THE PRACTICE OF DEMOCRATIZATION OF EDUCATION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS AND CHINESE SCHOOLS IN MALAYSIA

Mohd Syuja Saedin, N. Hassan, Nora Buhari, Taufik A. Latif, Nik Norazira Abdul Aziz
{"title":"THE PRACTICE OF DEMOCRATIZATION OF EDUCATION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS AND CHINESE SCHOOLS IN MALAYSIA","authors":"Mohd Syuja Saedin, N. Hassan, Nora Buhari, Taufik A. Latif, Nik Norazira Abdul Aziz","doi":"10.35631/ijmoe.517026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existence of Islamic Religious Schools (IRS) and Chinese Schools (CS) preceeded the history of the formation of the country and developed along with the various educational policies implemented by the government until it successfully dignified its position in the current of national education. However, the managers in both types of schools were found to be in conflict with the government in fighting for their educational rights. The conflict between school managers and the government is about maintaining the main goal of school establishment or the school’s traditional curriculum, namely the Diniah curriculum (IRS) and the Chinese language and culture curriculum (CS). In addition, school managers also experience conflicts of overlapping management powers between the School Management Board (SMB) and the government, the ambiguity of education rights based on national legislation and a lack of justice from the aspect of government financial aid distribution. This study aims to examine the practice of democratization of education that exists in the management of both types of schools. In this qualitative study, data was collected through semi-structured interviews with two managers from IRS and two CS managers in Malaysia. The findings of the study show that the government is seen to be practicing imperfect democracy in fulfilling the four aspects of both types of schools’ educational rights, namely the main goal of establishing schools, management authority, legislation and the distribution of financial aid. This government’s practice shows the spirit of democratization of education that prioritizes the direction of the national education policy to meet the country’s aspirations in facing the needs of the 21th century.","PeriodicalId":36486,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35631/ijmoe.517026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The existence of Islamic Religious Schools (IRS) and Chinese Schools (CS) preceeded the history of the formation of the country and developed along with the various educational policies implemented by the government until it successfully dignified its position in the current of national education. However, the managers in both types of schools were found to be in conflict with the government in fighting for their educational rights. The conflict between school managers and the government is about maintaining the main goal of school establishment or the school’s traditional curriculum, namely the Diniah curriculum (IRS) and the Chinese language and culture curriculum (CS). In addition, school managers also experience conflicts of overlapping management powers between the School Management Board (SMB) and the government, the ambiguity of education rights based on national legislation and a lack of justice from the aspect of government financial aid distribution. This study aims to examine the practice of democratization of education that exists in the management of both types of schools. In this qualitative study, data was collected through semi-structured interviews with two managers from IRS and two CS managers in Malaysia. The findings of the study show that the government is seen to be practicing imperfect democracy in fulfilling the four aspects of both types of schools’ educational rights, namely the main goal of establishing schools, management authority, legislation and the distribution of financial aid. This government’s practice shows the spirit of democratization of education that prioritizes the direction of the national education policy to meet the country’s aspirations in facing the needs of the 21th century.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚伊斯兰教宗教学校与华人学校管理中教育民主化的实践
伊斯兰宗教学校(IRS)和华文学校(CS)的存在早于国家形成的历史,并随着政府实施的各种教育政策而发展,直到成功地在当前的国民教育中彰显其地位。然而,这两种类型的学校的管理者都被发现与政府发生冲突,以争取他们的教育权利。学校管理者与政府之间的冲突是关于维持学校建立的主要目标或学校的传统课程,即Diniah课程(IRS)和中国语言文化课程(CS)。此外,学校管理者还面临着学校管理委员会与政府管理权力重叠的冲突、国家立法对教育权利的模糊、政府资助分配方面的不公正等问题。本研究旨在检视两类学校管理中存在的教育民主化实践。在这个定性研究中,数据是通过半结构化访谈收集的,来自马来西亚国税局的两名经理和两名CS经理。研究结果表明,政府在实现两类学校的教育权利的四个方面,即建立学校的主要目标、管理权限、立法和财政资助的分配,都是在实践不完善的民主。本届政府的实践体现了教育民主化的精神,为满足21世纪的需要,优先考虑国家教育政策的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Algorithm and ProgrammingEducation through Collaborative BlendedLearning: A Problem-Based Approach for FirstYear Students Review the Prospects and Obstacles of AIEnhanced Learning Environments: The Role ofChatGPT in Education A Hybrid Method based on Rules and DeepLearning for Enhancing Single-Word and MultiWord Aspects Extraction from French Reviews Communicative Tasks as a Means of Developingthe Emotional Intelligence of Students Students’ Results Prediction Using MachineLearning Algorithms and Online Learning duringthe COVID-19 Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1