Provision of public goods and bads by agriculture and forestry. An analysis of stakeholders’ perception of factors, issues and mechanisms

IF 1.8 Q2 ECONOMICS Bio-based and Applied Economics Pub Date : 2023-05-03 DOI:10.36253/bae-12843
S. Targetti, V. Marconi, M. Raggi, A. Piorr, Anastacio José Villanueva, Kati Häfner, M. Kurttila, N. Letki, M. Costica, D. Nikolov, D. Viaggi
{"title":"Provision of public goods and bads by agriculture and forestry. An analysis of stakeholders’ perception of factors, issues and mechanisms","authors":"S. Targetti, V. Marconi, M. Raggi, A. Piorr, Anastacio José Villanueva, Kati Häfner, M. Kurttila, N. Letki, M. Costica, D. Nikolov, D. Viaggi","doi":"10.36253/bae-12843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The provision of public goods by agriculture and forestry has been a major topic of the agricultural policy debate in the EU. The objective of this paper is to investigate local stakeholder perceptions regarding the cause-effect relations between agriculture and forestry activities and a broad set of public goods and bads, and hence to contribute to the identification of improved policy options for a more efficient delivery of public goods from rural areas. The study presents an assessment based on 71 stakeholder questionnaires collected from seven case study regions in different EU countries. The survey was based on a list of the most relevant public goods and bads developed with the local stakeholders, and aimed to collect stakeholder perception of positive and negative impacts of agriculture and forestry on a range of environmental assets and their relationship with local drivers, socio-economic and cultural features, and policy mechanisms. The analysis shows that the role of agriculture and forestry in the provision of public goods is perceived as generally positive across the selected case study regions. Stakeholder opinions concerning the negative impacts on the environment were more divergent. In particular, differences regarding the impact of different socio-economic and cultural features, and policy mechanisms are evidenced. The results outline the importance of regulations. Also, payments for environmental services are considered relevant in particular for biodiversity, landscape, and water quality. Beside that, aspects such as expectations of society and the attitude of farmers towards the environment resulted noteworthy.","PeriodicalId":44385,"journal":{"name":"Bio-based and Applied Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bio-based and Applied Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-12843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The provision of public goods by agriculture and forestry has been a major topic of the agricultural policy debate in the EU. The objective of this paper is to investigate local stakeholder perceptions regarding the cause-effect relations between agriculture and forestry activities and a broad set of public goods and bads, and hence to contribute to the identification of improved policy options for a more efficient delivery of public goods from rural areas. The study presents an assessment based on 71 stakeholder questionnaires collected from seven case study regions in different EU countries. The survey was based on a list of the most relevant public goods and bads developed with the local stakeholders, and aimed to collect stakeholder perception of positive and negative impacts of agriculture and forestry on a range of environmental assets and their relationship with local drivers, socio-economic and cultural features, and policy mechanisms. The analysis shows that the role of agriculture and forestry in the provision of public goods is perceived as generally positive across the selected case study regions. Stakeholder opinions concerning the negative impacts on the environment were more divergent. In particular, differences regarding the impact of different socio-economic and cultural features, and policy mechanisms are evidenced. The results outline the importance of regulations. Also, payments for environmental services are considered relevant in particular for biodiversity, landscape, and water quality. Beside that, aspects such as expectations of society and the attitude of farmers towards the environment resulted noteworthy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农业和林业提供的公共物品和公共物品。利益相关者对因素、问题和机制的认知分析
农业和林业提供公共产品一直是欧盟农业政策辩论的一个主要话题。本文的目的是调查当地利益相关者对农业和林业活动与一系列广泛的公共产品和不良产品之间的因果关系的看法,从而有助于确定改进的政策选择,以便更有效地从农村地区提供公共产品。该研究基于从不同欧盟国家的七个案例研究区域收集的71份利益相关者问卷进行了评估。该调查基于与当地利益相关者共同制定的最相关的公共利益和公共利益清单,旨在收集利益相关者对农业和林业对一系列环境资产的积极和消极影响的看法,以及它们与当地驱动因素、社会经济和文化特征以及政策机制的关系。分析表明,选定的案例研究区域普遍认为农业和林业在提供公共产品方面的作用是积极的。利益相关者对环境负面影响的意见分歧较大。特别是,不同社会经济和文化特征以及政策机制的影响存在差异。研究结果表明了监管的重要性。此外,环境服务的付款被认为与生物多样性、景观和水质特别相关。除此之外,社会期望和农民对环境的态度等方面也引起了关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Bio-based and Applied Economics (BAE) provides a forum for presentation and discussion of applied research in the field of bio-based sectors and related policies, informing evidence-based decision-making and policy-making. It intends to provide a scholarly source of theoretical and applied studies while remaining widely accessible for non-researchers. BAE seeks applied contributions on the economics of bio-based industries, such as agriculture, forestry, fishery and food, dealing with any related disciplines, such as resource and environmental economics, consumer studies, regional economics, innovation and development economics. Beside well-established fields of research related to these sectors, BAE aims in particular to explore cross-sectoral, recent and emerging themes characterizing the integrated management of biological resources, bio-based industries and sustainable development of rural areas. A special attention is also paid to the linkages between local and international dimensions.
期刊最新文献
New pathways for improved delivery of public goods from agriculture and forestry Towards a holistic approach to sustainable risk management in agriculture in the EU: a literature review Modelling technical efficiency of horticulture farming in Kosovo: An application of data envelopment analysis Reducing food-related economic loss to improve food security and cattle trade in the Sahel: the case of agropastoral systems in Senegal Incorporating expert knowledge in the estimate of farmers’ opportunity cost of supplying environmental services in rural Cameroon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1