Blood pressure measurement in anaesthetised sows: comparison between invasive and oscillometric methods during short term laparoscopic surgery

J.I. Cruz, N.A. Caulkett, C. Riley, A. Cruz
{"title":"Blood pressure measurement in anaesthetised sows: comparison between invasive and oscillometric methods during short term laparoscopic surgery","authors":"J.I. Cruz,&nbsp;N.A. Caulkett,&nbsp;C. Riley,&nbsp;A. Cruz","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-2995.1998.tb00167.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A study comparing invasive versus oscillometric techniques for the measurement of arterial blood pressure was carried out in 4 anaesthetised sows undergoing laparoscopy. Regression analysis was used to determine the correlation coefficient.</p><p>Bias was 19.2 for systolic, 20.6 for mean and 18.8 for diastolic. Both bias and precision showed a consistent underestimation of blood pressure values recorded by oscillometry.</p><p>These results do not support the use of the oscillometric method when accurate figures for blood pressure are required in sows.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100854,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1467-2995.1998.tb00167.x","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1351657416300213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

A study comparing invasive versus oscillometric techniques for the measurement of arterial blood pressure was carried out in 4 anaesthetised sows undergoing laparoscopy. Regression analysis was used to determine the correlation coefficient.

Bias was 19.2 for systolic, 20.6 for mean and 18.8 for diastolic. Both bias and precision showed a consistent underestimation of blood pressure values recorded by oscillometry.

These results do not support the use of the oscillometric method when accurate figures for blood pressure are required in sows.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麻醉母猪的血压测量:短期腹腔镜手术中有创法和示波法的比较
在4头接受腹腔镜检查的麻醉母猪身上进行了一项比较有创和示波技术测量动脉血压的研究。回归分析用于确定相关系数。收缩压的偏倚为19.2,平均值为20.6,舒张压为18.8。偏差和精确度都显示出对示波法记录的血压值的一贯低估。当需要准确的母猪血压数据时,这些结果不支持使用示波法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ERRATUM Cardiopulmonary effects of a two hour medetomidine infusion and its antagonism by atipamezole in horses and ponies Actions and pharmacokinetic properties of the α2-adrenergic agents, medetomidine and atipamezole, in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Sevoflurane anaesthesia in clinical equine cases: maintenance and recovery The effect of guaiphenesin on romifidine/ketamine anaesthesia in ponies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1