Impact of the Land Use Act on Land Tenural System in Nigeria

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW American Journal of Law & Medicine Pub Date : 2022-10-10 DOI:10.47672/ajl.1226
D. K. Derri,  Josephine Nkeonye Egemonu
{"title":"Impact of the Land Use Act on Land Tenural System in Nigeria","authors":"D. K. Derri,  Josephine Nkeonye Egemonu","doi":"10.47672/ajl.1226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Before the advent of the Land Use Act in 1978, individuals, families and communities owned land absolutely according to customary law. Thus, the family or community was free to give out their land to deserving members of the family or community or even to outsiders as the case may be. Where an individual was the absolute owner of the land, he was free to deal with it in any manner he liked. Therefore, the individual, family or community exercised all incidents of ownership without restrictions. All these were altered when the Land Use Act was promulgated. The extent to which this Act affected the existing land tenural system in Nigeria is discussed in this article. This article critically analyses the land tenure system under both conventional land law and customary land tenure in Nigeria. \nMethodology: Applying doctrinal research methodology, it uses some available resources in some Nigerian libraries, both online and offline. \nFindings: It concluded that the provisions of the Land Use Act have severe consequences on land tenural system in Nigeria. \nRecommendations: In view of the challenges highlighted in the Act, this article recommends among other things that the State Governors need to improve and quicken the process of issuing certificates of occupancy and payment of adequate compensation after revocation of tittle to land to forestall unnecessary litigation  and that there should be a land reform that recognizes the rights of individuals or communities to land either freehold (indefinite absolutely) or for a relatively long-term duration. This will ensure a genuine free market economy.       ","PeriodicalId":7680,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Law & Medicine","volume":"79 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Law & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47672/ajl.1226","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Before the advent of the Land Use Act in 1978, individuals, families and communities owned land absolutely according to customary law. Thus, the family or community was free to give out their land to deserving members of the family or community or even to outsiders as the case may be. Where an individual was the absolute owner of the land, he was free to deal with it in any manner he liked. Therefore, the individual, family or community exercised all incidents of ownership without restrictions. All these were altered when the Land Use Act was promulgated. The extent to which this Act affected the existing land tenural system in Nigeria is discussed in this article. This article critically analyses the land tenure system under both conventional land law and customary land tenure in Nigeria. Methodology: Applying doctrinal research methodology, it uses some available resources in some Nigerian libraries, both online and offline. Findings: It concluded that the provisions of the Land Use Act have severe consequences on land tenural system in Nigeria. Recommendations: In view of the challenges highlighted in the Act, this article recommends among other things that the State Governors need to improve and quicken the process of issuing certificates of occupancy and payment of adequate compensation after revocation of tittle to land to forestall unnecessary litigation  and that there should be a land reform that recognizes the rights of individuals or communities to land either freehold (indefinite absolutely) or for a relatively long-term duration. This will ensure a genuine free market economy.       
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《土地使用法》对尼日利亚土地权属制度的影响
目的:在1978年《土地使用法》颁布之前,个人、家庭和社区完全根据习惯法拥有土地。因此,家庭或社区可以视情况自由地将其土地分给家庭或社区中有资格的成员,甚至分给外人。当一个人是土地的绝对所有者时,他可以自由地以任何他喜欢的方式处理土地。因此,个人、家庭或社区不受限制地行使所有所有权。这些都在《土地使用法》颁布后发生了变化。本文将讨论该法案对尼日利亚现有土地所有权制度的影响程度。本文批判性地分析了尼日利亚传统土地法和习惯土地法下的土地权属制度。方法:应用理论研究方法,它使用一些可用的资源在一些尼日利亚图书馆,在线和离线。结论:《土地使用法》的规定对尼日利亚的土地使用权制度产生了严重的影响。建议:鉴于该法案所强调的挑战,本文除其他事项外建议,州长需要改进和加快在撤销土地所有权后颁发占用证书和支付适当补偿的程序,以防止不必要的诉讼,并应进行土地改革,承认个人或社区对土地的权利,要么是永久保有(无限期绝对),要么是相对长期的。这将确保真正的自由市场经济。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: desde Enero 2004 Último Numero: Octubre 2008 AJLM will solicit blind comments from expert peer reviewers, including faculty members of our editorial board, as well as from other preeminent health law and public policy academics and professionals from across the country and around the world.
期刊最新文献
A Protected Class, An Unprotected Condition, and A Biomarker - A Method/Formula for Increased Diversity in Clinical Trials for the African American Subject with Benign Ethnic Neutropenia (BEN) - CORRIGENDUM. "The Timeless Explosion of Fantasy's Dream": How State Courts Have Ignored the Supreme Court's Decision in Panetti v. Quarterman - ERRATUM. Mental Health Matters: A Look At Abortion Law Post-Dobbs - ERRATUM. Abortion Access for Women in Custody in the Wake of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health. How The "Great Resignation" and COVID Unemployment Have Eroded the Employer Sponsored Insurance Model and Access to Healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1