KRYTERIA DEFINICYJNE RAŻĄCEGO NIEDBALSTWA

Q3 Social Sciences Studia Iuridica Lublinensia Pub Date : 2023-06-14 DOI:10.31338/2544-3135.si.2022-95.12
Daniel Jakubowski
{"title":"KRYTERIA DEFINICYJNE RAŻĄCEGO NIEDBALSTWA","authors":"Daniel Jakubowski","doi":"10.31338/2544-3135.si.2022-95.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the results of a study on the judgments in which the courts ruled on the issue of gross negligence. The main goal is to identify the criteria the courts adopt for defining gross negligence. Using qualitative analysis the author classifies the criteria into categories and points to the differences between them, while performing quantitative analysis indicates the frequency of particular criteria usage in practice and analyzes statistical relationship between the categories and the criteria. In addition to the conclusions concerning the concept of gross negligence, the author offers critical comments on the formulation of justifications for judgments.","PeriodicalId":36157,"journal":{"name":"Studia Iuridica Lublinensia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Iuridica Lublinensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31338/2544-3135.si.2022-95.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article discusses the results of a study on the judgments in which the courts ruled on the issue of gross negligence. The main goal is to identify the criteria the courts adopt for defining gross negligence. Using qualitative analysis the author classifies the criteria into categories and points to the differences between them, while performing quantitative analysis indicates the frequency of particular criteria usage in practice and analyzes statistical relationship between the categories and the criteria. In addition to the conclusions concerning the concept of gross negligence, the author offers critical comments on the formulation of justifications for judgments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文讨论了法院对重大过失问题判决的研究结果。主要目的是确定法院用来界定重大过失的标准。采用定性分析的方法,对标准进行分类,指出标准之间的差异;采用定量分析的方法,指出具体标准在实践中的使用频率,分析类别与标准之间的统计关系。除了关于重大过失概念的结论外,作者还对判决理由的表述提出了批评意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
The Legal Position of the National Bank of Poland as a Guardian of the Value of Money in the Light of Normative Determinants of Monetary Order The Transparency of Constitutional Reasoning: A Text Mining Analysis of the Hungarian Constitutional Court’s Jurisprudence Convergence of International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law in Armed Conflicts Land Valuation Methods in Land Consolidation Proceedings vs. Implementation of the Purpose of Land Consolidation as Specified in the Land Consolidation and Exchange Act of 1982 in Rural Poland The Medievalist Approach to the Idea of Peace Based on the Example of the Doctrine of Marsilius of Padua
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1