A Comparative Analysis of the Occurrence of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections Caused by Respiratory Syncytial Virus among Newborns in the Years before and during Covid-19 Pandemic at a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Slovenia

Sandra Cerar, Vesna Pirnovar
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of the Occurrence of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections Caused by Respiratory Syncytial Virus among Newborns in the Years before and during Covid-19 Pandemic at a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Slovenia","authors":"Sandra Cerar, Vesna Pirnovar","doi":"10.5457/p2005-114.322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective − In this study we aimed to compare the occurrence of lower respiratory tract infections caused by respiratory syncytial virus in the neonatal population in the years before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods − Cases of newborns, hospitalized due to viral lower respiratory tract infection from 2015 to 2020, were analyzed retrospectively, and compared according to cause (respiratory syncytial virus, non-respiratory syncytial virus) and treatment requirements before (2015−2019) and after (2020) the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.Results − The number of newborns with lower respiratory tract infections and newborns contracting respiratory syncytial virus declined significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Respiratory syncytial virus was the major causative agent before the pandemic, while after the lockdown no more cases were reported. There were no significant differences between the two periods regarding the number of patients requiring treatment with oxygen (P=0.705), non-invasive (P=0.842) and invasive ventilation (P=0.574), or in terms of median hospital stay (P=0.670) and the duration of non-invasive (P=0.350) and invasive ventilation (P=0.556), while the difference in the duration of treatment with oxygen was statistically significant (P=0.048).Conclusions − A decline was found in the number of newborns hospitalized due to respiratory syncytial virus and non-respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract infections during the COVID-19. Our results strongly suggest that social distancing and other lockdown strategies were effective in slowing down the spread of respiratory syncytial virus and decreasing the need for hospitalization among newborns, but may be not equally effective for all agents causing lower respiratory tract infections.","PeriodicalId":36516,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Paediatrics","volume":"9 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Paediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5457/p2005-114.322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective − In this study we aimed to compare the occurrence of lower respiratory tract infections caused by respiratory syncytial virus in the neonatal population in the years before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods − Cases of newborns, hospitalized due to viral lower respiratory tract infection from 2015 to 2020, were analyzed retrospectively, and compared according to cause (respiratory syncytial virus, non-respiratory syncytial virus) and treatment requirements before (2015−2019) and after (2020) the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.Results − The number of newborns with lower respiratory tract infections and newborns contracting respiratory syncytial virus declined significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Respiratory syncytial virus was the major causative agent before the pandemic, while after the lockdown no more cases were reported. There were no significant differences between the two periods regarding the number of patients requiring treatment with oxygen (P=0.705), non-invasive (P=0.842) and invasive ventilation (P=0.574), or in terms of median hospital stay (P=0.670) and the duration of non-invasive (P=0.350) and invasive ventilation (P=0.556), while the difference in the duration of treatment with oxygen was statistically significant (P=0.048).Conclusions − A decline was found in the number of newborns hospitalized due to respiratory syncytial virus and non-respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract infections during the COVID-19. Our results strongly suggest that social distancing and other lockdown strategies were effective in slowing down the spread of respiratory syncytial virus and decreasing the need for hospitalization among newborns, but may be not equally effective for all agents causing lower respiratory tract infections.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯洛文尼亚一家三级转诊医院2019冠状病毒病大流行前后新生儿呼吸道合胞病毒下呼吸道感染发生率的比较分析
目的:本研究旨在比较COVID-19大流行前和期间新生儿中呼吸道合胞病毒引起的下呼吸道感染的发生率。方法回顾性分析2015 - 2020年因病毒性下呼吸道感染住院的新生儿病例,并对2015 - 2019年和2020年COVID-19大流行爆发前后的病因(呼吸道合胞病毒、非呼吸道合胞病毒)和治疗要求进行比较。结果:新冠肺炎大流行期间,新生儿下呼吸道感染和呼吸道合胞病毒感染人数明显下降。大流行前呼吸道合胞病毒是主要病原体,封城后无新增病例报告。两期患者需要吸氧治疗的人数(P=0.705)、无创(P=0.842)、有创通气(P=0.574)、住院时间中位数(P=0.670)、无创(P=0.350)、有创通气时间(P=0.556)差异均无统计学意义,吸氧治疗时间差异有统计学意义(P=0.048)。−新冠肺炎期间,呼吸道合胞病毒和非呼吸道合胞病毒下呼吸道感染导致的新生儿住院人数有所下降。我们的研究结果强烈表明,社交距离和其他封锁策略在减缓呼吸道合胞病毒的传播和减少新生儿住院需求方面是有效的,但可能不是对所有引起下呼吸道感染的病原体都同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Paediatrics
Central European Journal of Paediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Knowledge and Attitudes toward Vaccination in Croatian Adolescents, the Influence of the Internet Foreign Body in the Main Bronchus: Radiological Signs, Complications, and Differential Diagnosis PEER REVIEWERS FOR THE CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS VOL. 19. A Miraculous Rescue of Two Siblings from the Earthquake Rubble in Türkiye Assessment of Physical Condition in Cystic Fibrosis Patients during 12-month Treatment with Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Modulators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1