Interview with Wu Ming 1: QAnon, Collective Creativity, and the (Ab)uses of Enchantment

IF 2.7 2区社会学 Q1 CULTURAL STUDIES Theory Culture & Society Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1177/02632764221144265

M. Haiven, A. T. Kingsmith, A. Komporozos-Athanasiou

引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this interview with Wu Ming 1, a member of the mysterious but well-known and widely-translated novel-writing Wu Ming Collective, we discuss his new book, La Q di Qomplotto (The Q in Qonspiracy: How Conspiracy Fantasies Defend the System). In the interview, Wu Ming 1 unravels the power of narrative and games in driving conspiracy fantasies and fuelling new forms of activism that have risen to confront a system that gives rise to them.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

访谈吴明1:QAnon, Collective Creativity, and (Ab)use of Enchantment

吴明是一个神秘但知名且被广泛翻译的小说创作团体“吴明团体”的成员，在这次采访中，我们讨论了他的新书《阴谋论中的Q:阴谋幻想如何捍卫体制》。在采访中，吴明揭示了叙事和游戏在推动阴谋幻想和推动新形式的行动主义方面的力量，这些行动主义已经兴起，以对抗产生它们的系统。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Theory Culture & Society Multiple-

CiteScore

4.20

自引率

5.90%

发文量

期刊介绍： Theory, Culture & Society is a highly ranked, high impact factor, rigorously peer reviewed journal that publishes original research and review articles in the social and cultural sciences. Launched in 1982 to cater for the resurgence of interest in culture within contemporary social science, Theory, Culture & Society provides a forum for articles which theorize the relationship between culture and society. Theory, Culture & Society is at the cutting edge of recent developments in social and cultural theory. The journal has helped to break down some of the disciplinary barriers between the humanities and the social sciences by opening up a wide range of new questions in cultural theory.

期刊最新文献

Latour and the Question of Politics: A Constitutional Reading The Land of the Moderns: The Sense of Latour’s Pragmatism With and after the Inquiry: How Do We Pragmatically Move from the Moderns to the Contemporaries? Bruno Latour and Religion: A Strange Parishioner Artificial Intelligence and the Production of Judicial Truth