{"title":"Surge-tectonic evolution of southeastern Asia: a geohydrodynamics approach","authors":"Arthur A. Meyerhoff","doi":"10.1016/0743-9547(95)00028-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The repeated need for <em>ad hoc</em> modifications in plate-tectonic models to explain the evolution of southeastern Asia reveals their inability to fully explain the complex features and dynamics of this region. As one example, the hypothesis does not provide a mechanism to explain the 180° turns and twists along the strike of several foldbelts and island arcs in the region (e.g. Banda arc). Convection-cell configuration renders such 180° contortions and Rayleigh-Bénard-type convection impossible. However, during the last 10 years, new data bearing on the convection-cell problem have become available in the form of seismotomographic images of the earth's interior. These images show that (i) mantle diapirs as proposed by traditional plate-tectonic models do not exist; (ii) there is no discernible pattern of upper or lower mantle convection, and thus no longer an adequate mechanism to move plates; and (iii) the lithosphere above a depth of about 80 km is permeated by an interconnected network of low-velocity channels.</p><p>Seismic-reflection studies of the low-velocity channels discovered on the seismotomographic images reveal that these channels have walls with a 7.1–7.8 km s<sup>−1</sup> P-wave velocity. Commonly, the interiors of the channels are acoustically transparent, with much slower P-wave velocities, in places as low as 5.4 km s<sup>−1</sup>. The author and co-workers have interpreted the low velocities as evidence for the presence of partial melt in the channels, and they postulated that this melt moves preferentially eastward as a result of the earth's rotation. They named these channels “surge channels” and their new hypothesis for earth dynamics “surge tectonics”.</p><p>Surge channels underlie every type of tectonic belt, which includes mid-ocean ridges, aseismic ridges, continental rifts, strike-slip fracture zones, and foldbelts. In southeastern Asia, surge channels—mainly foldbelts—lie between all platform and cratonic massifs. These massifs, platforms, and tectonics belts—the surge channels—form an anastomosing E-W pattern southern Asiatic Russia, Mongolia, western China, the Qinghai-Tibetan region, and northern India and Pakistan. Such an anastomosing pattern indicates that flow is an active process in the surge channels.</p><p>Surface studies of phenomena that might be associated with the surge channels soon revealed that all active channels are characterized by higher-than-normal heat flow (> 55 mW m<sup>−2</sup>, thermal springs and elevated ground-water temperatures, volvanic phenomena, bands of microearthquakes, and linear belts of faults, fractures, and fissures. The latter are especially visible on satellite images. The bands of high heat flow, thermal springs, microearthquakes, and faults-fractures-fissures almost exactly coincide. The fault-fracture-fissure systems are interpreted to be streamlines caused by flow in the surge channels—a consequence of Stokes's Law (an expression of Newton's Second Law of Motion)-and show that Poiseuille flow must dominate in the channels. Hence, the mechanism producing the belts of linear faults-fractures-fissures is viscous drag, produced by fluid motions.</p><p>The eastward flow of the magma in the channels is demonstrated clearly in the tectonic patterns of southeastern Asia. In the northern part of the region studied, the E-W striking anastomosing surge channels (tectonic belts) splay northeastward into the coastal regions of Russia. In the south, they splay southward and southeastward through the Malay Peninsula and Indonesia. The open horsetail structures thus created prove that flow is W-E. The presence of the two splay directions, NE and S-SE, indicates in addition that a barrier to eastward flow must lie directly east of Asia. In this author's opinion, this barrier is the existing Benioff zone, because the same NE and S-SE splay patterns are present on each of the paleotectonic maps that have been prepared for nine time intervals from the beginning of Sinian (latest Proterozoic) time to the present.</p><p>The presence of the W-E flow patterns through 850 Ma of geological time, patterns that remain essentially unchanged, means simply that tectonic explanations of Asian geology need revision. The patterns that have been mapped indicate that W-E flow across Asia has persisted essentially unchanged for 850 Ma. Surge tectonics is the only hypothesis yet proposed that explains these patterns and their persistence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":85022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southeast Asian earth sciences","volume":"12 3","pages":"Pages 145-247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0743-9547(95)00028-3","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southeast Asian earth sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0743954795000283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
The repeated need for ad hoc modifications in plate-tectonic models to explain the evolution of southeastern Asia reveals their inability to fully explain the complex features and dynamics of this region. As one example, the hypothesis does not provide a mechanism to explain the 180° turns and twists along the strike of several foldbelts and island arcs in the region (e.g. Banda arc). Convection-cell configuration renders such 180° contortions and Rayleigh-Bénard-type convection impossible. However, during the last 10 years, new data bearing on the convection-cell problem have become available in the form of seismotomographic images of the earth's interior. These images show that (i) mantle diapirs as proposed by traditional plate-tectonic models do not exist; (ii) there is no discernible pattern of upper or lower mantle convection, and thus no longer an adequate mechanism to move plates; and (iii) the lithosphere above a depth of about 80 km is permeated by an interconnected network of low-velocity channels.
Seismic-reflection studies of the low-velocity channels discovered on the seismotomographic images reveal that these channels have walls with a 7.1–7.8 km s−1 P-wave velocity. Commonly, the interiors of the channels are acoustically transparent, with much slower P-wave velocities, in places as low as 5.4 km s−1. The author and co-workers have interpreted the low velocities as evidence for the presence of partial melt in the channels, and they postulated that this melt moves preferentially eastward as a result of the earth's rotation. They named these channels “surge channels” and their new hypothesis for earth dynamics “surge tectonics”.
