New research alliances in the era of managed care

William Goldman, Roland Sturm, Joyce McCulloch
{"title":"New research alliances in the era of managed care","authors":"William Goldman,&nbsp;Roland Sturm,&nbsp;Joyce McCulloch","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1099-176X(199909)2:3<107::AID-MHP50>3.0.CO;2-P","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Background: The rise of managed behavioral health care in the United States was accompanied by reductions in costs, which has shifted the policy debate from concerns about rising costs to questions of universal access, mental health benefits at parity with medical benefits and quality of care. To meet these new challenges, managed care organizations, the purchasers of health care and academic services researchers must work together in new ways. Aims of the Study: This paper discusses collaborative efforts between a for-profit managed care firm, academia and purchasers of health care coverage to study parity for mental health and substance abuse and how this effort has become part of a research strategy to inform policy. Historical, strategic and methodological issues are presented. Methods: Case Study. Results: Although the benefits from cooperative research are substantial, there are severe hurdles. Managed care organizations often have data that could answer pressing policy questions, yet these data are rarely used by researchers because it is difficult to obtain access and because analyzing the data requires computing facilities and skills that are not common in health services research. In turn, managed care organizations can learn how to design and implement more informative data systems that eventually lead to more cost-effective care, but there often are more immediately pressing business considerations and sometimes resistance to outside scrutiny. Important features that made this cooperation successful include strong support from the senior management in the company, including complete access to their extensive databases, and established funding for a managed care research center by the National Institute of Mental Health. Conclusion: This paper illustrates the potential of collaborative research. New research challenges, such as the linkages between quality and cost-effectiveness in actual practice settings, can only be met successfully if we build alliances among payors, managed care companies and academic researchers. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":46381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","volume":"2 3","pages":"107-110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1099-176X(199909)2:3<107::AID-MHP50>3.0.CO;2-P","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-176X%28199909%292%3A3%3C107%3A%3AAID-MHP50%3E3.0.CO%3B2-P","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: The rise of managed behavioral health care in the United States was accompanied by reductions in costs, which has shifted the policy debate from concerns about rising costs to questions of universal access, mental health benefits at parity with medical benefits and quality of care. To meet these new challenges, managed care organizations, the purchasers of health care and academic services researchers must work together in new ways. Aims of the Study: This paper discusses collaborative efforts between a for-profit managed care firm, academia and purchasers of health care coverage to study parity for mental health and substance abuse and how this effort has become part of a research strategy to inform policy. Historical, strategic and methodological issues are presented. Methods: Case Study. Results: Although the benefits from cooperative research are substantial, there are severe hurdles. Managed care organizations often have data that could answer pressing policy questions, yet these data are rarely used by researchers because it is difficult to obtain access and because analyzing the data requires computing facilities and skills that are not common in health services research. In turn, managed care organizations can learn how to design and implement more informative data systems that eventually lead to more cost-effective care, but there often are more immediately pressing business considerations and sometimes resistance to outside scrutiny. Important features that made this cooperation successful include strong support from the senior management in the company, including complete access to their extensive databases, and established funding for a managed care research center by the National Institute of Mental Health. Conclusion: This paper illustrates the potential of collaborative research. New research challenges, such as the linkages between quality and cost-effectiveness in actual practice settings, can only be met successfully if we build alliances among payors, managed care companies and academic researchers. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管理护理时代的新研究联盟
背景:美国管理行为医疗的兴起伴随着成本的降低,这将政策辩论从对成本上升的担忧转移到了普及、与医疗福利同等的心理健康福利和护理质量的问题上。为了应对这些新的挑战,管理型医疗机构、医疗保健购买者和学术服务研究人员必须以新的方式合作。研究目的:本文讨论了营利性管理医疗公司、学术界和医疗保险购买者之间的合作,以研究心理健康和药物滥用的平等性,以及这一努力如何成为政策研究战略的一部分。介绍了历史、战略和方法问题。方法:个案研究。结果:尽管合作研究的收益是巨大的,但也存在严重的障碍。管理型护理组织通常拥有可以回答紧迫政策问题的数据,但研究人员很少使用这些数据,因为很难获得访问权限,而且分析数据需要计算设施和技能,而这些在医疗服务研究中并不常见。反过来,托管护理组织可以学习如何设计和实施信息量更大的数据系统,最终实现更具成本效益的护理,但通常会有更紧迫的业务考虑因素,有时还会抵制外部审查。使此次合作成功的重要特征包括公司高级管理层的大力支持,包括完全访问他们广泛的数据库,以及国家心理健康研究所为一个管理护理研究中心设立的资金。结论:本文展示了合作研究的潜力。只有在付款人、管理型护理公司和学术研究人员之间建立联盟,才能成功应对新的研究挑战,例如实际实践环境中质量和成本效益之间的联系。版权所有©1999 John Wiley&;有限公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics publishes high quality empirical, analytical and methodologic papers focusing on the application of health and economic research and policy analysis in mental health. It offers an international forum to enable the different participants in mental health policy and economics - psychiatrists involved in research and care and other mental health workers, health services researchers, health economists, policy makers, public and private health providers, advocacy groups, and the pharmaceutical industry - to share common information in a common language.
期刊最新文献
Cost-Effectiveness of Digital Preventive Parent Training for Early Childhood Disruptive Behaviour. Mental Health Expenditure in Canada. Relationship of Cryptocurrency Trading to Quality of Life, Sleep and Stress Levels in Academics Maternal Depression and Physical Health of Under-Five Children in Turkey. PERSPECTIVE: A Fireside Chat about Global Mental Health with Dr. Esther Duflo, Nobel Laureate in Economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1