Angloglobalism, Multilingualism and World Literature

D. Ganguly
{"title":"Angloglobalism, Multilingualism and World Literature","authors":"D. Ganguly","doi":"10.1080/1369801X.2023.2175418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay explores the rise of global anglophone as a methodological rubric, and the place of English in global literary studies. My exposition pivots around a set of interwoven claims. While contemporary globalization has led to increasing linguistic homogenization, the rise of global anglophone does not herald the end of postcolonialism nor is it a force bent on erasing the cultural and linguistic diversity of literatures of the world. Rather, its valence can be generatively explored in the context of recent debates about the provenance of comparative and world literatures, and the emergence of multilingual transregional literary enclaves that are smaller than the globe and larger than a nation. Wariness about the moral economy of the angloglobalism can often be in tension with contemporary processes of anglophone transculturation. Further, the rise of global anglophone is inseparable from current debates in translation studies and the emergence of English as a global vernacular and a target language. Lastly, the global dominance of English appears less threatening when visualized through a comparative historical lens that illuminates the role of other world languages. As scholarship on premodern and early modern cultures indicates, linguistic cosmopolitanism and vernacular expressivity have not typically existed as antinomian forces in literary history.","PeriodicalId":19001,"journal":{"name":"Molecular interventions","volume":"1 1","pages":"601 - 618"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2023.2175418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This essay explores the rise of global anglophone as a methodological rubric, and the place of English in global literary studies. My exposition pivots around a set of interwoven claims. While contemporary globalization has led to increasing linguistic homogenization, the rise of global anglophone does not herald the end of postcolonialism nor is it a force bent on erasing the cultural and linguistic diversity of literatures of the world. Rather, its valence can be generatively explored in the context of recent debates about the provenance of comparative and world literatures, and the emergence of multilingual transregional literary enclaves that are smaller than the globe and larger than a nation. Wariness about the moral economy of the angloglobalism can often be in tension with contemporary processes of anglophone transculturation. Further, the rise of global anglophone is inseparable from current debates in translation studies and the emergence of English as a global vernacular and a target language. Lastly, the global dominance of English appears less threatening when visualized through a comparative historical lens that illuminates the role of other world languages. As scholarship on premodern and early modern cultures indicates, linguistic cosmopolitanism and vernacular expressivity have not typically existed as antinomian forces in literary history.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英语全球主义、多语言主义与世界文学
这篇文章探讨了全球英语国家作为一种方法论的兴起,以及英语在全球文学研究中的地位。我的论述围绕着一系列相互交织的主张展开。虽然当代全球化导致了语言同质化的加剧,但全球英语国家的兴起并不预示着后殖民主义的终结,也不是一股致力于消除世界文学文化和语言多样性的力量。相反,它的价值可以在最近关于比较文学和世界文学的起源的辩论的背景下进行创造性的探索,以及多语言跨区域文学飞地的出现,这些飞地比全球小,比一个国家大。对英语全球主义道德经济的警惕往往与当代英语国家的跨文化进程相矛盾。此外,全球英语使用者的兴起与当前翻译研究中的争论以及英语作为全球白话和目标语言的出现密不可分。最后,从历史的比较角度来看,英语在全球的主导地位似乎不那么具有威胁性,而其他世界语言的作用也是如此。正如对前现代和早期现代文化的研究表明,语言世界主义和白话表达性在文学史上并不是典型的反律法主义力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular interventions
Molecular interventions 生物-生化与分子生物学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Postcolonial Italy, A Public History Project Mapping Colonial Heritage Commemorating the Fascist Empire: The Public Memory of Rodolfo Graziani in Modern Italy Colonial Amnesia and the Material Remains of Italian Colonialism in Mogadishu Dealing with the Material Legacies of Italian Fascist Colonialism in Post-Communist Tirana Constructing and Consuming the Periphery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1