Microaggression Among Registered Nurses: An Exploratory Study

Saige M. Addison
{"title":"Microaggression Among Registered Nurses: An Exploratory Study","authors":"Saige M. Addison","doi":"10.7771/2158-4052.1574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this mixed method study, RNs (N = 22) completed the “Acceptability of Racial Microaggressions Scale” (ARMS, based on Mekawi and Todd’s 2018 research) before reading a vignette depicting a Black man in the emergency room. Subsequently, participants responded to three open-ended questions. Results revealed that there was overall low agreement with the ARMS subscales, indicating that the participants were generally unlikely to endorse microaggression; however, the Color Evasion subscale had the greatest agreement (M = 2.701). This suggests a greater adherence to colorblind beliefs and ideology than other forms of microaggression within the sample. The open-ended responses generated three themes: helpfulness, emotional (in)attentiveness, and emergency response. Helpfulness included a desire to assist the patient and obtain the patient’s compliance. Emotional (in)attentiveness was characterized by observations of the patient’s emotions, yet a subsequent lack of acknowledgment of the patient’s feelings. Finally, emergency response encompassed the medical observations and recommendations of the RNs.","PeriodicalId":30386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Purdue Undergraduate Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Purdue Undergraduate Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7771/2158-4052.1574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this mixed method study, RNs (N = 22) completed the “Acceptability of Racial Microaggressions Scale” (ARMS, based on Mekawi and Todd’s 2018 research) before reading a vignette depicting a Black man in the emergency room. Subsequently, participants responded to three open-ended questions. Results revealed that there was overall low agreement with the ARMS subscales, indicating that the participants were generally unlikely to endorse microaggression; however, the Color Evasion subscale had the greatest agreement (M = 2.701). This suggests a greater adherence to colorblind beliefs and ideology than other forms of microaggression within the sample. The open-ended responses generated three themes: helpfulness, emotional (in)attentiveness, and emergency response. Helpfulness included a desire to assist the patient and obtain the patient’s compliance. Emotional (in)attentiveness was characterized by observations of the patient’s emotions, yet a subsequent lack of acknowledgment of the patient’s feelings. Finally, emergency response encompassed the medical observations and recommendations of the RNs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
注册护士微攻击行为的探索性研究
在这项混合方法研究中,注册护士(N = 22)完成了“种族微侵犯可接受性量表”(ARMS,基于Mekawi和Todd 2018年的研究),然后阅读了一幅描绘急诊室黑人男子的小插图。随后,参与者回答了三个开放式问题。结果显示,被试与ARMS量表的一致性总体较低,表明被试一般不太可能认可微攻击行为;逃避颜色分量表的一致性最高(M = 2.701)。这表明,在样本中,与其他形式的微侵犯相比,他们更坚持色盲的信仰和意识形态。开放式的回答产生了三个主题:乐于助人、情感关注和紧急反应。乐于助人包括帮助病人的愿望和获得病人的顺从。情感关注的特点是观察病人的情绪,但随后缺乏对病人感受的承认。最后,应急反应包括注册护士的医疗观察和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Contending with COVID: Examining Levels of Anxiety Among College-Aged Adults in the Wake of the Pandemic Feasibility of Incorporating the Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training Program into Nursing Education The Correlation Between Perceived Discrimination and Social Anxiety in College Students Who Identify as LGBTQ Measuring the Relationship between the Big Five Personality Traits and Time Spent on Social Media Front Matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1