{"title":"The Implementation of Musyarakah by PT Bank Aceh Branch of Banda Aceh, Indonesia","authors":"J. Andria, Darmawan Darmawan, A. Azhari","doi":"10.28946/slrev.Vol3.Iss1.195.pp99-110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to Article 19 Paragraph (1) of the Law Number 21 of 2008 concerning Sharia Banking, one of the activities of Sharia Banking is to provide financial funding based on musyarakah (profit sharing). The implementation of musyarakah by PT Bank Aceh Syariah in Banda Aceh has been covered up to 85 customers from the period of 2015 to 2017. In musyarakah contract the customers have to fulfil their obligations to pay the payments to the bank. However, the fact shows that the customers could not fulfil their obligations to pay their payments to the bank because they have income problems in running their businesses. From 2015 to 2017 there were seven customers were not well performed musyarakah. This condition has resulted in breach of contract by the customers which is known as non-performing musyarakah funding. This study aims to scrutinize legal consequences arising from non-performing musyarakah funding and identify the efforts taken in the settlement of this problem. This study is an empirical juridical research. Data required for this study were collected through field research by interviewing respondents or informants. The result shows that the legal consequences arising from this non-performing musyarakah funding were pledges or defaults by the customers because they violate the Article 12 of Musyarakah contract. The efforts taken in settling this problem among others are collecting the arrear obligations and handling non-performing musyarakah to the bank’s officer to be analysed based on legal analysis. Therefore, it is advised that the customers should fully fulfil their obligation to pay their payments to the bank based on musyarakah contract. Then, the bank officers are suggested to fully analyse the arrear obligations of the customers based on legal analysis. By doing so it could reduce non-performing musyarakah funding in the future","PeriodicalId":32073,"journal":{"name":"Sriwijaya Law Review","volume":"84 3-4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sriwijaya Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol3.Iss1.195.pp99-110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
According to Article 19 Paragraph (1) of the Law Number 21 of 2008 concerning Sharia Banking, one of the activities of Sharia Banking is to provide financial funding based on musyarakah (profit sharing). The implementation of musyarakah by PT Bank Aceh Syariah in Banda Aceh has been covered up to 85 customers from the period of 2015 to 2017. In musyarakah contract the customers have to fulfil their obligations to pay the payments to the bank. However, the fact shows that the customers could not fulfil their obligations to pay their payments to the bank because they have income problems in running their businesses. From 2015 to 2017 there were seven customers were not well performed musyarakah. This condition has resulted in breach of contract by the customers which is known as non-performing musyarakah funding. This study aims to scrutinize legal consequences arising from non-performing musyarakah funding and identify the efforts taken in the settlement of this problem. This study is an empirical juridical research. Data required for this study were collected through field research by interviewing respondents or informants. The result shows that the legal consequences arising from this non-performing musyarakah funding were pledges or defaults by the customers because they violate the Article 12 of Musyarakah contract. The efforts taken in settling this problem among others are collecting the arrear obligations and handling non-performing musyarakah to the bank’s officer to be analysed based on legal analysis. Therefore, it is advised that the customers should fully fulfil their obligation to pay their payments to the bank based on musyarakah contract. Then, the bank officers are suggested to fully analyse the arrear obligations of the customers based on legal analysis. By doing so it could reduce non-performing musyarakah funding in the future
根据2008年关于伊斯兰银行的第21号法律第19条第(1)款,伊斯兰银行的活动之一是提供基于musyarakah(利润分享)的金融资金。PT Bank Aceh Syariah在班达亚齐实施的musyarakah在2015年至2017年期间覆盖了多达85个客户。在musyarakah合同中,客户必须履行向银行付款的义务。然而,事实表明,由于客户在经营业务中存在收入问题,他们无法履行向银行付款的义务。从2015年到2017年,有7个客户没有很好地执行musyarakah。这种情况导致客户违反合同,这被称为不良的musyarakah资金。本研究的目的是审查不良的musyarakah资金所产生的法律后果,并确定为解决这一问题所作的努力。本研究是一项实证法学研究。本研究所需的数据是通过实地调查,通过访谈受访者或举报人收集的。结果表明,由于客户违反了musyarakah合同第12条,因此该不良musyarakah资金产生的法律后果是质押或违约。除其他外,为解决这一问题所作的努力包括收集拖欠债务和将不良贷款交给银行官员进行法律分析。因此,建议客户应充分履行其义务,根据musyarakah合同向银行支付款项。然后,建议银行管理人员在法律分析的基础上对客户的拖欠义务进行充分的分析。通过这样做,它可以减少未来的不良资金