Purchasing power parities v. exchange rates in international comparisons

M. Ward
{"title":"Purchasing power parities v. exchange rates in international comparisons","authors":"M. Ward","doi":"10.3233/SJU-2002-19403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The scope and use of purchasing power parities (PPPs) to analyse real economic conditions in an international perspective is examined. The respective applicability of PPPs and exchange rates to different questions of comparative economic progress is described. The paper identifies where PPP adjusted nominal values are to be preferred over exchange rates as indicators for determining differences in levels of development and general human welfare. The choices are reviewed in a number of different policy situations. The arguments suggest that PPPs provide a reliable basis for strengthening economic policies to promote wide-scale international development and human progress. For international portfolio and financial transactions, asset and liability transfers (including debt settlements), however, exchange rates remain the appropriate conversion factors. Thus, there are comparisons where PPPs should be applied but elsewhere, as in most financial transactions, only exchange rates matter. But, in a wide range of policy contexts, such as marginalization and polarization, the nature of the analytical relationships cannot be properly understood without looking at PPPs and exchange rates together. This enables users to gain a fuller appreciation of the economic issues and to mine the potential richness of the data available.","PeriodicalId":85585,"journal":{"name":"Statistical journal of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe","volume":"98 3","pages":"261-276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/SJU-2002-19403","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical journal of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SJU-2002-19403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The scope and use of purchasing power parities (PPPs) to analyse real economic conditions in an international perspective is examined. The respective applicability of PPPs and exchange rates to different questions of comparative economic progress is described. The paper identifies where PPP adjusted nominal values are to be preferred over exchange rates as indicators for determining differences in levels of development and general human welfare. The choices are reviewed in a number of different policy situations. The arguments suggest that PPPs provide a reliable basis for strengthening economic policies to promote wide-scale international development and human progress. For international portfolio and financial transactions, asset and liability transfers (including debt settlements), however, exchange rates remain the appropriate conversion factors. Thus, there are comparisons where PPPs should be applied but elsewhere, as in most financial transactions, only exchange rates matter. But, in a wide range of policy contexts, such as marginalization and polarization, the nature of the analytical relationships cannot be properly understood without looking at PPPs and exchange rates together. This enables users to gain a fuller appreciation of the economic issues and to mine the potential richness of the data available.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际比较中的购买力平价与汇率
范围和使用的购买力平价(ppp),以分析实际经济状况在国际的角度进行了审查。描述了购买力平价和汇率对不同比较经济进步问题的各自适用性。本文确定了购买力平价调整后的名义价值在哪些方面优于汇率,作为确定发展水平和一般人类福利差异的指标。在许多不同的政策情况下审查这些选择。这些论点表明,ppp为加强经济政策以促进大范围的国际发展和人类进步提供了可靠的基础。但是,对于国际证券和金融交易、资产和负债转让(包括债务结算),汇率仍然是适当的换算因素。因此,在一些比较中,购买力平价应该适用,但在其他地方,如在大多数金融交易中,只有汇率重要。但是,在广泛的政策背景下,如边缘化和两极分化,如果不把购买力平价和汇率放在一起看,就无法正确理解分析关系的本质。这使用户能够更充分地了解经济问题,并挖掘现有数据的潜在丰富性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Statistical business registers in the CIS countries: evidence from the UNECE questionnaire surveys Measuring discrimination in a register-based statistical system Challenges in social statistics Data communication - Emerging international trends and practices of the Australian Bureau of Statistics Measuring social welfare and sustainability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1