Conventional Practitioners' Communication of Integrative Alternatives for Chronic Back Pain: An Evidence-based, Patient-centered Model.

Q3 Medicine Integrative medicine Pub Date : 2014-04-01
Ruthann Russo
{"title":"Conventional Practitioners' Communication of Integrative Alternatives for Chronic Back Pain: An Evidence-based, Patient-centered Model.","authors":"Ruthann Russo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic back pain is one of the most common conditions treated in the United States. Informed consent is the communication of treatment alternatives, benefits, and risks and must be provided to patients in most instances. The alternatives provided during this discussion should include all options supported by research evidence and the patient's preferences. This article proposes a model for chronic back pain that includes the communication of complementary therapies as part of a patient-centered, integrative approach to informed consent. The content of informed consent is determined by common law (court cases), legislation, regulations, and evidence-based research. The practitioner's and patient's knowledge and the patient's values should be used to filter this information. Finally, shared decision making should be used to arrive at the patient's final decision regarding informed consent for treatment. </p>","PeriodicalId":13593,"journal":{"name":"Integrative medicine","volume":"13 2","pages":"35-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684128/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic back pain is one of the most common conditions treated in the United States. Informed consent is the communication of treatment alternatives, benefits, and risks and must be provided to patients in most instances. The alternatives provided during this discussion should include all options supported by research evidence and the patient's preferences. This article proposes a model for chronic back pain that includes the communication of complementary therapies as part of a patient-centered, integrative approach to informed consent. The content of informed consent is determined by common law (court cases), legislation, regulations, and evidence-based research. The practitioner's and patient's knowledge and the patient's values should be used to filter this information. Finally, shared decision making should be used to arrive at the patient's final decision regarding informed consent for treatment.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统从业者对慢性背痛综合替代方案的沟通:一个基于证据、以患者为中心的模型。
慢性背痛是在美国治疗的最常见的疾病之一。知情同意是对治疗方案、益处和风险的沟通,在大多数情况下必须向患者提供。本次讨论中提供的备选方案应包括有研究证据和患者偏好支持的所有选项。本文提出了一种慢性背痛的模型,其中包括作为以患者为中心的知情同意综合方法的一部分的补充疗法的交流。知情同意的内容由普通法(法院案例)、立法、法规和循证研究决定。应使用从业者和患者的知识以及患者的价值观来过滤这些信息。最后,应使用共同决策来达成患者关于知情同意治疗的最终决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Integrative medicine
Integrative medicine Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Impact of Short-Term Integrated Yoga Therapy Intervention on Systemic Inflammatory Markers and Quality of Life in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Naturopathic Management to Taper Off Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes: A Case Report. Revealing the in-office study findings of Daiwa Brain Health vs. Prevagen. The Road to Cancer Recovery for Melanie Cole and Caitlin Whyte. Thoughts on Establishing a New Standard for Assessing Toxic Load in the General Population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1