Meditatio mortis meditating on death, philosophy and gender in late antique hagioraphy

IF 0.2 N/A PHILOSOPHY Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo Pub Date : 2021-06-30 DOI:10.2298/fid2102177m
Maria Munkholt Christensen
{"title":"Meditatio mortis meditating on death, philosophy and gender in late antique hagioraphy","authors":"Maria Munkholt Christensen","doi":"10.2298/fid2102177m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to Socrates, as he is described in Plato?s Phaedo, the definition\n of a true philosopher is a wise man who is continuously practicing dying and\n being dead. Already in this life, the philosopher tries to free his soul\n from the body in order to acquire true knowledge as the soul is\n progressively becoming detached from the body. Centuries after it was\n written, Plato?s Phaedo continued to play a role for some early Christian\n authors, and this article focuses on three instances where Christian women\n mirror Socrates and/or his definition of philosophy. We find these instances\n in hagiographical literature from the fourth and fifth centuries at\n different locations in the Roman Empire - in the Lives of Macrina, Marcella\n and Syncletica. These texts are all to varying degrees impacted by Platonic\n philosophy and by the ideal of the male philosopher Socrates. As women\n mastering philosophy, they widened common cultural expectations for women,\n revealing how Christian authors in certain contexts ascribed authority to\n female figures.","PeriodicalId":41902,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/fid2102177m","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to Socrates, as he is described in Plato?s Phaedo, the definition of a true philosopher is a wise man who is continuously practicing dying and being dead. Already in this life, the philosopher tries to free his soul from the body in order to acquire true knowledge as the soul is progressively becoming detached from the body. Centuries after it was written, Plato?s Phaedo continued to play a role for some early Christian authors, and this article focuses on three instances where Christian women mirror Socrates and/or his definition of philosophy. We find these instances in hagiographical literature from the fourth and fifth centuries at different locations in the Roman Empire - in the Lives of Macrina, Marcella and Syncletica. These texts are all to varying degrees impacted by Platonic philosophy and by the ideal of the male philosopher Socrates. As women mastering philosophy, they widened common cultural expectations for women, revealing how Christian authors in certain contexts ascribed authority to female figures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
死后沉思:对晚期古抄本中死亡、哲学和性别的沉思
根据苏格拉底的说法,柏拉图是这样描述他的?正如斐多所说,真正的哲学家是一个不断练习死亡和死亡的智者。在这一生中,哲学家试图将他的灵魂从身体中解放出来,以获得真正的知识,因为灵魂正逐渐与身体分离。在它写成几个世纪之后,柏拉图?斐多继续在一些早期的基督教作家中扮演着重要的角色,这篇文章集中在三个例子上,基督教女性反映了苏格拉底和/或他对哲学的定义。我们在四世纪和五世纪的罗马帝国的不同地方的圣徒传记文学中发现了这些例子——在《马克丽娜、玛塞拉和辛克莱提卡的生平》中。这些文本都在不同程度上受到柏拉图哲学和男性哲学家苏格拉底理想的影响。作为掌握哲学的女性,她们扩大了对女性的普遍文化期望,揭示了基督教作家在某些背景下如何将权威赋予女性形象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Women’s education, knowledge and competence in Ancient Greece The role of education in Aristotle’s Politics The roman stoics on the emancipatory potential of the philosophical paideia The writing of existence in the latest work of Alberto Moreiras Recognition as a counter hegemonic strategy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1