Implant of ATOMS® system for the treatment of postoperative male stress urinary incontinence: an Italian multicentric study.

A. Giammò, E. Ammirati, A. Tullio, G. Morgia, S. Sandri, C. Introini, G. Canepa, L. Timossi, C. Rossi, C. Mozzi, R. Carone
{"title":"Implant of ATOMS® system for the treatment of postoperative male stress urinary incontinence: an Italian multicentric study.","authors":"A. Giammò, E. Ammirati, A. Tullio, G. Morgia, S. Sandri, C. Introini, G. Canepa, L. Timossi, C. Rossi, C. Mozzi, R. Carone","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03457-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThe aim of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of the ATOMS system for the treatment of postoperative stress urinary incontinence (SUI).\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe included all consevutive male patients referring for postoperative SUI and treated with ATOMS system from June 2013 to July 2017. Patients received anamnesis, 24h pad test, pad count, physical examination, urodynamic evaluation, ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire. We excluded patients with low bladder capacity and compliance, uncontrolled detrusor overactivity.\n\n\nRESULTS\nWe treated 98 patients with median age of 70.21 ± 10.02 years. The most common cause of SUI was open radical prostatectomy in 79 patients. Ten patients had undergone urethrotomy, 7 bladder neck incision, 14 adjuvant radiotherapy. Thirty-nine patients suffered of mild incontinence (24h pad test <200g), 49 moderate incontinence (200-400g), 10 severe incontinence (≥400g). 31 patients underwent previous incontinence surgery: 29 ProACT, 3 artificial urinary sphincter (in 2 cases both devices), 1 bulking agents and subsequent male sling. Median follow-up was 21.5 months. We had a significant reduction of mean 24h pads test, pad count and ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire (p<0.01). At last follow-up 47.96% of patients were dry and 79.59% reached social continence. A high incontinence grade, adjuvant radiotherapy, previous urethral surgery and incontinence surgery have been associated with lower continence results. We had complications in 33 patients (33.7%). The device was removed in 4 cases due to scrotal port erosion and in one case due to persistent pain.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe ATOMS system seems to be an effective and safe surgical treatment for postoperative male SUI.","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03457-X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of the ATOMS system for the treatment of postoperative stress urinary incontinence (SUI). METHODS We included all consevutive male patients referring for postoperative SUI and treated with ATOMS system from June 2013 to July 2017. Patients received anamnesis, 24h pad test, pad count, physical examination, urodynamic evaluation, ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire. We excluded patients with low bladder capacity and compliance, uncontrolled detrusor overactivity. RESULTS We treated 98 patients with median age of 70.21 ± 10.02 years. The most common cause of SUI was open radical prostatectomy in 79 patients. Ten patients had undergone urethrotomy, 7 bladder neck incision, 14 adjuvant radiotherapy. Thirty-nine patients suffered of mild incontinence (24h pad test <200g), 49 moderate incontinence (200-400g), 10 severe incontinence (≥400g). 31 patients underwent previous incontinence surgery: 29 ProACT, 3 artificial urinary sphincter (in 2 cases both devices), 1 bulking agents and subsequent male sling. Median follow-up was 21.5 months. We had a significant reduction of mean 24h pads test, pad count and ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire (p<0.01). At last follow-up 47.96% of patients were dry and 79.59% reached social continence. A high incontinence grade, adjuvant radiotherapy, previous urethral surgery and incontinence surgery have been associated with lower continence results. We had complications in 33 patients (33.7%). The device was removed in 4 cases due to scrotal port erosion and in one case due to persistent pain. CONCLUSIONS The ATOMS system seems to be an effective and safe surgical treatment for postoperative male SUI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植入ATOMS®系统治疗术后男性压力性尿失禁:意大利多中心研究。
本研究的目的是评估ATOMS系统治疗术后应激性尿失禁(SUI)的有效性和安全性。方法纳入2013年6月至2017年7月期间所有连续男性SUI术后患者,并使用ATOMS系统治疗。患者接受记忆、24小时尿垫试验、尿垫计数、体格检查、尿动力学评价、ICIQ-UI SF问卷。我们排除了膀胱容量和依从性低、逼尿肌过度活动不受控制的患者。结果98例患者,中位年龄70.21±10.02岁。79例患者中最常见的SUI原因是开放性根治性前列腺切除术。10例行尿道切开,7例行膀胱颈切开,14例行辅助放疗。轻度尿失禁(24h尿垫试验<200g) 39例,中度尿失禁(200-400g) 49例,重度尿失禁(≥400g) 10例。31例患者既往行尿失禁手术:29例ProACT, 3例人工尿括约肌(2例同时行),1例膨化剂,随后行男性吊带。中位随访时间为21.5个月。平均24h尿垫试验、尿垫计数和ICIQ-UI SF问卷均显著减少(p<0.01)。最后随访47.96%的患者尿干,79.59%的患者达到社会自制。高失禁等级、辅助放疗、既往尿道手术和失禁手术与较低的失禁结果相关。33例(33.7%)患者出现并发症。4例因阴囊口糜烂,1例因持续疼痛,切除了该装置。结论ATOMS系统是一种安全有效的男性SUI术后手术治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica publishes scientific papers on nephrology and urology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of Minerva opinion editorials, editorial comments, original articles, video illustrated articles, review articles and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Real-life data on long-term follow-up of patients successfully treated with percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS). Identifying tumor-related risk factors for simultaneous adrenalectomy in patients with cT1 - cT2 kidney cancer during robotic assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. A systematic review of nerve-sparing surgery for high-risk prostate cancer. Comparison of outcomes between laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors (RENAL score ≥ 7 or maximum tumor size > 4cm): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Totally intracorporeal robotic ileal ureter replacement: focus on surgical technique and outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1