Neighborhood Social Ties and Informal Social Control: When do Neighbors Call the Police or Directly Intervene?

Jaclyn Cwick
{"title":"Neighborhood Social Ties and Informal Social Control: When do Neighbors Call the Police or Directly Intervene?","authors":"Jaclyn Cwick","doi":"10.54555/ccjls.4577.37324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social disorganization theory posits that neighborhood social ties facilitate residents’ engagement in distinct forms of informal social control important for crime reduction, including private, parochial, and public controls (Bursik & Grasmik, 1993). Yet research examining how social ties contribute to various forms of informal social control is rare, despite a recent resurgence in efforts to clarify these measures (see Warner, 2014). The present study examines whether neighborhood social ties influence direct informal social control (i.e., residents’ perceptions that their neighbors will stop a crime themselves or will get another neighbor to help) and indirect informal social control (i.e., residents’ perceptions that their neighbors will call the police) within ordinary least squares regression. Findings indicate that previous studies, which have relied on global measures of informal social control, have concealed more nuanced relationships regarding social ties and forms of informal social control. More specifically, neighborhood social ties were positively related to direct informal social control at low levels of disadvantage, but were negatively related to direct informal social control in neighborhoods with high concentrated disadvantage, while social ties were positively related to indirect informal social control regardless of disadvantaged context. Findings point to the importance of including more specific measures of informal social control in current and future residential surveys.","PeriodicalId":36774,"journal":{"name":"Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law and Society","volume":"163 S342","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54555/ccjls.4577.37324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social disorganization theory posits that neighborhood social ties facilitate residents’ engagement in distinct forms of informal social control important for crime reduction, including private, parochial, and public controls (Bursik & Grasmik, 1993). Yet research examining how social ties contribute to various forms of informal social control is rare, despite a recent resurgence in efforts to clarify these measures (see Warner, 2014). The present study examines whether neighborhood social ties influence direct informal social control (i.e., residents’ perceptions that their neighbors will stop a crime themselves or will get another neighbor to help) and indirect informal social control (i.e., residents’ perceptions that their neighbors will call the police) within ordinary least squares regression. Findings indicate that previous studies, which have relied on global measures of informal social control, have concealed more nuanced relationships regarding social ties and forms of informal social control. More specifically, neighborhood social ties were positively related to direct informal social control at low levels of disadvantage, but were negatively related to direct informal social control in neighborhoods with high concentrated disadvantage, while social ties were positively related to indirect informal social control regardless of disadvantaged context. Findings point to the importance of including more specific measures of informal social control in current and future residential surveys.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
邻里社会关系与非正式社会控制:邻里何时报警或直接干预?
社会解体理论认为,社区社会关系促进居民参与不同形式的非正式社会控制,包括私人、教区和公共控制,这对减少犯罪很重要(Bursik & Grasmik, 1993)。然而,研究社会关系如何促进各种形式的非正式社会控制的研究很少,尽管最近在澄清这些措施的努力中重新兴起(见Warner, 2014)。本研究在普通最小二乘回归中考察了社区社会关系是否影响直接非正式社会控制(即居民认为他们的邻居会自己阻止犯罪或会得到另一个邻居的帮助)和间接非正式社会控制(即居民认为他们的邻居会报警)。研究结果表明,之前的研究依赖于非正式社会控制的全球测量,掩盖了关于社会联系和非正式社会控制形式的更微妙的关系。在弱势群体中,社区社会关系与直接非正式社会控制呈正相关,而在弱势群体中,社区社会关系与直接非正式社会控制呈负相关,而在弱势群体中,社区社会关系与间接非正式社会控制呈正相关。研究结果指出,在当前和未来的住宅调查中,包括更具体的非正式社会控制措施的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law and Society
Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law and Society Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Outsider with Insider Privileges: Notes on Going Home Law Enforcement Murdered in the Line of Duty: A County-Level Analysis of Contributing Factors Content Analysis of Judges' Sentiments Toward Artificial Intelligence Risk Assessment Tools Perceived Parental Competence, Moral Neutralization, and Cognitive Impulsivity in Relation to Future Delinquency: Understanding the Socialization Process The Grass is Always Greener: Analyzing Crime Concentration and Specialization in Urban Greenspace Environs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1