Abordaje laparoscópico para el tratamiento quirúrgico de los tumores renales y del tracto urinario superior

J.A. Rivera-Ramírez, J.J. Cendejas-Gómez, B. Gabilondo-Pliego, F. Rodríguez-Covarrubias
{"title":"Abordaje laparoscópico para el tratamiento quirúrgico de los tumores renales y del tracto urinario superior","authors":"J.A. Rivera-Ramírez,&nbsp;J.J. Cendejas-Gómez,&nbsp;B. Gabilondo-Pliego,&nbsp;F. Rodríguez-Covarrubias","doi":"10.1016/j.uromx.2016.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Laparoscopy is currently one of the options for the surgical treatment of kidney tumors and upper urinary tract tumors with oncologic results that are similar to those of open surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To describe the experience in the laparoscopic treatment of kidney and upper urinary tract tumors at our hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A retrospective and descriptive study was conducted, analyzing the database of patients with kidney or upper urinary tract tumors treated through the laparoscopic procedures of nephrectomy (radical or partial) or nephroureterectomy within the time frame of August 2006 and June 2015. Radiologic and histopathologic variables were analyzed, along with the frequency of complications (Clavien-Dindo classification).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Ninety-six patients were identified that underwent the laparoscopic approach. Fifty-eight radical nephrectomies, 24 partial nephrectomies, and 14 nephroureterectomies were performed. The conversion rate was 16.6% and the mean hospital stay was 5 days. Grade IIIa and IVa complications presented in 9.3% of the cases. The mean follow-up period was 31.2 months and only one patient has died, due to leukemia.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We consider the laparoscopic approach to be a good treatment option for kidney tumors and upper urinary tract tumors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34909,"journal":{"name":"Revista mexicana de urologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.uromx.2016.06.002","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista mexicana de urologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S200740851630026X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction

Laparoscopy is currently one of the options for the surgical treatment of kidney tumors and upper urinary tract tumors with oncologic results that are similar to those of open surgery.

Aim

To describe the experience in the laparoscopic treatment of kidney and upper urinary tract tumors at our hospital.

Materials and methods

A retrospective and descriptive study was conducted, analyzing the database of patients with kidney or upper urinary tract tumors treated through the laparoscopic procedures of nephrectomy (radical or partial) or nephroureterectomy within the time frame of August 2006 and June 2015. Radiologic and histopathologic variables were analyzed, along with the frequency of complications (Clavien-Dindo classification).

Results

Ninety-six patients were identified that underwent the laparoscopic approach. Fifty-eight radical nephrectomies, 24 partial nephrectomies, and 14 nephroureterectomies were performed. The conversion rate was 16.6% and the mean hospital stay was 5 days. Grade IIIa and IVa complications presented in 9.3% of the cases. The mean follow-up period was 31.2 months and only one patient has died, due to leukemia.

Conclusions

We consider the laparoscopic approach to be a good treatment option for kidney tumors and upper urinary tract tumors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜手术治疗肾和上尿路肿瘤
引言腹腔镜是目前肾脏肿瘤和上尿路肿瘤的手术治疗选择之一,其肿瘤学结果与开放手术相似。目的介绍我院腹腔镜治疗肾及上尿路肿瘤的经验。材料和方法进行了一项回顾性和描述性研究,分析了2006年8月至2015年6月期间通过腹腔镜肾切除术(根治性或部分)或肾输尿管切除术治疗的肾或上尿路肿瘤患者的数据库。分析放射学和组织病理学变量,以及并发症的发生频率(Clavien-Dindo分类)。结果96例患者采用腹腔镜入路。共进行了58例根治性肾切除术、24例部分肾切除术和14例肾输尿管切除术。转化率为16.6%,平均住院时间为5天。9.3%的病例出现IIIa和IVa级并发症。平均随访期为31.2个月,只有一名患者死于白血病。结论腹腔镜入路是治疗肾肿瘤和上尿路肿瘤的良好方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista mexicana de urologia
Revista mexicana de urologia Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Revista Mexicana de Urología (RMU) [Mexican Journal of Urology] (ISSN: 0185-4542 / ISSN electronic: 2007-4085) is bimonthly publication that disseminates research by academicians and professionals of the international medical community interested in urological subjects, in the format of original articles, clinical cases, review articles brief communications and letters to the editor. Owing to its nature, it is publication with international scope that disseminates contributions in Spanish and English that are rigorously reviewed by peers under the double blind modality. Neither journalistic documents nor those that lack rigorous medical or scientific support are suitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Fe de errores de «Resultados obtenidos con nefrolitotomía percutánea y su correlación con las escalas de Guy y S.T.O.N.E. en un hospital de la Ciudad de México» [Rev Mex Urol. 2016;76:331] Blindness due to a systemic fungal infection in a patient with a ureteral catheter Permixon® en el tratamiento de los síntomas del tracto urinario inferior por hiperplasia benigna de próstata: Nuevas aportaciones Resultados de la nefrectomía laparoscópica en pacientes obesos y no obesos Alfa-1 bloqueantes y resultados urodinámicos en varones con síntomas del tracto urinario inferior relacionados con obstrucción benigna de próstata: ¿fin de la controversia?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1