very similar to those in southern Tibet. This indicates that there was no evident segregation between them in the Late Palaeozoic. The palaeomagnetic data reveal that in the Late Palaeozoic the Yangtze region was close to the equator, while the Baoshan region and southern Tibet were situated in the middle latitudes.</p><p>On the basis of the palaeontological, sedimentological and palaeomagnetic data, it is inferred that Baoshan and southern Tibet were situated in the same continental margin, and both regions were far from the Yangtze region during the Late Paleozoic. The Baoshan region may be considered as a massif within the Gondwana tectonic domain which includes southern Tibet, while the Yangtze region was located in another tectonic domain—the South Asian domain, with a wide ocean, the Tethys between them.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":85022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southeast Asian earth sciences","volume":"13 3","pages":"Pages 171-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0743-9547(96)00023-2","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southeast Asian earth sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0743954796000232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The aim of this study is to discuss the tectonic position of Baoshan in Yunnan Province, China, during the Late Paleozoic by comparison of the sedimentary facies, fauna and palaeomagnetic data from the Baoshan region with those from the Yangtze region and southern Tibet. The sedimentary facies change suggests that in the Late Palaeozoic the Baoshan region underwent a similar geological history to southern Tibet, but different from that of the Yangtze region. The rugose corals and brachiopods as well as vertebrates of Baoshan are different from those of the Yangtze region during the Late Palaeozoic. An evident segregation seems to exist between them. The Late Paleozoic fauna of Baoshan shows certain similarities to southern Tibet. The Devonian and Late Carboniferous faunas, especially, are very similar to those in southern Tibet. This indicates that there was no evident segregation between them in the Late Palaeozoic. The palaeomagnetic data reveal that in the Late Palaeozoic the Yangtze region was close to the equator, while the Baoshan region and southern Tibet were situated in the middle latitudes.

On the basis of the palaeontological, sedimentological and palaeomagnetic data, it is inferred that Baoshan and southern Tibet were situated in the same continental margin, and both regions were far from the Yangtze region during the Late Paleozoic. The Baoshan region may be considered as a massif within the Gondwana tectonic domain which includes southern Tibet, while the Yangtze region was located in another tectonic domain—the South Asian domain, with a wide ocean, the Tethys between them.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论宝山地区晚古生代的构造位置
通过对云南保山地区与长江、藏南地区沉积相、动物群和古地磁资料的比较,探讨云南保山晚古生代的构造位置。沉积相的变化表明,晚古生代宝山地区的地质历史与藏南地区相似,但与扬子地区不同。宝山地区晚古生代的珊瑚、腕足类和脊椎动物与长江地区不同。他们之间似乎存在明显的隔离。宝山晚古生代动物群与藏南地区有一定的相似性。尤其是泥盆纪和晚石炭世的动物群与藏南地区的动物群非常相似。这表明它们在晚古生代没有明显的分离。古地磁资料表明,晚古生代扬子地区靠近赤道,保山地区和藏南地区位于中纬度。根据古生物学、沉积学和古地磁资料,推断宝山和藏南地区在晚古生代处于同一大陆边缘,且均远离长江地区。保山地区可能被认为是冈瓦纳大陆构造域(包括西藏南部)内的一个地块,而长江地区则位于另一个构造域——南亚域,两者之间有广阔的海洋特提斯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Announcements Variation in forearc basin development along the Sunda Arc, Indonesia Thermal histories of Tertiary sediments in western central Sumatra, Indonesia Lead-210 and plutonium fallout in Taiwan as recorded at a subalpine lake Marine Jurassic lithostratigraphy of Thailand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1