Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pemberian Kredit Tanpa Agunan Untuk Modal Usaha Dengan Prudential Principle dan The Five C of Credit Analysis

IF 0.4 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research Pub Date : 2022-10-31 DOI:10.15408/jlr.v4i5.28900
Wiwit Rahmawati, R. L. Sinaulan, Januar Agung Saputera
{"title":"Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pemberian Kredit Tanpa Agunan Untuk Modal Usaha Dengan Prudential Principle dan The Five C of Credit Analysis","authors":"Wiwit Rahmawati, R. L. Sinaulan, Januar Agung Saputera","doi":"10.15408/jlr.v4i5.28900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When extending credit to consumers, banks and financial institutions will always take precautions to protect themselves if the credit recipient (debtor) defaults or is unable to repay the credit. If the credit is followed by the binding of collateral, this prevention occurs. If the debtor defaults, the guarantee will serve as a replacement for credit payments made by banks and other financial institutions. In accordance with Article 2 letter b of Law No. 10 of 1998 pertaining to Banking, a violation of the precautionary principle in the provision of credit by banks carries legal repercussions, including the imposition of criminal punishment or fines. This study employs a qualitative descriptive methodology. According to the findings of this study, the granting of credit by banks needs cautious action on the part of the bank. The risk associated with extending credit is so large that it is necessary to evaluate whether the prospective debtor is deserving of credit. In banking practice, both persons and legal entities can apply for credit. Each candidate must satisfy the bank's predetermined criteria.","PeriodicalId":40374,"journal":{"name":"ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research","volume":"40 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v4i5.28900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When extending credit to consumers, banks and financial institutions will always take precautions to protect themselves if the credit recipient (debtor) defaults or is unable to repay the credit. If the credit is followed by the binding of collateral, this prevention occurs. If the debtor defaults, the guarantee will serve as a replacement for credit payments made by banks and other financial institutions. In accordance with Article 2 letter b of Law No. 10 of 1998 pertaining to Banking, a violation of the precautionary principle in the provision of credit by banks carries legal repercussions, including the imposition of criminal punishment or fines. This study employs a qualitative descriptive methodology. According to the findings of this study, the granting of credit by banks needs cautious action on the part of the bank. The risk associated with extending credit is so large that it is necessary to evaluate whether the prospective debtor is deserving of credit. In banking practice, both persons and legal entities can apply for credit. Each candidate must satisfy the bank's predetermined criteria.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当向消费者提供信贷时,银行和金融机构总是会采取预防措施来保护自己,以防信贷接受者(债务人)违约或无法偿还信贷。如果信用证之后有抵押品的约束,这种预防就发生了。如果债务人违约,担保将作为银行和其他金融机构信贷支付的替代。根据关于银行业的1998年第10号法律第2条b款,银行在提供信贷时违反预防原则将产生法律后果,包括处以刑事处罚或罚款。本研究采用定性描述方法。根据本研究的结果,银行的授信需要银行的谨慎行动。与延长信贷有关的风险是如此之大,以至于有必要评估未来债务人是否值得信贷。在银行业务中,个人和法人都可以申请信贷。每个候选人必须满足银行预先确定的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
Fill in the Blank? A Discussion of Prefilled Tax Returns in the U.S. Does Notice 2014-21 Need an Update? An Analysis of Potential Tax Classifications for Cryptocurrency Covers and Front Matter Editorial Policy Pathology of The Legal Gap in the Tax Collection and Payment Stage (A Comparative Study of The IRS and The United States)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1