The disposition to become an entrepreneur and the jacks-of-all-trades in social and human capital

Uschi Backes-Gellner , Petra Moog
{"title":"The disposition to become an entrepreneur and the jacks-of-all-trades in social and human capital","authors":"Uschi Backes-Gellner ,&nbsp;Petra Moog","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2013.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper studies how an individual's composition of human and social capital affects his or her disposition to become an entrepreneur. Our theoretical analysis is an extension of <span>Lazear's (2005)</span> jack-of-all-trades theory in combination with the idea of bricolage of experiences and their effectuation in the disposition to become an entrepreneur. Our primary conclusion is that it is not individuals with a higher level of human or social capital but rather individuals with a more balanced and combined portfolio of human capital, social capital and experiences that are more disposed than others to become entrepreneurs. We use survey data from a sample of more than 2000 German students to test this hypothesis and find that the jacks-of-all-trades, i.e., individuals who are more balancing and combining different skills rather than specializing in a few, are more likely to become entrepreneurs. On the other hand, the masters-of-one, i.e., the specialists, are better off being employees and rightly prefer to do so.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88732,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of socio-economics","volume":"47 ","pages":"Pages 55-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.socec.2013.08.008","citationCount":"58","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of socio-economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053535713001236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

Abstract

This paper studies how an individual's composition of human and social capital affects his or her disposition to become an entrepreneur. Our theoretical analysis is an extension of Lazear's (2005) jack-of-all-trades theory in combination with the idea of bricolage of experiences and their effectuation in the disposition to become an entrepreneur. Our primary conclusion is that it is not individuals with a higher level of human or social capital but rather individuals with a more balanced and combined portfolio of human capital, social capital and experiences that are more disposed than others to become entrepreneurs. We use survey data from a sample of more than 2000 German students to test this hypothesis and find that the jacks-of-all-trades, i.e., individuals who are more balancing and combining different skills rather than specializing in a few, are more likely to become entrepreneurs. On the other hand, the masters-of-one, i.e., the specialists, are better off being employees and rightly prefer to do so.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成为企业家的倾向以及社会资本和人力资本的各行各业
本文研究了一个人的人力资本和社会资本构成如何影响他或她成为企业家的倾向。我们的理论分析是Lazear(2005)的万事通理论的延伸,结合了拼凑经验的想法及其在成为企业家的过程中的作用。我们的主要结论是,不是拥有更高水平人力或社会资本的个人,而是拥有更平衡、更综合的人力资本、社会资本和经验组合的个人比其他人更倾向于成为企业家。我们使用2000多名德国学生的调查数据来检验这一假设,发现各行各业的人才,即更善于平衡和结合不同技能而不是专门从事少数技能的人,更有可能成为企业家。另一方面,一个人的主人,即专家,最好是雇员,并且理所当然地喜欢这样做。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Time preferences and overconfident beliefs: Evidence from germany The development of social strategic ignorance and other regarding behavior from childhood to adulthood How closely related are financial satisfaction and subjective well-being? Systematic review and meta-analysis Heterogeneous motivation and cognitive ability in the lab Using involvement to reduce inconsistencies in risk preference elicitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1