Crisis, What Crisis? Immigrants, Refugees, and Invisible Struggles

IF 0.9 Q3 DEMOGRAPHY Refuge Pub Date : 2018-06-18 DOI:10.7202/1050852AR
Anna Carastathis, A. Spathopoulou, Myrto Tsilimpounidi
{"title":"Crisis, What Crisis? Immigrants, Refugees, and Invisible Struggles","authors":"Anna Carastathis, A. Spathopoulou, Myrto Tsilimpounidi","doi":"10.7202/1050852AR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Different evocations of “crisis” create distinct categories that in turn evoke certain social reactions. After 2008 Greece became the epicentre of the “financial crisis”; since 2015 with the advent of the “refugee crisis,” it became the “hotspot of Europe.” What are the different vocabularies of crisis? Moreover, how have both representations of crisis facilitated humanitarian crises to become phenomena for European and transnational institutional management? What are the hegemonically constructed subjects of the different crises? The everyday reality in the crisis-ridden hotspot of Europe is invisible in these representations. It is precisely the daily, soft, lived, and unspoken realities of intersecting crises that hegemonic discourses of successive, overlapping, or “nesting crises” render invisible. By shifting the focus from who belongs to which state-devised category to an open-ended, polyvocal account of capitalist oppressions, we aim to question the state’s and supranational efforts to divide the “migrant mob” into discrete juridical categories of citi-zens (emigrants), refugees, and illegal immigrants, thereby undermining coalitional struggles between precaritised groups.","PeriodicalId":45974,"journal":{"name":"Refuge","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Refuge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1050852AR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Different evocations of “crisis” create distinct categories that in turn evoke certain social reactions. After 2008 Greece became the epicentre of the “financial crisis”; since 2015 with the advent of the “refugee crisis,” it became the “hotspot of Europe.” What are the different vocabularies of crisis? Moreover, how have both representations of crisis facilitated humanitarian crises to become phenomena for European and transnational institutional management? What are the hegemonically constructed subjects of the different crises? The everyday reality in the crisis-ridden hotspot of Europe is invisible in these representations. It is precisely the daily, soft, lived, and unspoken realities of intersecting crises that hegemonic discourses of successive, overlapping, or “nesting crises” render invisible. By shifting the focus from who belongs to which state-devised category to an open-ended, polyvocal account of capitalist oppressions, we aim to question the state’s and supranational efforts to divide the “migrant mob” into discrete juridical categories of citi-zens (emigrants), refugees, and illegal immigrants, thereby undermining coalitional struggles between precaritised groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危机,什么危机?移民、难民和无形的斗争
对“危机”的不同唤起创造了不同的类别,进而引发了特定的社会反应。2008年之后,希腊成为“金融危机”的中心;自2015年以来,随着“难民危机”的到来,它成为“欧洲的热点”。危机的不同词汇是什么?此外,危机的两种表现形式是如何促使人道主义危机成为欧洲和跨国机构管理的现象的?不同危机的霸权建构主体是什么?在这些表现中,危机缠身的欧洲热点地区的日常现实是看不见的。正是那些日常的、柔软的、活生生的、不可言说的、相互交织的危机的现实,使得那些连续的、重叠的或“嵌套的危机”的霸权话语变得不可见。通过将焦点从谁属于哪个国家设计的类别转移到对资本主义压迫的开放式、多声音描述,我们的目标是质疑国家和超国家的努力,将“移民暴徒”划分为公民(移民)、难民和非法移民等离散的法律类别,从而破坏不稳定群体之间的联盟斗争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Refuge
Refuge DEMOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
(Mis)trusted Contact: Resettlement Knowledge Assets and the Third Space of Refugee Reception Introduction: Special Issue on Private Sponsorship in Canada A Reflexive View of Refugee Integration and Inclusion: A Case Study of the Mennonite Central Committee and the Private Sponsorship of Refugees Program How Do Sponsors Think about "Month 13"? Forging African Communities: Mobility, Integration, and Belonging by Oliver Bakewell and Loren B. Landau (Eds.)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1