Establishing Expectations: Exploring Session Limits in University Counseling Centers

IF 1.9 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED JOURNAL OF COLLEGE STUDENT PSYCHOTHERAPY Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.1080/87568225.2019.1650680
Jeremy J. Coleman, Joanna M Drinane, Jesse Owen, S. M. Kopta
{"title":"Establishing Expectations: Exploring Session Limits in University Counseling Centers","authors":"Jeremy J. Coleman, Joanna M Drinane, Jesse Owen, S. M. Kopta","doi":"10.1080/87568225.2019.1650680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT University counseling centers (UCCs) are tasked with delivering effective mental health interventions amidst increasing enrollment and declining resources. A growing number of UCCs have implemented session limits to meet demand with limited resources. To further understand the impact of this trend, we examined data obtained from a nationwide sample of 15,802 clients seeking treatment from 580 therapists at 32 UCCs utilizing the Behavioral Health Measure-20 (BHM-20). We compared psychotherapy outcomes to the number of clinical staff at UCCs utilizing either explicitly defined session limits or ambiguously defined session limits. There was a significant interaction between the way the sample of UCCs defined annual session limits, number of staff, and therapy outcomes. Specifically, higher therapy outcomes were observed at UCCs with explicitly defined session limits and fewer available staff. The ratio of enrolled students to clinical staff was not a predictor of outcome. Implications for clinical practice and agency session limits policy are discussed.","PeriodicalId":45816,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF COLLEGE STUDENT PSYCHOTHERAPY","volume":"19 12","pages":"103 - 117"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF COLLEGE STUDENT PSYCHOTHERAPY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/87568225.2019.1650680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT University counseling centers (UCCs) are tasked with delivering effective mental health interventions amidst increasing enrollment and declining resources. A growing number of UCCs have implemented session limits to meet demand with limited resources. To further understand the impact of this trend, we examined data obtained from a nationwide sample of 15,802 clients seeking treatment from 580 therapists at 32 UCCs utilizing the Behavioral Health Measure-20 (BHM-20). We compared psychotherapy outcomes to the number of clinical staff at UCCs utilizing either explicitly defined session limits or ambiguously defined session limits. There was a significant interaction between the way the sample of UCCs defined annual session limits, number of staff, and therapy outcomes. Specifically, higher therapy outcomes were observed at UCCs with explicitly defined session limits and fewer available staff. The ratio of enrolled students to clinical staff was not a predictor of outcome. Implications for clinical practice and agency session limits policy are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立期望:探索大学心理咨询中心的会话限制
大学心理咨询中心(UCCs)的任务是在招生人数增加和资源减少的情况下提供有效的心理健康干预措施。越来越多的ucc实施了会话限制,以满足有限资源的需求。为了进一步了解这一趋势的影响,我们使用行为健康测量-20 (BHM-20)检查了从全国32个UCCs的580名治疗师那里寻求治疗的15,802名客户样本的数据。我们将心理治疗的结果与UCCs临床工作人员的数量进行了比较,这些临床工作人员使用明确定义的会话限制或模糊定义的会话限制。UCCs样本定义年度会期限制的方式、工作人员数量和治疗结果之间存在显著的相互作用。具体来说,在有明确定义的疗程限制和较少可用人员的UCCs中观察到更高的治疗结果。注册学生与临床工作人员的比例并不是结果的预测因子。对临床实践和机构会议限制政策的影响进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Journal of College Student Psychotherapy® is dedicated to enhancing the lives of college and university students by featuring high-quality articles about practice, theory, and research in mental health and personal development. Contributions to the journal come from professionals in the field of mental health and counseling and from college staff, faculty, and students. The journal is written specifically for college and university administrative staff and faculty as well as counselors and mental health professionals. Regular quarterly issues of the journal feature articles of central interest to psychotherapists and counselors while also expressing broader implications for everyone who wishes to understand students.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Load Index (CLI): Design, Development, and Review of Research Promoting a Culture of Care for College Students with Marginalized Identities Using an Embedded Prevention Navigation Model Barriers to and Benefits of Mental Health Services in College Students with and without Depression, Anxiety, and Hazardous Alcohol Use The Evolving Nature of Threat and Violence Risk Assessment in College Counseling Centers The Muslim Mental Health Initiative: An Overview and Steps for Development and Implementation on American College Campuses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1