Surge channels underlie every type of tectonic belt, which includes mid-ocean ridges, aseismic ridges, continental rifts, strike-slip fracture zones, and foldbelts. In southeastern Asia, surge channels—mainly foldbelts—lie between all platform and cratonic massifs. These massifs, platforms, and tectonics belts—the surge channels—form an anastomosing E-W pattern southern Asiatic Russia, Mongolia, western China, the Qinghai-Tibetan region, and northern India and Pakistan. Such an anastomosing pattern indicates that flow is an active process in the surge channels.
Surface studies of phenomena that might be associated with the surge channels soon revealed that all active channels are characterized by higher-than-normal heat flow (> 55 mW m−2, thermal springs and elevated ground-water temperatures, volvanic phenomena, bands of microearthquakes, and linear belts of faults, fractures, and fissures. The latter are especially visible on satellite images. The bands of high heat flow, thermal springs, microearthquakes, and faults-fractures-fissures almost exactly coincide. The fault-fracture-fissure systems are interpreted to be streamlines caused by flow in the surge channels—a consequence of Stokes's Law (an expression of Newton's Second Law of Motion)-and show that Poiseuille flow must dominate in the channels. Hence, the mechanism producing the belts of linear faults-fractures-fissures is viscous drag, produced by fluid motions.
The eastward flow of the magma in the channels is demonstrated clearly in the tectonic patterns of southeastern Asia. In the northern part of the region studied, the E-W striking anastomosing surge channels (tectonic belts) splay northeastward into the coastal regions of Russia. In the south, they splay southward and southeastward through the Malay Peninsula and Indonesia. The open horsetail structures thus created prove that flow is W-E. The presence of the two splay directions, NE and S-SE, indicates in addition that a barrier to eastward flow must lie directly east of Asia. In this author's opinion, this barrier is the existing Benioff zone, because the same NE and S-SE splay patterns are present on each of the paleotectonic maps that have been prepared for nine time intervals from the beginning of Sinian (latest Proterozoic) time to the present.
The presence of the W-E flow patterns through 850 Ma of geological time, patterns that remain essentially unchanged, means simply that tectonic explanations of Asian geology need revision. The patterns that have been mapped indicate that W-E flow across Asia has persisted essentially unchanged for 850 Ma. Surge tectonics is the only hypothesis yet proposed that explains these patterns and their persistence.
反复需要对板块构造模型进行特别修改来解释东南亚的演变,这表明它们无法完全解释该地区的复杂特征和动力学。例如,该假设没有提供一种机制来解释该地区几个褶皱带和岛弧(如班达弧)走向上的180°转弯和扭曲。对流单元的配置使得这种180°的扭曲和Rayleigh-Bénard型对流不可能实现。然而,在过去的10年里,有关对流单元问题的新数据已经以地球内部地震断层图像的形式出现。这些图像表明:(1)传统板块构造模型提出的地幔底辟不存在;(ii)上地幔或下地幔对流没有明显的模式,因此不再是移动板块的适当机制;以及(iii)深度约80公里以上的岩石圈被相互连接的低速通道网络渗透。对地震断层图像上发现的低速通道的地震反射研究表明,这些通道的壁具有7.1–7.8 km s−1的P波速度。通常,在低至5.4 km s−1的地方,通道内部是声学透明的,P波速度要慢得多。作者及其同事将低速度解释为通道中存在部分熔体的证据,他们假设,由于地球自转,这种熔体优先向东移动。他们将这些通道命名为“涌浪通道”,并将他们对地球动力学的新假设命名为“浪涌构造”。涌浪通道是各种类型构造带的基础,包括大洋中脊、抗震脊、大陆裂谷、走滑断裂带和褶皱带。在东南亚,浪涌通道——主要是褶皱带——位于所有平台和克拉通地块之间。这些地块、平台和构造带——涌浪通道——形成了一个网状的东西向格局——亚洲南部的俄罗斯、蒙古、中国西部、青藏地区以及印度和巴基斯坦北部。这种网状模式表明,涌浪通道中的水流是一个活跃的过程。对可能与浪涌通道有关的现象的表面研究很快表明,所有活跃通道的特征都是热流高于正常值(>;55 mW m−2,温泉和地下水温度升高,火山现象,微地震带,以及断层、裂缝和裂缝的线性带。后者在卫星图像上尤其明显。高热流带、温泉、微地震和断层-裂缝-裂缝几乎完全一致。断层-裂缝系统被解释为是由涌浪通道中的流动引起的流线——斯托克斯定律(牛顿第二运动定律的一种表达式)的结果——并表明Poiseuille流必须在通道中占主导地位。因此,产生线性断层-裂缝带的机制是流体运动产生的粘性阻力。岩浆在通道中向东流动在东南亚的构造格局中表现得很清楚。在所研究区域的北部,东西走向的网状涌浪通道(构造带)向东北方向张开,进入俄罗斯沿海地区。在南部,它们向南和东南延伸,穿过马来半岛和印度尼西亚。由此产生的开放马尾结构证明了流动是W-E。NE和S-SE两个扇向的存在表明,向东流动的障碍必须直接位于亚洲东部。在作者看来,这个屏障就是现有的贝尼奥夫带,因为从震旦纪(最晚元古代)开始到现在,在九个时间间隔内绘制的每一张古构造图上都存在相同的NE和s-SE扇模式。850 Ma地质时期W-E流动模式的存在,基本上保持不变,这意味着亚洲地质的构造解释需要修正。绘制的模式表明,亚洲各地的W-E流在850 Ma内基本保持不变。浪涌构造是迄今为止唯一提出的解释这些模式及其持续性的假设。