Competition in coastal waters: customs sloops and Admiralty cruisers in eighteenth-century Britain

Q3 Arts and Humanities Journal for Maritime Research Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/21533369.2021.1898274
H. Ziegler
{"title":"Competition in coastal waters: customs sloops and Admiralty cruisers in eighteenth-century Britain","authors":"H. Ziegler","doi":"10.1080/21533369.2021.1898274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article explores the relationship between the Customs and the Admiralty as agents of anti-smuggling prevention and policing in British coastal waters during the long-eighteenth century. This relationship was, at first glance, embedded in an ostensible rhetoric of co-operation. In reality, however, the various actors operated in stark competition to each other, occasioned by monetary rewards. It is argued here that such competition was seen as beneficial for the coastal duty by central administrators. Competition was the easiest means to keeping transaction costs – in the form of fraud, collusion, and negligence – low. The agenda of central departments was thus ultimately served best by encouraging rivalry over co-operation. This line of inquiry also serves to complicate typically simplistic representations of smuggling which see the efforts of state actors unanimously pitched against the smugglers. Various central institutions followed their own agenda in the anti-smuggling business, and it was the task of the Customs Board to reconcile such agendas into a coherent effort. The present case offers a suitable field to explore this complexity. It also speaks to wider concerns regarding the eighteenth-century state, such as the nature of inter-departmental rivalry and the role of contractual arrangements between private interests and the state.","PeriodicalId":38023,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Maritime Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21533369.2021.1898274","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Maritime Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21533369.2021.1898274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article explores the relationship between the Customs and the Admiralty as agents of anti-smuggling prevention and policing in British coastal waters during the long-eighteenth century. This relationship was, at first glance, embedded in an ostensible rhetoric of co-operation. In reality, however, the various actors operated in stark competition to each other, occasioned by monetary rewards. It is argued here that such competition was seen as beneficial for the coastal duty by central administrators. Competition was the easiest means to keeping transaction costs – in the form of fraud, collusion, and negligence – low. The agenda of central departments was thus ultimately served best by encouraging rivalry over co-operation. This line of inquiry also serves to complicate typically simplistic representations of smuggling which see the efforts of state actors unanimously pitched against the smugglers. Various central institutions followed their own agenda in the anti-smuggling business, and it was the task of the Customs Board to reconcile such agendas into a coherent effort. The present case offers a suitable field to explore this complexity. It also speaks to wider concerns regarding the eighteenth-century state, such as the nature of inter-departmental rivalry and the role of contractual arrangements between private interests and the state.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沿海水域的竞争:18世纪英国的海关单桅帆船和海军部巡洋舰
本文探讨了在漫长的18世纪中,海关与海军部作为英国沿海地区反走私预防和警务机构之间的关系。乍一看,这种关系隐含在表面上的合作修辞之中。然而,在现实中,不同的参与者在金钱奖励的驱使下,彼此之间展开了激烈的竞争。本文认为,这种竞争被中央行政官视为有利于沿海义务。竞争是保持交易成本(以欺诈、勾结和疏忽的形式)较低的最简单手段。因此,鼓励竞争而非合作,最终最有利于中央部门的议程。这条调查路线也有助于使典型的简单的走私陈述复杂化,即国家行为者一致反对走私者的努力。各中央机构在反走私方面都有自己的议程,海关委员会的任务是将这些议程协调成一项连贯的努力。本案例为探讨这种复杂性提供了一个合适的领域。它还谈到了关于18世纪国家的更广泛的关注,例如部门间竞争的性质以及私人利益与国家之间契约安排的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Maritime Research
Journal for Maritime Research Arts and Humanities-History
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal for Maritime Research ( JMR ), established by the National Maritime Museum in 1999, focuses on historical enquiry at the intersections of maritime, British and global history. It champions a wide spectrum of innovative research on the maritime past. While the Journal has a particular focus on the British experience, it positions this within broad oceanic and international contexts, encouraging comparative perspectives and interdisciplinary approaches. The journal publishes research essays and reviews around 15-20 new books each year across a broad spectrum of maritime history. All research articles published in this journal undergo rigorous peer review, involving initial editor screening and independent assessment, normally by two anonymous referees.
期刊最新文献
Enrolment at the French Navy’s School of Advanced Studies in Paris from 1896 to 1899 South Sea Argonaut: James Colnett and the enlargement of the Pacific, 1772–1803 Suppressing piracy in the early eighteenth century: pirates, merchants and British imperial authority in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans The society of prisoners: Anglo-French wars and incarceration in the eighteenth century The British navy in the Caribbean
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1