LEGAL PROTECTION OF INDIGENOUS INSTITUTIONS IN THE FRAME OF THE RULE OF LAW (PERSPECTIVE OF LEGAL PROTECTION THEORY)

Cepalo Pub Date : 2023-03-27 DOI:10.25041/cepalo.v7no1.2898
Safrin Salam
{"title":"LEGAL PROTECTION OF INDIGENOUS INSTITUTIONS IN THE FRAME OF THE RULE OF LAW (PERSPECTIVE OF LEGAL PROTECTION THEORY)","authors":"Safrin Salam","doi":"10.25041/cepalo.v7no1.2898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indigenous institutions in Indonesia are a local wisdom inherited from the ancestors of the Indonesian State. This research is normative legal research, namely legal research conducted by researching and examining statutory regulations, starting from Article 18b paragraph 2 of the 1945 Constitution, 18B paragraph (2), Article 28D paragraph (1), Article 28G paragraph (1), and Article 28I paragraph (3), and the organic regulations under them. The results of the study show that the arrangements for protecting traditional institutions in Indonesia, namely that the State is obliged to protect the natural rights of humans themselves, namely customary law communities, are based on the Decision of the constitutional court no. 35/puu/ix/2012, namely customary rights in both private law and public law. John Locke's theory of protection is related to regulations issued by the State to provide legal protection for rechtgemeschappen, which needs to be studied juridically and sociologically. While the harmonization of customary institutional protection norms in Indonesia, namely by carrying out a legal review (reviewing) of legal regulations against Permendagri with Article 18b, Paragraph 2 of the 1945 Constitution, Article 6 of Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning human rights, Constitutional Court Decision Number 35/puu-ix/2012 Permendagri Number 52 of 2014 concerning the recognition and protection of customary law communities, and Circular Letter Number 3/se/iv/2014 regarding the determination of the existence of customary law communities and ulayat lands.","PeriodicalId":52705,"journal":{"name":"Cepalo","volume":"203 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cepalo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v7no1.2898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indigenous institutions in Indonesia are a local wisdom inherited from the ancestors of the Indonesian State. This research is normative legal research, namely legal research conducted by researching and examining statutory regulations, starting from Article 18b paragraph 2 of the 1945 Constitution, 18B paragraph (2), Article 28D paragraph (1), Article 28G paragraph (1), and Article 28I paragraph (3), and the organic regulations under them. The results of the study show that the arrangements for protecting traditional institutions in Indonesia, namely that the State is obliged to protect the natural rights of humans themselves, namely customary law communities, are based on the Decision of the constitutional court no. 35/puu/ix/2012, namely customary rights in both private law and public law. John Locke's theory of protection is related to regulations issued by the State to provide legal protection for rechtgemeschappen, which needs to be studied juridically and sociologically. While the harmonization of customary institutional protection norms in Indonesia, namely by carrying out a legal review (reviewing) of legal regulations against Permendagri with Article 18b, Paragraph 2 of the 1945 Constitution, Article 6 of Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning human rights, Constitutional Court Decision Number 35/puu-ix/2012 Permendagri Number 52 of 2014 concerning the recognition and protection of customary law communities, and Circular Letter Number 3/se/iv/2014 regarding the determination of the existence of customary law communities and ulayat lands.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法治框架下的本土机构法律保护(法律保护理论视角)
印度尼西亚的土著机构是从印度尼西亚国家祖先那里继承下来的一种地方智慧。本研究是规范性法律研究,即从1945年宪法第18b条第2款、18b条第2款、第28D条第1款、第28G条第1款、第28I条第3款及其下的组织法开始,通过研究和审查成文法进行的法律研究。研究结果表明,保护印度尼西亚传统制度的安排,即国家有义务保护人本身的自然权利,即习惯法社区,是根据宪法法院第18号决定作出的。35/puu/ix/2012,即私法和公法中的习惯权利。约翰·洛克的保护理论涉及到国家颁布法规为犯罪嫌疑人提供法律保护,这需要从法学和社会学的角度进行研究。协调印度尼西亚的习惯制度保护规范,即对针对Permendagri的法律法规进行法律审查(审查),其中包括1945年《宪法》第18b条第2款、1999年关于人权的第39号法律第6条、宪法法院关于承认和保护习惯法社区的第35/puu-ix/2012号决定(2014年Permendagri第52号决定),以及关于确定习惯法社区和乌拉亚特土地是否存在的第3/se/iv/2014号通函。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
RESOLVING THE PROBLEMATIC ARRANGEMENT OF THE TRIUMVIRATE AS INTERIM PRESIDENT IN INDONESIA: INSIGHTS FROM GABON AND AUSTRIA APPLICATION OF FAST-TRACK LEGISLATION METHOD IN PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT IN INDONESIA POLICY AND LINGUISTIC CONSIDERATIONS IN THE PROPOSED RENAMING OF WEST JAVA PROVINCE TO TATAR SUNDA HARMONIZING INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL LEGAL SYSTEMS THROUGH THE PRINCIPLES OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE MODERN STATE PROGRESSIVE STEPS FOR PREVENTING AND HANDLING MONEY POLITICS IN INDONESIAN ELECTIONS: AN EFFORT TO REDUCE DEVIANT BEHAVIOR IN DEMOCRATIC ELECTIONS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1