The Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Antibiotic Use in Bone Fracture Patients in a Public Hospital in Indonesia

Wanudya Atmajani, D. Hasmono, Wien Maryati Awdisma, Erwien Isparnadi, Dewi Ramdani
{"title":"The Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Antibiotic Use in Bone Fracture Patients in a Public Hospital in Indonesia","authors":"Wanudya Atmajani, D. Hasmono, Wien Maryati Awdisma, Erwien Isparnadi, Dewi Ramdani","doi":"10.21776/ub.pji.2022.008.01.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Prophylactic antibiotic therapy has an important role in facilitating optimal postoperative healing. Inappropriate use of antibiotics in hospitals will increase the cost of therapy and the incidence of nosocomial infections of infectious microorganisms. Preoperative prophylactic antibiotics are believed to reduce the incidence of surgical site infections. Objective: This study aims to determine the pattern of antibiotic use and analyse the use of antibiotics qualitatively by the Gyssen method and quantitatively by the defined daily dose (DDD) method in inpatients with bone fractures at the Haji General Hospital Surabaya, Indonesia. Methods: This study was a descriptive observational study conducted on 89 samples. Data were collected retrospectively through medical records in the period January-December 2019. Antibiotic use data were then analysed qualitatively and quantitatively using the Gyssen and DDD methods. Results: In this study, the antibiotic that was widely used as a prophylactic and therapeutic antibiotic in patients with bone fractures was ceftriaxone. Quantitative analysis using the DDD method showed that the value of ceftriaxone was 45.6/100 patient-days and cefazoline was 3.1/100 patient-days. Analysis of antibiotic use in bone fracture patients using the Gyssen method showed that the rational use of antibiotics was 84.3%, the use of antibiotics was not timely as much as 4.5%, and the interval of antibiotic administration was not appropriate as much as 11.2%. Conclusion: the use of antibiotics in fracture surgery patients is classified as rational use of antibiotics but the use of antibiotics still exceeds WHO standards. Furthermore, it is necessary to conduct a similar study with prospective data collection so that it can observe the incidence of surgical wound infection.","PeriodicalId":19897,"journal":{"name":"PHARMACY: Jurnal Farmasi Indonesia (Pharmaceutical Journal of Indonesia)","volume":"26 1-2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHARMACY: Jurnal Farmasi Indonesia (Pharmaceutical Journal of Indonesia)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.pji.2022.008.01.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Prophylactic antibiotic therapy has an important role in facilitating optimal postoperative healing. Inappropriate use of antibiotics in hospitals will increase the cost of therapy and the incidence of nosocomial infections of infectious microorganisms. Preoperative prophylactic antibiotics are believed to reduce the incidence of surgical site infections. Objective: This study aims to determine the pattern of antibiotic use and analyse the use of antibiotics qualitatively by the Gyssen method and quantitatively by the defined daily dose (DDD) method in inpatients with bone fractures at the Haji General Hospital Surabaya, Indonesia. Methods: This study was a descriptive observational study conducted on 89 samples. Data were collected retrospectively through medical records in the period January-December 2019. Antibiotic use data were then analysed qualitatively and quantitatively using the Gyssen and DDD methods. Results: In this study, the antibiotic that was widely used as a prophylactic and therapeutic antibiotic in patients with bone fractures was ceftriaxone. Quantitative analysis using the DDD method showed that the value of ceftriaxone was 45.6/100 patient-days and cefazoline was 3.1/100 patient-days. Analysis of antibiotic use in bone fracture patients using the Gyssen method showed that the rational use of antibiotics was 84.3%, the use of antibiotics was not timely as much as 4.5%, and the interval of antibiotic administration was not appropriate as much as 11.2%. Conclusion: the use of antibiotics in fracture surgery patients is classified as rational use of antibiotics but the use of antibiotics still exceeds WHO standards. Furthermore, it is necessary to conduct a similar study with prospective data collection so that it can observe the incidence of surgical wound infection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚某公立医院骨折患者抗生素使用的定量与定性分析
导言:预防性抗生素治疗对促进术后最佳愈合具有重要作用。医院不当使用抗生素会增加治疗费用和感染性微生物院内感染的发生率。术前预防性抗生素被认为可以减少手术部位感染的发生率。目的:本研究旨在确定抗生素的使用模式,并通过Gyssen法定性分析和限定日剂量(DDD)法定量分析印度尼西亚泗水哈吉总医院住院骨折患者的抗生素使用情况。方法:本研究采用描述性观察研究,共89例样本。通过2019年1月至12月期间的医疗记录回顾性收集数据。然后使用Gyssen和DDD方法对抗生素使用数据进行定性和定量分析。结果:在本研究中,头孢曲松是骨折患者广泛使用的预防性和治疗性抗生素。DDD法定量分析头孢曲松为45.6/100患者-天,头孢唑啉为3.1/100患者-天。采用Gyssen法对骨折患者抗生素使用情况进行分析,抗菌药物合理使用率为84.3%,抗菌药物使用不及时率达4.5%,抗菌药物给药间隔不适当率达11.2%。结论:骨折手术患者抗菌药物的使用属于合理使用抗菌药物,但抗菌药物的使用仍超过WHO标准。此外,有必要进行类似的前瞻性数据收集研究,以观察手术伤口感染的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost Analysis of Telepharmacy Programs for Diabetes Mellitus Patients at Pharmacy Uji Efektivitas Sedatif-Hipnotik Ekstrak Daun Keji Beling (Strobilanthes crispa Blume) terhadap Mencit Putih Jantan Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai) Exocarp Extract Effectivity Against Blood Uric Acid Levels in Male Mice (Mus musculus) Antigenotoxic Potential of Dayak Onion Bulb and Leaf (Eleutherine bulbosa Urb.) Ethanol Extract with Allium cepa Assay Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Responden Terhadap Kualitas Pemberian Informasi Obat Di UPT Puskesmas Bengkalis Kecamatan Bengkalis Provinsi Riau
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1