New Data on Jaani Stone Graves at Vao, Northern Estonia/Uusi Andmeid Vao Jaani Kivikalmetest

IF 0.9 1区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Estonian Journal of Archaeology Pub Date : 2015-12-01 DOI:10.3176/arch.2015.2.02
M. Laneman, V. Lang, M. Malve, Eve Rannamae
{"title":"New Data on Jaani Stone Graves at Vao, Northern Estonia/Uusi Andmeid Vao Jaani Kivikalmetest","authors":"M. Laneman, V. Lang, M. Malve, Eve Rannamae","doi":"10.3176/arch.2015.2.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction In 1982, one of the authors of this paper excavated three conjoined stone graves on the bleak alvar at Jaani farm in Vao village (Lang 1983b; 1996, 134 ff.). These were the last of the numerous stone graves around the hill site at Iru and the lower reaches of the Pirita River (Fig. 1) that were rescue excavated due to vibrant economic development on the doorstep of the capital city Tallinn. The majority of the graves in the area had been rescue excavated in the 1970s and in 1980 (Lougas 1975; 1976; 1981; Jaanits & Lavi 1978; Deemant 1993; see also Howen 1900; Spreckelsen 1907; 1927; Vassar 1936). [FIGURE 1 OMITTED] Now, more than thirty years later, we scrutinized the site's osteological assemblage and ordered radiocarbon dating for a selection of human bones. The study was undertaken as part of a radiocarbon dating programme for stone-cist graves in Estonia (see Laneman 2012; Laneman & Lang 2013). In the current paper we publish the results of this investigation, adhering to a rather plain form of describing and discussing different elements of a single site (grave structure, human and faunal remains, artefacts, etc.). In an ideal world, most of this information, particularly osteological analysis, would have been available shortly after the excavation. In the real world, however, one has to deal with the remarkable paucity of properly excavated, osteologically analysed and (radiocarbon-)dated grave sites. Filling in essential gaps and re-interpreting the record--which is what we do in this paper--is thus a necessary and unavoidable part of archaeological practice. Furthermore, it is only detailed information on single sites that provides the basis for a broader and deeper insight of the past in general. Discussion of the Jaani graves in their wider context, however, is the subject of a separate study. Structure of the site The site under review comprised a ship-shaped stone grave, a stone-cist grave (B), and half of another stone-cist grave (A) fitted tightly between them (Fig. 2). This is a rather unusual arrangement, since stone-cist graves usually occur as clearly defined separate structures, and ship graves are altogether rare in the eastern Baltic region. The ship at Vao is one of the three stone ship graves currently known in the territory of Estonia; the remaining two were excavated at Lulle, Sorve Peninsula, Saaremaa (Lougas 1970; Lang 2007a, 164 ff.). [FIGURE 2 OMITTED] The roughly 10.5 m long ship-shaped grave in the eastern part of the structure was edged with large granite stones, which in places were situated in two adjacent rows. It was not possible to definitively establish whether this was the original arrangement of the stones or if they had initially been placed on top of each other; in any case it seems that there has been no top wall of limestone slabs (unlike with the other graves). The gunwale line was partially destroyed, and thus revealed no indications as to which end of the ship was the stern and which was the stem (cf. Lang 1983b; 1996, 135). The cist, also of granite boulders, was preserved only partially, but its original dimensions may have been ca 60 x 50 x 40 cm. The space between the gunwales was filled with limestone, except for the surroundings of the cist where relatively small sparsely situated granite stones were found. The limestone fill included slabs collapsed from the ring wall of grave A, and stones from a later field clearance above them. The thickness of the original limestone fill was therefore difficult to determine, but it was estimated to have been approximately a couple of dozen centimetres, so that the fill did not reach the tops of the framing granite stones. The stone-cist graves were bordered by two-layer ring-walls with a foundation of granite stones (which in at least grave A were placed in two adjacent rows) and a top wall of limestone slabs; the limestone walls, however, were fully disintegrated. …","PeriodicalId":42767,"journal":{"name":"Estonian Journal of Archaeology","volume":"36 3","pages":"110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estonian Journal of Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3176/arch.2015.2.02","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Introduction In 1982, one of the authors of this paper excavated three conjoined stone graves on the bleak alvar at Jaani farm in Vao village (Lang 1983b; 1996, 134 ff.). These were the last of the numerous stone graves around the hill site at Iru and the lower reaches of the Pirita River (Fig. 1) that were rescue excavated due to vibrant economic development on the doorstep of the capital city Tallinn. The majority of the graves in the area had been rescue excavated in the 1970s and in 1980 (Lougas 1975; 1976; 1981; Jaanits & Lavi 1978; Deemant 1993; see also Howen 