Electrotechnological Heat Treatment of Milk: Energy and Exergy Efficiency

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Food Processing: Techniques and Technology Pub Date : 2023-06-23 DOI:10.21603/2074-9414-2023-2-2428
A. Bagaev, S. Bobrovskiy
{"title":"Electrotechnological Heat Treatment of Milk: Energy and Exergy Efficiency","authors":"A. Bagaev, S. Bobrovskiy","doi":"10.21603/2074-9414-2023-2-2428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dairy industry needs new and more energy-efficient technological procedure for milk pasteurization. This article introduces a comparative efficiency assessment of various milk pasteurization technologies and electrotechnological means. \nThe study featured milk, which was heated from 20 to 75°C with a capacity of 1000 kg/h at an estimated power of 58.95 kW. The treatment involved a steam-to-milk pasteurizer with electric indirect or direct heating, an induction pasteurizer, and a thermosiphon pasteurizer with direct or indirect electric heating. The study relied on the methods of energy and exergy analyses. \nThe system of steam-to-milk pasteurizer with electric indirect (elemental, induction) or direct (electrode) heating demonstrated the following indicators: exergy loss – 1.29 kW, power consumption – 71.29 kW, exergy efficiency – 0.99, energy efficiency – 0.827. The thermosiphon pasteurizer with direct or indirect electric heating demonstrated the following properties: exergy loss – 1.29 kW, power consumption – 60.92 kW, exergy efficiency – 0.99, energy efficiency – 0.9676. The induction pasteurizer had the least competitive parameters: exergy loss – 10.8 kW, power consumption – 70.43 kW, exergy efficiency – 0.867, energy efficiency – 0.837. \nThe thermosiphon pasteurizer with direct or indirect electric heating was able to increase the energy efficiency of milk pasteurization, while the induction pasteurizer proved to be a promising R&D direction.","PeriodicalId":12335,"journal":{"name":"Food Processing: Techniques and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Processing: Techniques and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2023-2-2428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The dairy industry needs new and more energy-efficient technological procedure for milk pasteurization. This article introduces a comparative efficiency assessment of various milk pasteurization technologies and electrotechnological means. The study featured milk, which was heated from 20 to 75°C with a capacity of 1000 kg/h at an estimated power of 58.95 kW. The treatment involved a steam-to-milk pasteurizer with electric indirect or direct heating, an induction pasteurizer, and a thermosiphon pasteurizer with direct or indirect electric heating. The study relied on the methods of energy and exergy analyses. The system of steam-to-milk pasteurizer with electric indirect (elemental, induction) or direct (electrode) heating demonstrated the following indicators: exergy loss – 1.29 kW, power consumption – 71.29 kW, exergy efficiency – 0.99, energy efficiency – 0.827. The thermosiphon pasteurizer with direct or indirect electric heating demonstrated the following properties: exergy loss – 1.29 kW, power consumption – 60.92 kW, exergy efficiency – 0.99, energy efficiency – 0.9676. The induction pasteurizer had the least competitive parameters: exergy loss – 10.8 kW, power consumption – 70.43 kW, exergy efficiency – 0.867, energy efficiency – 0.837. The thermosiphon pasteurizer with direct or indirect electric heating was able to increase the energy efficiency of milk pasteurization, while the induction pasteurizer proved to be a promising R&D direction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牛奶的电热处理:能量与能量效率
乳制品行业需要新的和更节能的牛奶巴氏杀菌技术程序。本文介绍了各种牛奶巴氏灭菌技术和电工手段的效率比较评价。该研究以牛奶为特色,将其从20°C加热到75°C,容量为1000 kg/h,估计功率为58.95 kW。处理包括电间接或直接加热的蒸汽制奶巴氏灭菌器、感应巴氏灭菌器和直接或间接电加热的热虹吸巴氏灭菌器。该研究采用了能量分析和火用分析的方法。采用电间接加热(元素加热、感应加热)或直接加热(电极加热)的蒸汽制奶巴氏杀菌机系统显示出以下指标:火用损失1.29 kW,功耗71.29 kW,火用效率0.99,能效0.827。采用直接或间接电加热的热虹吸巴氏杀菌机表现出以下特性:火用损失- 1.29 kW,功耗- 60.92 kW,火用效率- 0.99,能源效率- 0.9676。感应巴氏杀菌机的竞争参数最低:火用损失为10.8 kW,功率消耗为70.43 kW,火用效率为0.867,能效为0.837。采用直接或间接电加热的热虹吸巴氏灭菌器能够提高牛奶巴氏灭菌的能源效率,而感应巴氏灭菌器是一个很有前途的研发方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Processing: Techniques and Technology
Food Processing: Techniques and Technology Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mycelial Biomass Enzymes of Cordyceps militaris and Lentinula edodes in Baking Technology Histological Studies of Sous Vide Beef Based on Best Practices in Meat Quality Formation Phytochemical and antioxidant composition of crude water extracts of Chlorella vulgaris and its effects on Saccharomyces cerevisiae growth in an ethanolic medium Native Microbiota of Rapeseed Cake as Potential Source of Industrial Producers Beliy Zhemchug Activated Complex: Effect on Quality and Yield of Commercial Apples after Long-Term Storage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1