{"title":"Microaggression Among Registered Nurses: An Exploratory Study","authors":"Saige M. Addison","doi":"10.7771/2158-4052.1574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this mixed method study, RNs (N = 22) completed the “Acceptability of Racial Microaggressions Scale” (ARMS, based on Mekawi and Todd’s 2018 research) before reading a vignette depicting a Black man in the emergency room. Subsequently, participants responded to three open-ended questions. Results revealed that there was overall low agreement with the ARMS subscales, indicating that the participants were generally unlikely to endorse microaggression; however, the Color Evasion subscale had the greatest agreement (M = 2.701). This suggests a greater adherence to colorblind beliefs and ideology than other forms of microaggression within the sample. The open-ended responses generated three themes: helpfulness, emotional (in)attentiveness, and emergency response. Helpfulness included a desire to assist the patient and obtain the patient’s compliance. Emotional (in)attentiveness was characterized by observations of the patient’s emotions, yet a subsequent lack of acknowledgment of the patient’s feelings. Finally, emergency response encompassed the medical observations and recommendations of the RNs.","PeriodicalId":30386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Purdue Undergraduate Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Purdue Undergraduate Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7771/2158-4052.1574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this mixed method study, RNs (N = 22) completed the “Acceptability of Racial Microaggressions Scale” (ARMS, based on Mekawi and Todd’s 2018 research) before reading a vignette depicting a Black man in the emergency room. Subsequently, participants responded to three open-ended questions. Results revealed that there was overall low agreement with the ARMS subscales, indicating that the participants were generally unlikely to endorse microaggression; however, the Color Evasion subscale had the greatest agreement (M = 2.701). This suggests a greater adherence to colorblind beliefs and ideology than other forms of microaggression within the sample. The open-ended responses generated three themes: helpfulness, emotional (in)attentiveness, and emergency response. Helpfulness included a desire to assist the patient and obtain the patient’s compliance. Emotional (in)attentiveness was characterized by observations of the patient’s emotions, yet a subsequent lack of acknowledgment of the patient’s feelings. Finally, emergency response encompassed the medical observations and recommendations of the RNs.