Role of noncontrast magnetic resonance pulmonary imaging in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism

IF 0.2 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.4103/ecdt.ecdt_62_22
O. Mohammad, A. Okab, Enas Sweed, Salwa Mohammed Elsaid, M. Sadek
{"title":"Role of noncontrast magnetic resonance pulmonary imaging in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism","authors":"O. Mohammad, A. Okab, Enas Sweed, Salwa Mohammed Elsaid, M. Sadek","doi":"10.4103/ecdt.ecdt_62_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a serious condition and has a clinical dilemma in diagnosis. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is a gold standard in its diagnosis, but MRI has proven a good role in PE diagnosis. Aim The aim of this work was to evaluate the role of noncontrast magnetic resonance pulmonary angiography (MRPA) imaging in diagnosis of acute PE using CTPA as a gold standard. Patients and methods In total, 25 patients with PE confirmed by CTPA were included in this study. All patients underwent computed tomography angiography and noncontrast MRPA on the same day or within three consecutive days. The results were compared and statistically analyzed. Results The mean age of the study group was 46.4 ± 13.5 years. Females represent 60% (15/25) and males represent 40% (10/25). The per-vessel sensitivity of noncontrast MRPA reached to about 100% with specificity 100% at the level of the main trunk, right and left main pulmonary arteries down to segmental arteries. The sensitivity for right subsegmental branches was 25% and left subsegmental branches was 33.3%. Conclusion The noncontrast MRPA has a reasonable sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of PE, especially in major branches. So, it can be used as an alternative to the computed tomography angiography, especially when the computed tomography angiography and the use of gadolinium are contraindicated.","PeriodicalId":46359,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis","volume":"96 ","pages":"526 - 530"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ecdt.ecdt_62_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a serious condition and has a clinical dilemma in diagnosis. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is a gold standard in its diagnosis, but MRI has proven a good role in PE diagnosis. Aim The aim of this work was to evaluate the role of noncontrast magnetic resonance pulmonary angiography (MRPA) imaging in diagnosis of acute PE using CTPA as a gold standard. Patients and methods In total, 25 patients with PE confirmed by CTPA were included in this study. All patients underwent computed tomography angiography and noncontrast MRPA on the same day or within three consecutive days. The results were compared and statistically analyzed. Results The mean age of the study group was 46.4 ± 13.5 years. Females represent 60% (15/25) and males represent 40% (10/25). The per-vessel sensitivity of noncontrast MRPA reached to about 100% with specificity 100% at the level of the main trunk, right and left main pulmonary arteries down to segmental arteries. The sensitivity for right subsegmental branches was 25% and left subsegmental branches was 33.3%. Conclusion The noncontrast MRPA has a reasonable sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of PE, especially in major branches. So, it can be used as an alternative to the computed tomography angiography, especially when the computed tomography angiography and the use of gadolinium are contraindicated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非对比磁共振肺成像在肺栓塞诊断中的作用
肺栓塞(PE)是一种严重的疾病,临床诊断困难。ct肺血管造影(CTPA)是其诊断的金标准,但MRI已被证明在PE诊断中具有良好的作用。目的以非对比磁共振肺血管造影(MRPA)为金标准,评价其在急性PE诊断中的作用。患者与方法本研究共纳入25例经CTPA确诊的PE患者。所有患者在同一天或连续三天内接受了计算机断层血管造影和非对比MRPA检查。对结果进行比较和统计分析。结果研究组患者平均年龄46.4±13.5岁。女性占60%(15/25),男性占40%(10/25)。在主干、左右肺动脉主干至节段动脉水平,非对比MRPA的单支敏感性可达100%左右,特异性为100%。右亚节段分支敏感性为25%,左亚节段分支敏感性为33.3%。结论非对比MRPA对PE的诊断具有合理的敏感性和特异性,尤其是对大分支PE的诊断。因此,它可以作为计算机断层血管造影的替代方法,特别是当计算机断层血管造影和钆的使用是禁忌的时候。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of The Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis aims to publish and inform readers and all chest physicians of the progress in medical research concerning all aspect of chest diseases. Publications include original articles review articles, editorials, case studies and reports which are relevant to chest diseases. The Journal also aims to highlight recent updates in chest medicine. . Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
期刊最新文献
Escalation to invasive mechanical ventilation in noninvasive ventilation failure: some insights about methodology Effect of physiotherapy and its frequency on the outcome of COVID-19 patients regarding acute care setting at isolation unit of Ain Shams University Role of interleukin-6 in coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia: sensitive marker of inflammation, a predictor of ventilatory support and early marker of post-coronavirus disease lung fibrosis. A single center experience Diagnostic performance of transthoracic ultrasound in patients with pulmonary embolism Proportion and prognosis of ICU-admitted coronavirus disease 2019-infected patients in relation to all hospitalized cases in Abbasia Chest Hospital, Cairo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1