The question of progressive agency

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY SOUNDINGS Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI:10.3898/soun.72.03.2019
M. Rustin
{"title":"The question of progressive agency","authors":"M. Rustin","doi":"10.3898/soun.72.03.2019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article revisits debates about agency: what and where are the forces and agents that might bring about change? In the past liberals and socialists broadly shared a belief in social enlightenment and progress, but liberals believed that this could be achieved gradually, through\n education, while Marxists believed that self-organisation by the working class was the way forward. A third, more recent, approach argues that changes in information technology are making it possible for society to shift from hierarchical to lateral patterns of connection. These three different\n approaches to agency are critically discussed. Among the thinkers discussed are Karl Marx, Raymond Williams, Eric Hobsbawm, Robin Murray, Manuel Castells, Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri. The rethinking and renewal of institutions that modern societies now need calls for deep engagement with\n these issues, and both 'new' and 'old' conceptions of agency are relevant to this task. Part of the critical terms series","PeriodicalId":45378,"journal":{"name":"SOUNDINGS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOUNDINGS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3898/soun.72.03.2019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article revisits debates about agency: what and where are the forces and agents that might bring about change? In the past liberals and socialists broadly shared a belief in social enlightenment and progress, but liberals believed that this could be achieved gradually, through education, while Marxists believed that self-organisation by the working class was the way forward. A third, more recent, approach argues that changes in information technology are making it possible for society to shift from hierarchical to lateral patterns of connection. These three different approaches to agency are critically discussed. Among the thinkers discussed are Karl Marx, Raymond Williams, Eric Hobsbawm, Robin Murray, Manuel Castells, Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri. The rethinking and renewal of institutions that modern societies now need calls for deep engagement with these issues, and both 'new' and 'old' conceptions of agency are relevant to this task. Part of the critical terms series
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
进步代理的问题
本文回顾了关于能动性的争论:可能带来变革的力量和动因是什么,在哪里?过去,自由主义者和社会主义者普遍相信社会启蒙和社会进步,但自由主义者认为这可以通过教育逐步实现,而马克思主义者则认为工人阶级的自我组织是前进的道路。最近的第三种方法认为,信息技术的变化使社会有可能从等级连接模式转变为横向连接模式。对这三种不同的代理方法进行了批判性的讨论。讨论的思想家包括卡尔·马克思、雷蒙德·威廉姆斯、埃里克·霍布斯鲍姆、罗宾·穆雷、曼纽尔·卡斯特、迈克尔·哈特和安东尼奥·内格里。现代社会现在需要对制度进行重新思考和更新,这要求我们深入参与这些问题,而代理的“新”和“旧”概念都与这项任务有关。关键项系列的一部分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SOUNDINGS
SOUNDINGS HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Eurocommunism: when the past and present of the European left meet Emergency thinking Law and order: what can we expect from an incoming Labour government? Urban communist politics of the everyday in Graz, Austria Eurocommunism: The rise and fall of a hopeful project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1