Universal Optimizations of Scoring Functions for Virtual Screening

IF 0.4 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Chem-Bio Informatics Journal Pub Date : 2010-01-01 DOI:10.1273/CBIJ.10.85
K. Onodera, S. Kamijo
{"title":"Universal Optimizations of Scoring Functions for Virtual Screening","authors":"K. Onodera, S. Kamijo","doi":"10.1273/CBIJ.10.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Structure-based virtual screening is gaining popularity in drug discovery. A number of molecular docking programs and scoring functions have been developed in the community, but they had not fulfilled the demands for the improved accuracy, yet. In order to improve the accuracy, the consensus scoring method has been developed. It combines docking scores from various scoring functions without considering characteristics of the docking scores. In this study, we adopted the concepts of the consensus scoring, and improved the docking score from each docking programs, DOCK, FRED or GOLD, for virtual screening. Instead using simple sum of score components in those docking scores, weight factors of the score components were introduced and adjusted for better predictions of active ligands during virtual screening. Several optimization processes were tested to find the best optimization methods of the docking scores using a wide variety of 113 target proteins with over 2000 diverse decoys. Finally, the optimizations improved the chance to discover the active ligands by up to 52.4% (e.g. from 36.8% to 56.1% using GOLD) for the test set. Additionally, the combination of the optimized scores using GOLD and FRED improved success rate in the test set by 77.2%, and approximately 70% of ligands for target proteins were predictable in the test set with 20 times enrichment.","PeriodicalId":40659,"journal":{"name":"Chem-Bio Informatics Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chem-Bio Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1273/CBIJ.10.85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Structure-based virtual screening is gaining popularity in drug discovery. A number of molecular docking programs and scoring functions have been developed in the community, but they had not fulfilled the demands for the improved accuracy, yet. In order to improve the accuracy, the consensus scoring method has been developed. It combines docking scores from various scoring functions without considering characteristics of the docking scores. In this study, we adopted the concepts of the consensus scoring, and improved the docking score from each docking programs, DOCK, FRED or GOLD, for virtual screening. Instead using simple sum of score components in those docking scores, weight factors of the score components were introduced and adjusted for better predictions of active ligands during virtual screening. Several optimization processes were tested to find the best optimization methods of the docking scores using a wide variety of 113 target proteins with over 2000 diverse decoys. Finally, the optimizations improved the chance to discover the active ligands by up to 52.4% (e.g. from 36.8% to 56.1% using GOLD) for the test set. Additionally, the combination of the optimized scores using GOLD and FRED improved success rate in the test set by 77.2%, and approximately 70% of ligands for target proteins were predictable in the test set with 20 times enrichment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟筛选评分功能的通用优化
基于结构的虚拟筛选在药物发现中越来越受欢迎。目前社会上已经开发了一些分子对接程序和评分功能,但还不能满足提高精度的要求。为了提高准确率,提出了共识评分法。在不考虑对接分数特点的情况下,综合了各种评分函数的对接分数。在本研究中,我们采用了共识评分的概念,并改进了每个对接方案的对接评分,DOCK, FRED或GOLD,用于虚拟筛选。在这些对接分数中使用简单的分数分量之和,而不是引入和调整分数分量的权重因子,以便在虚拟筛选过程中更好地预测活性配体。利用113种不同的靶蛋白和2000多种不同的诱饵,对几种优化过程进行了测试,以找到对接分数的最佳优化方法。最后,对于测试集,优化将发现活性配体的机会提高了52.4%(例如,使用GOLD从36.8%提高到56.1%)。此外,使用GOLD和FRED优化得分的组合将测试集的成功率提高了77.2%,并且在富集20倍的测试集中,大约70%的靶蛋白配体是可预测的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chem-Bio Informatics Journal
Chem-Bio Informatics Journal BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Structural Stability and Binding Ability of SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease with GC376: A Stereoisomeric Covalent Ligand Analysis by FMO calculation Enzyme Kinetics Based on the Concept of Flux Enzyme Kinetics Based on the Concept of Flux Application of Model Core Potentials to Zn- and Mg-containing Metalloproteins in the Fragment Molecular Orbital Method How Beneficial or Threatening is Artificial Intelligence?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1