{"title":"Shaping Our (Medieval) Future through Nomadic Insurgency: A Radical Reading of Ywain and Gawain","authors":"Christian Beck","doi":"10.1353/MDI.2016.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Medieval futures” connotes not necessarily the next move for medieval studies but the reshaping of our future with the medieval in mind. Medieval texts can inform and offer novel approaches to direct action, social justice, as well as social libertarian, anticapitalist, anti-Statist movements. To this end, I advocate decontextualizing medieval literary texts so that their radical possibility can inform our own spaces and movement, particularly in terms of social justice, dissent, and protest. By decontextualizing the text, I mean the removal of the literary text from its temporal and regional political context in order to allow the text to reflect the radical possibilities applicable to our current and future political environments. Reading the late medieval English text Ywain and Gawain through a lens of contemporary radical politics demonstrates how a medieval literary artifact can help us better understand—and ultimately transform—our own political realities. The occupation of physical space has been and continues to be a tried and tested means of voicing opposition against oppressive power structures. In many cases, people take to the streets and inhabit a particular place with symbolic value in order to make their dissent visible. Although the general constitution of space appears static and unchanging, redefining space allows for the resistance to the status quo. Theorists such as Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, Henri Lefebvre, Edward Soja, and David Harvey, among others, discuss the ways in which social spaces (i.e., public squares, buildings, rooms, etc.) undergo change through use and social desire. Space is malleable and plastic; it never has a set use or meaning. Lefebvre puts a finer point on this idea: “There is no sense in which space can be treated solely as an a priori condition of these institutions and the","PeriodicalId":36685,"journal":{"name":"Scripta Mediaevalia","volume":"28 1","pages":"325 - 351"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scripta Mediaevalia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/MDI.2016.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
“Medieval futures” connotes not necessarily the next move for medieval studies but the reshaping of our future with the medieval in mind. Medieval texts can inform and offer novel approaches to direct action, social justice, as well as social libertarian, anticapitalist, anti-Statist movements. To this end, I advocate decontextualizing medieval literary texts so that their radical possibility can inform our own spaces and movement, particularly in terms of social justice, dissent, and protest. By decontextualizing the text, I mean the removal of the literary text from its temporal and regional political context in order to allow the text to reflect the radical possibilities applicable to our current and future political environments. Reading the late medieval English text Ywain and Gawain through a lens of contemporary radical politics demonstrates how a medieval literary artifact can help us better understand—and ultimately transform—our own political realities. The occupation of physical space has been and continues to be a tried and tested means of voicing opposition against oppressive power structures. In many cases, people take to the streets and inhabit a particular place with symbolic value in order to make their dissent visible. Although the general constitution of space appears static and unchanging, redefining space allows for the resistance to the status quo. Theorists such as Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, Henri Lefebvre, Edward Soja, and David Harvey, among others, discuss the ways in which social spaces (i.e., public squares, buildings, rooms, etc.) undergo change through use and social desire. Space is malleable and plastic; it never has a set use or meaning. Lefebvre puts a finer point on this idea: “There is no sense in which space can be treated solely as an a priori condition of these institutions and the
“中世纪的未来”并不一定意味着中世纪研究的下一步,而是以中世纪的思想重塑我们的未来。中世纪文本可以为直接行动、社会正义以及社会自由主义、反资本主义、反中央集权运动提供信息和新方法。为此,我主张将中世纪文学文本去语境化,这样它们的激进可能性就可以为我们自己的空间和运动提供信息,特别是在社会正义、异议和抗议方面。通过文本去语境化,我的意思是将文学文本从它的时间和区域政治背景中移除,以便让文本反映出适用于我们当前和未来政治环境的激进可能性。通过当代激进政治的视角来阅读中世纪晚期的英文文本《Ywain and Gawain》,我们可以看到中世纪的文学作品是如何帮助我们更好地理解并最终改变我们自己的政治现实的。占领实际空间一直是并将继续是一种久经考验的反对压迫性权力结构的手段。在许多情况下,人们走上街头,居住在具有象征意义的特定地方,以使他们的异议可见。虽然空间的一般构成看起来是静态的和不变的,但重新定义空间允许对现状的抵抗。诸如吉尔·德勒兹和菲利克斯·瓜塔里、亨利·列斐弗尔、爱德华·索亚和大卫·哈维等理论家讨论了社会空间(即公共广场、建筑、房间等)通过使用和社会欲望而发生变化的方式。空间是可塑的;它从来没有固定的用法或含义。列斐伏尔对这一观点提出了更好的观点:“空间不能仅仅被视为这些机构和社会的先天条件