A comparative study of experiments and theories on steady-state evaporation of water

Michael T. Rauter , Ailo Aasen , Signe Kjelstrup , Øivind Wilhelmsen
{"title":"A comparative study of experiments and theories on steady-state evaporation of water","authors":"Michael T. Rauter ,&nbsp;Ailo Aasen ,&nbsp;Signe Kjelstrup ,&nbsp;Øivind Wilhelmsen","doi":"10.1016/j.ctta.2022.100091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A precise description of energy and mass transport across the liquid-vapor interface of water is central in disciplines spanning from climatology to seawater desalination. We present a critical assessment of six recent experimental data sets that report temperature jumps, vapor pressures, and evaporation rates during steady-state evaporation of water. The experimental data were used to test available theories. Three state-of-the-art theories that take the resistance of the liquid-vapor interface into account were compared; statistical rate theory, non-equilibrium thermodynamics, and kinetic theory of gases. Statistical rate theory appears to under-predict the difference between the saturation pressure and the actual pressure of the vapor phase. Interface transfer coefficients for water compatible with non-equilibrium thermodynamics theory were determined. These coefficients predict the right order of magnitude of the evaporation fluxes from the different data sets. However, inconsistencies between the different data sets and indications of systematic measurement errors were identified during the determination and evaluation of these coefficients. The condensation coefficient in kinetic theory of gases computed from the experimental data span two orders of magnitude. All three theories were found to depend much on a precise determination of the conditions at the interface, in particular on the difference between the vapor phase pressure and the saturation pressure. Already a shift of 1–5 Pa changes the predicted evaporation rates significantly. For certain experiments, a change of 2 Pa modifies the evaporation rate predicted by statistical rate theory by one order of magnitude. Overall, we show that determination of vapor pressures to a higher accuracy (<span><math><mo>&lt;</mo></math></span>0.3 Pa) is needed to enhance the understanding of evaporation mechanisms and which theory to use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9781,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Thermodynamics and Thermal Analysis","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100091"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667312622000578/pdfft?md5=31f7b66192555b471b8ef503075c0c38&pid=1-s2.0-S2667312622000578-main.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Thermodynamics and Thermal Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667312622000578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

A precise description of energy and mass transport across the liquid-vapor interface of water is central in disciplines spanning from climatology to seawater desalination. We present a critical assessment of six recent experimental data sets that report temperature jumps, vapor pressures, and evaporation rates during steady-state evaporation of water. The experimental data were used to test available theories. Three state-of-the-art theories that take the resistance of the liquid-vapor interface into account were compared; statistical rate theory, non-equilibrium thermodynamics, and kinetic theory of gases. Statistical rate theory appears to under-predict the difference between the saturation pressure and the actual pressure of the vapor phase. Interface transfer coefficients for water compatible with non-equilibrium thermodynamics theory were determined. These coefficients predict the right order of magnitude of the evaporation fluxes from the different data sets. However, inconsistencies between the different data sets and indications of systematic measurement errors were identified during the determination and evaluation of these coefficients. The condensation coefficient in kinetic theory of gases computed from the experimental data span two orders of magnitude. All three theories were found to depend much on a precise determination of the conditions at the interface, in particular on the difference between the vapor phase pressure and the saturation pressure. Already a shift of 1–5 Pa changes the predicted evaporation rates significantly. For certain experiments, a change of 2 Pa modifies the evaporation rate predicted by statistical rate theory by one order of magnitude. Overall, we show that determination of vapor pressures to a higher accuracy (<0.3 Pa) is needed to enhance the understanding of evaporation mechanisms and which theory to use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水稳态蒸发实验与理论的比较研究
从气候学到海水淡化,精确描述水的液-汽界面上的能量和质量传输是学科的核心。我们对最近的六个实验数据集进行了关键评估,这些数据集报告了水稳态蒸发过程中的温度跳跃、蒸汽压和蒸发率。实验数据被用来检验现有的理论。比较了考虑液-汽界面阻力的三种最先进的理论;统计速率理论、非平衡热力学和气体动力学理论。统计速率理论似乎低估了饱和压力和气相实际压力之间的差异。根据非平衡热力学理论,确定了水的界面传递系数。这些系数预测了来自不同数据集的蒸发通量的正确数量级。然而,在确定和评估这些系数的过程中,发现了不同数据集和系统测量误差指示之间的不一致。根据实验数据计算的气体动力学理论中的冷凝系数跨越两个数量级。发现这三种理论都在很大程度上取决于界面条件的精确确定,特别是气相压力和饱和压力之间的差异。已经是1-5班了 Pa显著改变了预测的蒸发速率。对于某些实验,2的变化 Pa将统计速率理论预测的蒸发速率修正了一个数量级。总体而言,我们表明蒸汽压力的测定具有更高的精度(<;0.3 Pa)来增强对蒸发机制和使用哪种理论的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ultrasonic study of polyethylene glycol and ethanol interactions: impact of concentration and temperature Thermal decomposition of zinc hexacyanometalates in various gas media Macleod equation and constant in pure, binary and ternary systems CO2-philicity of crude oil constituents: A computational study Viscosity modelling of chlorinated brines in three-component systems with a continuously variable temperature range between 293-323 K
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1