Assessment of the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in Female Patients With Hypothyroidism.

Narges Karimi, Ozra Akha, Javad Rezaiefard
{"title":"Assessment of the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in Female Patients With Hypothyroidism.","authors":"Narges Karimi, Ozra Akha, Javad Rezaiefard","doi":"10.32598/bcn.2022.3578.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy. There are several factors that influence the severity of CTS. The purpose of this study was to explore the severity of CTS in hypothyroid patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted in the university clinic. Seventy-six participants with a clinically and electrophysiological confirmed diagnosis of CTS were included in the study. The demographic data and severity of CTS were analyzed based on the presence (n=38) or the absence (n=38) of primary hypothyroid disease. Thirty-eight hypothyroid patients who were being treated were included in this study. For the assessment of the severity of CTS, the Boston questionnaire (BCTQ) and electrodiagnostic tests were used. For data analysis, an independent sample t-test and chi-squared test were carried out. A P<0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of hypothyroid and non-hypothyroid CTS patients was 46.21±7.22 and 44.24±8.02 years, respectively. Body mass index (BMI) was >30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> in both groups. There was no significant difference in demographic data among the two groups. The mean score of symptom severity in hypothyroid and non-hypothyroid-CTS patients were 30.37±10.84 and 35.89±7.19, and also functional status was 21.71±9.04 and 25.92±6.62, respectively. There was a significant difference between the two groups, in terms of symptom severity scale (P=0.017, 95% CI, 31.14%, 35.48%) and functional status scale (P=0.023, 95% CI, 21.95%, 25.67%). In terms of electrophysiological findings, there was no statistically significant difference between these two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study indicated that, contrary to expectation, the severity of CTS is higher in non-hypothyroid patients than in hypothyroid patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8728,"journal":{"name":"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11403109/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/bcn.2022.3578.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy. There are several factors that influence the severity of CTS. The purpose of this study was to explore the severity of CTS in hypothyroid patients.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the university clinic. Seventy-six participants with a clinically and electrophysiological confirmed diagnosis of CTS were included in the study. The demographic data and severity of CTS were analyzed based on the presence (n=38) or the absence (n=38) of primary hypothyroid disease. Thirty-eight hypothyroid patients who were being treated were included in this study. For the assessment of the severity of CTS, the Boston questionnaire (BCTQ) and electrodiagnostic tests were used. For data analysis, an independent sample t-test and chi-squared test were carried out. A P<0.05 was considered significant.

Results: The mean age of hypothyroid and non-hypothyroid CTS patients was 46.21±7.22 and 44.24±8.02 years, respectively. Body mass index (BMI) was >30 kg/m2 in both groups. There was no significant difference in demographic data among the two groups. The mean score of symptom severity in hypothyroid and non-hypothyroid-CTS patients were 30.37±10.84 and 35.89±7.19, and also functional status was 21.71±9.04 and 25.92±6.62, respectively. There was a significant difference between the two groups, in terms of symptom severity scale (P=0.017, 95% CI, 31.14%, 35.48%) and functional status scale (P=0.023, 95% CI, 21.95%, 25.67%). In terms of electrophysiological findings, there was no statistically significant difference between these two groups.

Conclusion: The results of this study indicated that, contrary to expectation, the severity of CTS is higher in non-hypothyroid patients than in hypothyroid patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲状腺功能减退症女性患者的腕管综合征评估
简介腕管综合征(CTS)是最常见的卡压性神经病。影响 CTS 严重程度的因素有多种。本研究旨在探讨甲状腺功能减退症患者 CTS 的严重程度:这项横断面研究在大学诊所进行。研究纳入了 76 名经临床和电生理学确诊的 CTS 患者。根据是否存在原发性甲状腺功能减退症(38 人)分析了 CTS 的人口统计学数据和严重程度。38名正在接受治疗的甲状腺功能减退症患者被纳入本研究。在评估 CTS 的严重程度时,使用了波士顿问卷(BCTQ)和电诊断测试。数据分析采用独立样本 t 检验和卡方检验。结果甲减和非甲减 CTS 患者的平均年龄分别为(46.21±7.22)岁和(44.24±8.02)岁。两组患者的体重指数(BMI)均大于 30 kg/m2。两组患者的人口统计学数据无明显差异。甲状腺功能减退患者和非甲状腺功能减退患者的症状严重程度平均值分别为(30.37±10.84)分和(35.89±7.19)分,功能状态平均值分别为(21.71±9.04)分和(25.92±6.62)分。两组患者在症状严重程度量表(P=0.017,95% CI,31.14%,35.48%)和功能状态量表(P=0.023,95% CI,21.95%,25.67%)方面存在明显差异。在电生理学结果方面,两组之间没有统计学意义上的显著差异:本研究结果表明,与预期相反,非甲状腺功能减退症患者的 CTS 严重程度高于甲状腺功能减退症患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Patients Requiring Special Attention as a Group at Risk for Coronavirus Infection. Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation on Parkinson Disease Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. A Novel Approach for Mucosal and Bulbar Olfactory Ensheathing Cells Isolation Based on the Non-adherent Subculture Technique. Therapeutic Targets of Probiotics in Parkinson Disease: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. A Review of Binaural Bates and the Brain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1