Connecting the dots: uncovering the relationships between challenges confronting Africa's organ transplant supply chain systems

Temidayo O. Akenroye, A. Oyedijo, Vishnu C. Rajan, G. Zsidisin, M. Mkansi, J. Baz
{"title":"Connecting the dots: uncovering the relationships between challenges confronting Africa's organ transplant supply chain systems","authors":"Temidayo O. Akenroye, A. Oyedijo, Vishnu C. Rajan, G. Zsidisin, M. Mkansi, J. Baz","doi":"10.1108/scm-12-2022-0457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to develop a hierarchical model that uncovers the relationships between challenges confronting Africa's organ transplant supply chain systems.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nEleven challenges (variables) were identified after a comprehensive review of the existing literature. The contextual interactions among these variables were analysed from the perspectives of health-care stakeholders in two sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries (Nigeria and Uganda), using Delphi-interpretive structural modelling-cross-impact matrix multiplication applied to classification (MICMAC) techniques.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings reveal that weak regulatory frameworks, insufficient information systems and a lack of necessary skills make it challenging for critical actors to perform the tasks effectively. The interaction effects of these challenges weaken organ supply chains and make it less efficient, giving rise to negative externalities such as black markets for donated organs and organ tourism/trafficking.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis paper establishes a solid foundation for a critical topic that could significantly impact human health and life once the government or non-profit ecosystem matures. The MICMAC analysis in this paper provides a methodological approach for future studies wishing to further develop the organ supply chain structural models.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe study provides valuable insights for experts and policymakers on where to prioritise efforts in designing interventions to strengthen organ transplantation supply chains in developing countries.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study is one of the first to empirically examine the challenges of organ transplant supply chains from an SSA perspective, including theoretically grounded explanations from data collected in two developing countries.\n","PeriodicalId":43857,"journal":{"name":"Operations and Supply Chain Management-An International Journal","volume":"47 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations and Supply Chain Management-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-12-2022-0457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to develop a hierarchical model that uncovers the relationships between challenges confronting Africa's organ transplant supply chain systems. Design/methodology/approach Eleven challenges (variables) were identified after a comprehensive review of the existing literature. The contextual interactions among these variables were analysed from the perspectives of health-care stakeholders in two sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries (Nigeria and Uganda), using Delphi-interpretive structural modelling-cross-impact matrix multiplication applied to classification (MICMAC) techniques. Findings The findings reveal that weak regulatory frameworks, insufficient information systems and a lack of necessary skills make it challenging for critical actors to perform the tasks effectively. The interaction effects of these challenges weaken organ supply chains and make it less efficient, giving rise to negative externalities such as black markets for donated organs and organ tourism/trafficking. Research limitations/implications This paper establishes a solid foundation for a critical topic that could significantly impact human health and life once the government or non-profit ecosystem matures. The MICMAC analysis in this paper provides a methodological approach for future studies wishing to further develop the organ supply chain structural models. Practical implications The study provides valuable insights for experts and policymakers on where to prioritise efforts in designing interventions to strengthen organ transplantation supply chains in developing countries. Originality/value This study is one of the first to empirically examine the challenges of organ transplant supply chains from an SSA perspective, including theoretically grounded explanations from data collected in two developing countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
串连点:揭示非洲器官移植供应链系统面临的挑战之间的关系
本研究旨在建立一个层次模型,揭示非洲器官移植供应链系统面临的挑战之间的关系。设计/方法/方法在对现有文献进行全面审查后,确定了甚至挑战(变量)。从两个撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)国家(尼日利亚和乌干达)的卫生保健利益攸关方的角度,使用德尔菲-解释结构建模-交叉影响矩阵乘法应用于分类(MICMAC)技术,分析了这些变量之间的背景相互作用。调查结果显示,监管框架薄弱、信息系统不足以及缺乏必要的技能,使得关键行为者难以有效地执行任务。这些挑战的相互作用削弱了器官供应链,使其效率降低,产生了负面的外部性,如捐赠器官黑市和器官旅游/贩运。研究局限/启示本文为一个关键主题奠定了坚实的基础,一旦政府或非营利生态系统成熟,该主题可能会对人类健康和生活产生重大影响。本文的MICMAC分析为希望进一步发展器官供应链结构模型的未来研究提供了一种方法学方法。实际意义该研究为专家和政策制定者提供了宝贵的见解,说明在设计干预措施以加强发展中国家器官移植供应链时应优先考虑哪些方面。原创性/价值本研究是第一个从SSA的角度对器官移植供应链的挑战进行实证研究的研究之一,包括从两个发展中国家收集的数据进行理论基础解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
27.80%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
A Study of Different Croston-Like Forecasting Methods Evolution of Performance Measurement Research: An Update on Research Development from 2005 to 2020 and Future Outlook for the Field Can the supply chain management field be more critical? Building new bridges with critical management studies On the Effectiveness of Option Contracts under Supply Disruption From Wireframe to Dashboard – Creating Transparency in Supply Chain Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1