An analysis of Dow 30 global core indicator disclosures and environmental, social, and governance-related ratings

IF 9.4 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting Pub Date : 2020-09-09 DOI:10.1111/jifm.12123
Christopher G. Calvin, Donna L. Street
{"title":"An analysis of Dow 30 global core indicator disclosures and environmental, social, and governance-related ratings","authors":"Christopher G. Calvin,&nbsp;Donna L. Street","doi":"10.1111/jifm.12123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We examine the extent to which US Dow 30 companies disclose the Global Core Indicators (GCIs), which are measures to assess companies’ contribution toward the United Nation’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. We find that the Dow 30 are generally compliant with disclosing GCIs that align with US capital market reporting expectations, high-profile current events, and issues that are financially relevant. We also find the Dow 30 are more likely to disclose institutional and economic issues, rather than environmental and social issues, and note disclosure variation across industries in which the Dow 30 operate. Supplemental analyses indicate that GCI disclosure levels are generally higher when those GCIs are associated with financially relevant ESG issues, suggesting companies are more amenable to addressing sustainability when doing so aligns with their mandate to shareholders. Correlation analyses reveal that the GCI indices moderately or strongly correlate with two of three MSCI sustainability ratings, highlighting companies’ focus on financially relevant areas, and weakly correlate with companies’ CDP climate change ratings, highlighting the limited scope of the GCIs in capturing detailed environmentally focused sustainability efforts. We also show that the MSCI sustainability ratings of the Dow 30 have generally trended higher over time, with increases driven by companies in the manufacturing, financial, and retail industries. Our findings help fill a void in sustainability literature on US company reporting of the GCIs and may be informative to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development as it reviews the GCIs in support of the 2030 Agenda.</p>","PeriodicalId":46659,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting","volume":"31 3","pages":"323-349"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jifm.12123","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jifm.12123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

We examine the extent to which US Dow 30 companies disclose the Global Core Indicators (GCIs), which are measures to assess companies’ contribution toward the United Nation’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. We find that the Dow 30 are generally compliant with disclosing GCIs that align with US capital market reporting expectations, high-profile current events, and issues that are financially relevant. We also find the Dow 30 are more likely to disclose institutional and economic issues, rather than environmental and social issues, and note disclosure variation across industries in which the Dow 30 operate. Supplemental analyses indicate that GCI disclosure levels are generally higher when those GCIs are associated with financially relevant ESG issues, suggesting companies are more amenable to addressing sustainability when doing so aligns with their mandate to shareholders. Correlation analyses reveal that the GCI indices moderately or strongly correlate with two of three MSCI sustainability ratings, highlighting companies’ focus on financially relevant areas, and weakly correlate with companies’ CDP climate change ratings, highlighting the limited scope of the GCIs in capturing detailed environmentally focused sustainability efforts. We also show that the MSCI sustainability ratings of the Dow 30 have generally trended higher over time, with increases driven by companies in the manufacturing, financial, and retail industries. Our findings help fill a void in sustainability literature on US company reporting of the GCIs and may be informative to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development as it reviews the GCIs in support of the 2030 Agenda.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
道琼斯30指数全球核心指标披露及环境、社会和治理相关评级分析
我们研究了美国道琼斯30指数成分股公司披露全球核心指标的程度,这些指标是评估公司对联合国2030年可持续发展议程贡献的指标。我们发现,道琼斯30指数通常符合披露的GCI,这些GCI与美国资本市场报告预期、备受瞩目的时事和财务相关问题相一致。我们还发现,道琼斯30指数更有可能披露机构和经济问题,而不是环境和社会问题,并注意到道琼斯30指数所处行业的披露差异。补充分析表明,当GCI与财务相关的ESG问题相关时,GCI的披露水平通常更高,这表明公司在符合其对股东的授权的情况下更愿意解决可持续性问题。相关性分析显示,GCI指数与摩根士丹利资本国际三个可持续发展评级中的两个适度或强烈相关,突出了公司对财务相关领域的关注,与公司的CDP气候变化评级弱相关,突出表明GCI在捕捉详细的以环境为重点的可持续发展努力方面的范围有限。我们还显示,随着时间的推移,摩根士丹利资本国际对道琼斯30指数的可持续性评级总体呈上升趋势,制造业、金融业和零售业的公司推动了评级的上升。我们的研究结果有助于填补美国公司报告全球基础设施的可持续性文献中的空白,并可能为联合国贸易和发展会议审查支持2030年议程的全球基础设施提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting publishes original research dealing with international aspects of financial management and reporting, banking and financial services, auditing and taxation. Providing a forum for the interaction of ideas from both academics and practitioners, the JIFMA keeps you up-to-date with new developments and emerging trends.
期刊最新文献
Cross‐border cooperation and tax avoidance of U.S. cross‐listed firms Issue Information How does asset redeployability affect stock price crash risk? Integrated reporting quality and negative ESG media coverage: Empirical evidence from South Africa Employee training and bank stability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1