A systematic review of attributes used in choice experiments for agri-environmental contracts

IF 1.8 Q2 ECONOMICS Bio-based and Applied Economics Pub Date : 2021-10-28 DOI:10.36253/bae-9678
Nidhi Raina, M. Zavalloni, S. Targetti, R. D’Alberto, M. Raggi, D. Viaggi
{"title":"A systematic review of attributes used in choice experiments for agri-environmental contracts","authors":"Nidhi Raina, M. Zavalloni, S. Targetti, R. D’Alberto, M. Raggi, D. Viaggi","doi":"10.36253/bae-9678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contract attributes are strong motivators for eliciting farmers’ preferences for a particular agri-environmental scheme. Our study aims to conduct a systematic literature review to highlight the attributes used in choice experiment studies of agri-environmental schemes using the PRISMA framework. We obtained 34 studies for an in-depth review, through which we extracted 32 attributes that were classified into five typologies: ‘monetary’ (7 attributes), ‘general’ (4 attributes), ‘flexibility’ (6 attributes), ‘prescription’ (12 attributes), and ‘purpose’ (3 attributes). Though monetary attributes should theoretically define farmers’ choices; general design and flexibility attributes are more critical for farmers’ participation and willingness to accept. The study also discusses the lesser-used attributes that could be potentially explored in future studies. Thus, our review can be used as a reference by future AES studies to select their bundle of choice attributes and test with a broader range of attributes in their choice experiments.","PeriodicalId":44385,"journal":{"name":"Bio-based and Applied Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bio-based and Applied Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-9678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Contract attributes are strong motivators for eliciting farmers’ preferences for a particular agri-environmental scheme. Our study aims to conduct a systematic literature review to highlight the attributes used in choice experiment studies of agri-environmental schemes using the PRISMA framework. We obtained 34 studies for an in-depth review, through which we extracted 32 attributes that were classified into five typologies: ‘monetary’ (7 attributes), ‘general’ (4 attributes), ‘flexibility’ (6 attributes), ‘prescription’ (12 attributes), and ‘purpose’ (3 attributes). Though monetary attributes should theoretically define farmers’ choices; general design and flexibility attributes are more critical for farmers’ participation and willingness to accept. The study also discusses the lesser-used attributes that could be potentially explored in future studies. Thus, our review can be used as a reference by future AES studies to select their bundle of choice attributes and test with a broader range of attributes in their choice experiments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农业-环境契约选择实验中使用的属性的系统回顾
契约属性是促使农民选择特定农业环境方案的强大激励因素。本研究旨在进行系统的文献综述,以突出使用PRISMA框架的农业环境方案选择实验研究中使用的属性。我们获得了34项研究进行深入审查,从中提取了32个属性,分为五种类型:“货币”(7个属性),“一般”(4个属性),“灵活性”(6个属性),“处方”(12个属性)和“目的”(3个属性)。虽然货币属性理论上应该定义农民的选择;一般设计和灵活性属性对农民的参与和接受意愿更为关键。该研究还讨论了在未来的研究中可能探索的较少使用的属性。因此,我们的综述可以为未来的AES研究提供参考,以选择他们的选择属性束,并在他们的选择实验中使用更广泛的属性进行测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Bio-based and Applied Economics (BAE) provides a forum for presentation and discussion of applied research in the field of bio-based sectors and related policies, informing evidence-based decision-making and policy-making. It intends to provide a scholarly source of theoretical and applied studies while remaining widely accessible for non-researchers. BAE seeks applied contributions on the economics of bio-based industries, such as agriculture, forestry, fishery and food, dealing with any related disciplines, such as resource and environmental economics, consumer studies, regional economics, innovation and development economics. Beside well-established fields of research related to these sectors, BAE aims in particular to explore cross-sectoral, recent and emerging themes characterizing the integrated management of biological resources, bio-based industries and sustainable development of rural areas. A special attention is also paid to the linkages between local and international dimensions.
期刊最新文献
New pathways for improved delivery of public goods from agriculture and forestry Towards a holistic approach to sustainable risk management in agriculture in the EU: a literature review Modelling technical efficiency of horticulture farming in Kosovo: An application of data envelopment analysis Reducing food-related economic loss to improve food security and cattle trade in the Sahel: the case of agropastoral systems in Senegal Incorporating expert knowledge in the estimate of farmers’ opportunity cost of supplying environmental services in rural Cameroon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1