A deep placement of lime nitrogen reduces the nitrate leaching and promotes soybean growth and seed yield

Takuji Ohyama , Keisuke Ikebe , Sotaro Okuoka , Tomoya Ozawa , Takuya Nishiura , Taiga Ishiwata , Ayane Yamazaki , Fumu Tanaka , Toru Takahashi , Takumi Umezawa , Hiroyuki Ohshima , Taku Kato , Yoshiyuki Maeda , Akihiro Saito , Kyoko Higuchi , Norikuni Ohtake , Yoshihiko Takahashi , Naoki Harada , Naoko Ohkama-Ohtsu
{"title":"A deep placement of lime nitrogen reduces the nitrate leaching and promotes soybean growth and seed yield","authors":"Takuji Ohyama ,&nbsp;Keisuke Ikebe ,&nbsp;Sotaro Okuoka ,&nbsp;Tomoya Ozawa ,&nbsp;Takuya Nishiura ,&nbsp;Taiga Ishiwata ,&nbsp;Ayane Yamazaki ,&nbsp;Fumu Tanaka ,&nbsp;Toru Takahashi ,&nbsp;Takumi Umezawa ,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Ohshima ,&nbsp;Taku Kato ,&nbsp;Yoshiyuki Maeda ,&nbsp;Akihiro Saito ,&nbsp;Kyoko Higuchi ,&nbsp;Norikuni Ohtake ,&nbsp;Yoshihiko Takahashi ,&nbsp;Naoki Harada ,&nbsp;Naoko Ohkama-Ohtsu","doi":"10.1016/j.crope.2022.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Deep placement of coated urea, lime nitrogen (Lime N), or urea with a nitrification inhibitor, 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP-U) did not inhibit N fixation activity, and it promoted soybean growth and seed yield. However, the effect of deep placement on the N budget including N leaching has not been evaluated. In this research, soybean plants were cultivated with a basal deep placement of urea, Lime N, or DMPP-U, and the control without deep placement of N fertilizer in lysimeters filled with Andosols. The nitrate was the principal N leachate and most of them leached until the flowering stage. The total amount of leached nitrate was the highest in urea deep placement, and it was reduced by the deep placement of Lime N or DMPP-U. In 2020, the total amount of nitrate in the leachate during the cultivation was 0.95, 1.83, and 2.78 ​g ​N m<sup>−2</sup> in control, Lime N, and urea, respectively. The seed yield was higher in Lime N (424 ​g ​m<sup>−2</sup>) and urea (399 ​g ​m<sup>−2</sup>) than in the control (267 ​g ​m<sup>−2</sup>). The total amount of N accumulated in the shoots was higher in Lime N (32.1 ​g ​N m<sup>−2</sup>) than in the control (26.5 ​g ​N m<sup>−2</sup>) and urea (24.2 ​g ​N m<sup>−2</sup>) treatments. These results indicated that soybean plants with Lime N might assimilate more N both from N fertilizer and N<sub>2</sub> fixation compared with control plants. Soil incubation test confirmed that the Lime N or DMPP-U retarded nitrification than urea.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100340,"journal":{"name":"Crop and Environment","volume":"1 4","pages":"Pages 221-230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773126X22000399/pdfft?md5=4227ab924856b7d077afefa7318e63e8&pid=1-s2.0-S2773126X22000399-main.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773126X22000399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Deep placement of coated urea, lime nitrogen (Lime N), or urea with a nitrification inhibitor, 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP-U) did not inhibit N fixation activity, and it promoted soybean growth and seed yield. However, the effect of deep placement on the N budget including N leaching has not been evaluated. In this research, soybean plants were cultivated with a basal deep placement of urea, Lime N, or DMPP-U, and the control without deep placement of N fertilizer in lysimeters filled with Andosols. The nitrate was the principal N leachate and most of them leached until the flowering stage. The total amount of leached nitrate was the highest in urea deep placement, and it was reduced by the deep placement of Lime N or DMPP-U. In 2020, the total amount of nitrate in the leachate during the cultivation was 0.95, 1.83, and 2.78 ​g ​N m−2 in control, Lime N, and urea, respectively. The seed yield was higher in Lime N (424 ​g ​m−2) and urea (399 ​g ​m−2) than in the control (267 ​g ​m−2). The total amount of N accumulated in the shoots was higher in Lime N (32.1 ​g ​N m−2) than in the control (26.5 ​g ​N m−2) and urea (24.2 ​g ​N m−2) treatments. These results indicated that soybean plants with Lime N might assimilate more N both from N fertilizer and N2 fixation compared with control plants. Soil incubation test confirmed that the Lime N or DMPP-U retarded nitrification than urea.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深层施用石灰氮可减少硝酸盐的浸出,促进大豆生长和种子产量
深层施用包膜尿素、石灰氮(lime N)或含有硝化抑制剂3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸盐(DMPP-U)的尿素不会抑制固氮活性,反而促进了大豆的生长和种子产量。然而,深埋对包括氮浸出在内的氮预算的影响尚未得到评估。在这项研究中,大豆植株采用尿素、石灰氮或DMPP-U的基础深埋栽培,而对照则不在装有Andosols的蒸渗池中深埋氮肥。硝酸盐是主要的渗滤液,大部分渗滤液一直渗到开花期。尿素深层放置的硝酸盐浸出总量最高,石灰N或DMPP-U的深层放置降低了浸出总量。2020年,培养过程中渗滤液中的硝酸盐总量分别为0.95、1.83和2.78​g​对照中的N m−2、石灰N和尿素。石灰N(424​g​m−2)和尿素(399​g​m−2)比对照组(267​g​m−2)。青柠氮在芽中积累的总氮量较高(32.1​g​N m−2)比对照组(26.5​g​N m−2)和尿素(24.2​g​N m−2)处理。这些结果表明,与对照植物相比,施用石灰氮的大豆植物可能从氮肥和固氮中吸收更多的氮。土壤培养试验证实石灰N或DMPP-U比尿素延缓硝化作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Genotypic adaptation to soil water deficit in rice - a comparison of desirable traits for aerobic production and lowland drought resistance Increasing seedling number alleviates the adverse effects of warming on grain yield and reduces greenhouse gas emission in late-season rice Foliar uniconazole application increases rice lodging resistance by altering stem morphological and anatomical traits Publisher's Note Light condition during grain-filling stage of main crop strongly influences ratooning ability of low-stubble ratoon rice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1