1900; Spreckelsen 1907; 1927; Vassar 1936). [FIGURE 1 OMITTED] Now, more than thirty years later, we scrutinized the site's osteological assemblage and ordered radiocarbon dating for a selection of human bones. The study was undertaken as part of a radiocarbon dating programme for stone-cist graves in Estonia (see Laneman 2012; Laneman & Lang 2013). In the current paper we publish the results of this investigation, adhering to a rather plain form of describing and discussing different elements of a single site (grave structure, human and faunal remains, artefacts, etc.). In an ideal world, most of this information, particularly osteological analysis, would have been available shortly after the excavation. In the real world, however, one has to deal with the remarkable paucity of properly excavated, osteologically analysed and (radiocarbon-)dated grave sites. Filling in essential gaps and re-interpreting the record--which is what we do in this paper--is thus a necessary and unavoidable part of archaeological practice. Furthermore, it is only detailed information on single sites that provides the basis for a broader and deeper insight of the past in general. Discussion of the Jaani graves in their wider context, however, is the subject of a separate study. Structure of the site The site under review comprised a ship-shaped stone grave, a stone-cist grave (B), and half of another stone-cist grave (A) fitted tightly between them (Fig. 2). This is a rather unusual arrangement, since stone-cist graves usually occur as clearly defined separate structures, and ship graves are altogether rare in the eastern Baltic region. The ship at Vao is one of the three stone ship graves currently known in the territory of Estonia; the remaining two were excavated at Lulle, Sorve Peninsula, Saaremaa (Lougas 1970; Lang 2007a, 164 ff.). [FIGURE 2 OMITTED] The roughly 10.5 m long ship-shaped grave in the eastern part of the structure was edged with large granite stones, which in places were situated in two adjacent rows. It was not possible to definitively establish whether this was the original arrangement of the stones or if they had initially been placed on top of each other; in any case it seems that there has been no top wall of limestone slabs (unlike with the other graves). The gunwale line was partially destroyed, and thus revealed no indications as to which end of the ship was the stern and which was the stem (cf. Lang 1983b; 1996, 135). The cist, also of granite boulders, was preserved only partially, but its original dimensions may have been ca 60 x 50 x 40 cm. The space between the gunwales was filled with limestone, except for the surroundings of the cist where relatively small sparsely situated granite stones were found. The limestone fill included slabs collapsed from the ring wall of grave A, and stones from a later field clearance above them. The thickness of the original limestone fill was therefore difficult to determine, but it was estimated to have been approximately a couple of dozen centimetres, so that the fill did not reach the tops of the framing granite stones. The stone-cist graves were bordered by two-layer ring-walls with a foundation of granite stones (which in at least grave A were placed in two adjacent rows) and a top wall of limestone slabs; the limestone walls, however, were fully disintegrated. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1982年,本文作者之一在Vao村Jaani农场荒凉的阿尔瓦上发掘了三个连体石墓(Lang 1983b;1996, 134 ff.)。由于首都塔林附近的经济蓬勃发展,这些是伊鲁和皮里塔河下游附近众多石墓中的最后一批(图1)。该地区的大多数坟墓都是在20世纪70年代和80年代抢救挖掘出来的(Lougas 1975;1976;1981;Jaanits & Lavi 1978;Deemant 1993;参见Howen 1900;Spreckelsen 1907;1927;瓦萨尔1936)。现在,三十多年过去了,我们仔细检查了该遗址的骨学组合,并对一些精选的人类骨骼进行了放射性碳定年。这项研究是爱沙尼亚石质坟墓放射性碳定年方案的一部分(见Laneman 2012;Laneman & Lang 2013)。在当前的论文中,我们发表了这项调查的结果,坚持以一种相当简单的形式描述和讨论单个遗址的不同元素(坟墓结构,人类和动物遗骸,人工制品等)。在一个理想的世界里,这些信息,尤其是骨学分析,应该在挖掘后不久就能得到。然而,在现实世界中,人们不得不面对的问题是,适当挖掘、骨学分析和(放射性碳)定年的坟墓遗址非常少。因此,填补重要的空白和重新解释记录——这就是我们在本文中所做的——是考古实践中必要和不可避免的一部分。此外,只有个别地点的详细资料才能为更广泛和更深入地了解过去提供基础。然而,在更广泛的背景下讨论贾尼坟墓是另一项研究的主题。该遗址包括一个船形石墓、一个石池墓(B)和另一个石池墓(a)的一半,它们紧密地连接在一起(图2)。这是一个相当不寻常的安排,因为石池墓通常是作为明确定义的独立结构出现的,而船墓在波罗的海东部地区是非常罕见的。Vao的船是目前在爱沙尼亚境内已知的三个石船墓之一;其余两件出土于萨雷马索尔夫半岛的卢勒(Lougas, 1970;Lang 2007a, 164 ff.)。[图2省略]该结构东部约10.5米长的船形坟墓边缘有大型花岗岩,这些花岗岩在某些地方相邻两排。人们无法确定这是石头的原始排列,还是它们最初是被放在一起的;无论如何,似乎没有石灰石板的顶墙(与其他坟墓不同)。舷线部分被摧毁,因此没有迹象表明船的哪一端是船尾,哪一端是船尾(cf. Lang 1983b;1996年,135年)。同样由花岗岩巨石组成的岩礁只保存了一部分,但其原始尺寸可能约为60 x 50 x 40厘米。除了在礁滩周围发现了相对小而稀疏的花岗岩外,舷缝之间的空间被石灰石填满。石灰石填充物包括从坟墓A的环形墙上坍塌下来的石板,以及后来在它们上面的田野空地上的石头。因此,最初的石灰石填充物的厚度很难确定,但据估计大约有几十厘米,因此填充物没有达到框架花岗岩的顶部。石缸坟墓的边缘是两层环形墙,以花岗岩石头为基础(至少在坟墓a中是相邻的两排),顶墙是石灰石板;然而,石灰岩的墙壁已经完全瓦解了。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
50.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Wrecked trade – a medieval ship in the Gulf of Finland Stone Age imitation of a slotted bone point from Pärnu River (south-western Estonia) A ‘Roman Brass’ Age: a transformation in copper-alloy composition in Estonia and northern Latvia during the Roman Iron Age, identified by pXRF JÄGALA JÕESUU V STONE AGE SETTLEMENT SITE IN NORTHERN ESTONIA: SPATIAL AND CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS OF FINDS The age of the stone-cist graves at the lower reaches of the Pirita River reconsidered: analysis of the radiocarbon data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1