Comparative Analysis of Fuel Economy of B30 and B20 Fuels in Passenger Vehicles

IF 0.2 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS Journal of The Japan Institute of Energy Pub Date : 2021-10-20 DOI:10.3775/jie.100.230
M. D. Solikhah, F. Karuana, A. R. Wimada, K. Amri, B. R. Barus, A. Rahmadi, A. Rochim
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Fuel Economy of B30 and B20 Fuels in Passenger Vehicles","authors":"M. D. Solikhah, F. Karuana, A. R. Wimada, K. Amri, B. R. Barus, A. Rahmadi, A. Rochim","doi":"10.3775/jie.100.230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The higher biodiesel content blended into diesel fuel gives the lower calorific value that may affect the fuel economy. To determine the effect of using 30 % biodiesel mixed in diesel fuel (B30) compared to B20, especially on fuel economy in automotive vehicles, a road test was conducted using 4 brands of passenger vehicles for 50,000 km. The daily route of this road test consisted of 10.6 % of general road, 49.9 % of climbing-downhill road, and 39.5 % of highway road, which covers a distance of 560 km per day. The method used in this study for fuel economy analysis is the full-to-full method, by comparing the fuel consumption of B30 and B20 in two vehicles in each brand (8 cars in total). Based on the test results, statistically, in testing the fuel economy with full to full method, population of data used has been normally distributed and homogeneous. In Passenger1 and Passenger4 vehicles, the average fuel economy value of B30 is 6.7 % and 3.7 % higher than the B20’s, while in vehicles Passenger2 and Passenger3, the average fuel economy value of B20 is 1.5 % and 3.9 % higher than those of B30. In addition, the results of the one way ANOVA test on data of passenger vehicles B20 and B30 shows p–value <0.05, which states the average value of fuel economy in each passenger vehicle is different based on statistical analysis. However, based on the difference of engine technology, the fuel consumption of B30 and B20 does not have a significant difference.","PeriodicalId":17318,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Japan Institute of Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Japan Institute of Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3775/jie.100.230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The higher biodiesel content blended into diesel fuel gives the lower calorific value that may affect the fuel economy. To determine the effect of using 30 % biodiesel mixed in diesel fuel (B30) compared to B20, especially on fuel economy in automotive vehicles, a road test was conducted using 4 brands of passenger vehicles for 50,000 km. The daily route of this road test consisted of 10.6 % of general road, 49.9 % of climbing-downhill road, and 39.5 % of highway road, which covers a distance of 560 km per day. The method used in this study for fuel economy analysis is the full-to-full method, by comparing the fuel consumption of B30 and B20 in two vehicles in each brand (8 cars in total). Based on the test results, statistically, in testing the fuel economy with full to full method, population of data used has been normally distributed and homogeneous. In Passenger1 and Passenger4 vehicles, the average fuel economy value of B30 is 6.7 % and 3.7 % higher than the B20’s, while in vehicles Passenger2 and Passenger3, the average fuel economy value of B20 is 1.5 % and 3.9 % higher than those of B30. In addition, the results of the one way ANOVA test on data of passenger vehicles B20 and B30 shows p–value <0.05, which states the average value of fuel economy in each passenger vehicle is different based on statistical analysis. However, based on the difference of engine technology, the fuel consumption of B30 and B20 does not have a significant difference.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乘用车B30和B20燃料燃油经济性比较分析
混合到柴油燃料中的生物柴油含量越高,热值越低,这可能会影响燃料经济性。为了确定使用30%生物柴油混合柴油(B30)与B20相比的效果,特别是对汽车燃油经济性的影响,使用4个品牌的乘用车进行了50,000公里的道路试验。本次路试日路线由10.6%的普通公路、49.9%的爬坡下坡公路、39.5%的高速公路组成,日行程560公里。本研究使用的燃油经济性分析方法是full-to-full法,通过比较每个品牌两辆车(共8辆车)B30和B20的油耗。根据试验结果,从统计上看,在用满到满方法进行燃油经济性测试时,所使用的数据总体是正态分布的,是均匀的。在乘用车1和乘用车4中,B30的平均燃油经济性比B20高6.7%和3.7%,而在乘用车2和乘用车3中,B20的平均燃油经济性比B30高1.5%和3.9%。此外,乘用车B20和B30数据的单因素方差分析结果显示p值<0.05,说明通过统计分析,每辆乘用车的燃油经济性平均值不同。然而,基于发动机技术的差异,B30和B20的油耗没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
英文目次 和文目次 Evaluation of Hydrochar from the Lignocellulose Component Using the Color Intensity 和文目次 英文目次
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1